Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys i just recently purchased r34 GTT for drift and circuit . I started getting parts for it , at this stage i got BLITZ FMIC , Xforce 3 inch turbo back exhaust , GTX3076r turbo , z32 AFM , and haltech ecu.

Which injectors and fuel pump would be the best for that set up ? How much power i should be expecting from dyno tune? Thank you

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/464704-r34-gtt-mods/
Share on other sites

With a haltech you won't need the z32 afm as they use a map sensor.

What fuel do you plan to use?

A walbro 400lph and some id1000's or similiar will cover you on e85 with that turbo.

I suggest looking at suspension also if your tracking it. Maybe a bigger sump and breather setup also.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/464704-r34-gtt-mods/#findComment-7724483
Share on other sites

^^^ What he said.

Best tyres you can afford. Standard upgrades for stock brakes: pads, braided lines, high temp fluid, new rotors of current ones are worn. These are heavy cars.

Definitely an oil cooler. Oil & water temp gauges at a minimum.

In fact if you're serious about track, it probably works out cheaper to buy a purpose built track-only GTT rather than building one yourself, it's a long hard road that.

Check my105.com or Carsales to see what they go for, also there was a nice 300rwkw+ track only GTT coupe here on SAU with all the fruit for just over 10k.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/464704-r34-gtt-mods/#findComment-7724489
Share on other sites

I have an R33 with a GT3071R and Haltech ECU and making 360HP at 16PSI on 98 pump fuel. Hope this gives an idea of power levels. Should make more than me. I have Nismo 555cc injectors and a 260LPH fuel pump. Same intercooler as you and a HKS turbo back 3". I think 360HP works out around 270KW.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/464704-r34-gtt-mods/#findComment-7724590
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...