Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

But in all seriousness. I don't use any bov, never will again. They all leak and cause serious lack of power around 10-30% throttle.

That's just my personal opinion

But I thought they help with transient response.

I would expect the stock BOV to open when boost in the cooler pipes, purely because of the softness of the spring

An aftermarket BOV adjusted to a hard setting is more likely to stay closed

The stock BOV's do have that little bypass hole as well, wether that makes a difference or not

BOV's work off pressure differential. Imagine for arguments sake the spring is worth 2psi, so with the car boosting it has 10psi on the cooler pipe side and 10psi on the top of the valve, so with the spring 12psi on the top, obviously 12 beats 10 so BOV stays closed. Close throttle, vacuum occurs in the manifold so now you have 10psi on the cooler pipe side and -10 on the top of the valve + 2psi so therefore -8psi

With the boost/vac line removed, you only ever have the 2psi of spring pressure holding it closed, so as soon as there is any more than 2psi in the system the valve will open

These are just rough numbers, but remembering how soft the stock BOV was to open by pushing it in with my thumb, I would suspect it would stay open alot

So really what you should have is a whoosh of air then possibly a small flutter at the end when the spring overcomes the valve. Although then you have to think about the effect the low pressure/vac that is present in the recirc pipe is having

  • Like 1

But I thought they help with transient response.

Pretty sure Tom said he's using an auto, but with a manual yeah when you get off the throttle when changing gears the recirculation valve will stop the compressor from stalling.

I would expect the stock BOV to open when boost in the cooler pipes, purely because of the softness of the spring

An aftermarket BOV adjusted to a hard setting is more likely to stay closed

The stock BOV's do have that little bypass hole as well, wether that makes a difference or not

BOV's work off pressure differential. Imagine for arguments sake the spring is worth 2psi, so with the car boosting it has 10psi on the cooler pipe side and 10psi on the top of the valve, so with the spring 12psi on the top, obviously 12 beats 10 so BOV stays closed. Close throttle, vacuum occurs in the manifold so now you have 10psi on the cooler pipe side and -10 on the top of the valve + 2psi so therefore -8psi

With the boost/vac line removed, you only ever have the 2psi of spring pressure holding it closed, so as soon as there is any more than 2psi in the system the valve will open

These are just rough numbers, but remembering how soft the stock BOV was to open by pushing it in with my thumb, I would suspect it would stay open alot

So really what you should have is a whoosh of air then possibly a small flutter at the end when the spring overcomes the valve. Although then you have to think about the effect the low pressure/vac that is present in the recirc pipe is having

Even more so if the diameter of the diaphragm is lager than the seating surface of the valve.

Pretty sure Tom said he's using an auto, but with a manual yeah when you get off the throttle when changing gears the recirculation valve will stop the compressor from stalling.

Hmmmm. I am in 2 minds atm. In a GTR I have the BOVs venting in the guard and considering removing them altogether So the question is whether or not I will see a noticeable change in transient response on part throttle. Any advice would be great.

I blocked mine off this arvo and noticed zero difference, 14 psi, breed valve, auto trannie. Have you tried lubing the shafts on the rec-valves with some molly grease? mine used to stick a little open until I lubed it.

Not much Sutututu either, stock intake pipe and airbox.

Did some quick calculations on my rb20 rec-valve,

Valve seat is 1" diameter = 0.785² inches x 14 = 11lbs

Diaphragm is 2" diameter = 3.14² inches x 14 = 44lbs

estimated spring pressure 10 lbs

so when at 14 psi boost, there is 44lbs pushing down from the diaphragm, 11lbs pushing up on the valve face, then add another 10lbs down for the spring

so thats about 54lbs down compared to the 11lbs pushing back up from the 14psi of boost.

To see how that changes at intermediate throttle positions you would need to put another pressure gauge before the butterfly in the throttle body, needless to say as soon the plenum approaches atmospheric pressure only the spring will be holding the valve closed.

Please correct me if my physics is off ;)

Edited by Missileman

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...