Jump to content
SAU Community

R32 N1 Rear Window Part Number


Recommended Posts

G'day!

the usual frustrating search has come up zero, so...

can anyone supply the Nissan part number or screen shot for the N1 rear window and the seal/trim kit?

I'm thinking of doing the wiper delete properly(I can't just bung up the existing hole; my OCD on this won't let me), and I realise it's gonna cost, but if it's still available, well...!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you have a R32 N1 VIN number? I can check in FAST tonight.


I don't. If I did, I'd own an N1 and could quote said number to Nissan Spares, which would be choice, but would also mean I had a busted rear screen I guess! Either way, I just need to know if the part a) still exists b) will work with the standard seal kit or needs something slightly different and c) whatzitcostmista?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, LTSJayce said:


I don't. If I did, I'd own an N1 and could quote said number to Nissan Spares, which would be choice, but would also mean I had a busted rear screen I guess! Either way, I just need to know if the part a) still exists b) will work with the standard seal kit or needs something slightly different and c) whatzitcostmista?

No worries, just remembered I can get a N1 VIN from the GTR Registry. I'll check tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

79712-04U06 does say N1 and 326 is crystal white which is what all N1s are as well. 79712-04U16 could be the non N1 glass, but that doesn't explain why there's only 3 colour codes listed. Unless it's a weird FAST thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

79712-04U06 does say N1 and 326 is crystal white which is what all N1s are as well. 79712-04U16 could be the non N1 glass, but that doesn't explain why there's only 3 colour codes listed. Unless it's a weird FAST thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

79712-04U06 does say N1 and 326 is crystal white which is what all N1s are as well. 79712-04U16 could be the non N1 glass, but that doesn't explain why there's only 3 colour codes listed. Unless it's a weird FAST thing.


The 79712-04U06 number *looks* like the right thing, initially. Now I need to know the seal kit number that suits it... I'm hoping its N79750-04U10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get ready for a heart attack when you see the price for the rear moulds. Fasteners aren't too bad yet.......

Part Numbers:

  • 79750-04U10
  • 79780-04U15
Cheers,

Bob.


Yep, already brought the full kit. Terrifying for what it is, BUT I have piece of mind that I've got the right thing!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LTSJayce said:


Yep, already brought the full kit. Terrifying for what it is, BUT I have piece of mind that I've got the right thing!

Where did you buy from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LTSJayce said:


Yep, already brought the full kit. Terrifying for what it is, BUT I have piece of mind that I've got the right thing!

Agreed, I'm doing the same.

Whilst it's a big swallow, the comfort in knowing I have these parts far outways the helplessness one will feel when these parts are no longer available.

And believe me, that will be a lot sooner, rather than later.

Cheers,

Bob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+1 interested in where you bought it from?

in regards to different codes for different colour, IIRC someone on gtr.co.uk mentioning some were tinted vs clear.


Seal kits for both from and rear glass are still listed and available through Nissan Aus.
In passing, I've heard there was a factory tinted glass option but I've never had it verified. I want clear, which I'd assume would be the easier to get if still available. My local Nissan parts interpreter is on to the part number for the N1 glass and he's fired off some emails to be absolutely sure it would arrive sans wiper hole(as you'd expect it to if it was N1). Basically it's a lot of money to outlay and then find out there was a communication error from Japan and it arrives either not N1, or apparently N1 but with a wiper mounting hole in it!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have your numbers back to front. 350mm from wheel centre to guard lip would be scrapinly low and the suspension arms would be at spastic angles and it would have the road manners of a meth affected giraffe. You can down to ~450mm (from larger stock starting values about 50ish mm higher than that) before you start to create to many problems.
    • I think last I checked it was 35cm from fender to wheel center. I heard u can go up to 45-48cm before handling his impacted. But I need to check again. I know I was about 1.2 cm off being close to max recommended. 
    • You'd need to weld on an external gate to achieve that number though. I can't remember seeing anyone make 500hp at the wheels with the stock manifold / internally gated turbo.
    • Suspension Component Question Looking for some feedback based on people's experiences! I know this has been loosely covered in other threads but I can't find any direct answers/experience. I'm up for some bush/rod replacements and was interested in a hybrid approach between hardened rubber and pillowball kit. Why not choose one or the other? Well, this is for my daily driver, which I track once or twice a year. I like a stiff car and a sporty feel but I don't want to compromise the chassis too much with 100% pillowball gadgetry.  I know from experience and a tonne of reading that not all components affect ride quality in the same way - eg. in my case, coilover top mounts should be hardened rubber as pillowball transfers way too many undesirable qualities and doesn't have much more upside than a good hardened rubber. But, pillowball tension rods translate to much better turn-in/steering response and make the car significantly sharper, without negatively impacting ride quality in a significant way.  I'm not TOO bothered by NVH (to a degree). So, with context out of the way, does anyone have any experience with a hybrid approach as mentioned above? I'm going to replace all components over time so am seeking guidance on: - front tension rods - upper camber arms - rear lower control arm - rear traction rod - rear upper camber arm - rear toe adjuster rod  Secondly, is there any reason why this is a bad idea? Or any other info/wisdom that I might not be considering. Cheers 🫶
    • That's good to hear I'll stick with the stock I hear they are good for 500hp and I'm only shooting for 350-400 once I can get this thing sorted and get to actually building it. 
×
×
  • Create New...