Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys,

Im currently looking at a few possible turbo options for my car. Im aim for 450-500Hp at the engine with this turbo. Now i first was hoping to stay with an internal gated turbo to keep the engine looking at stock as possible, but after doing some research, it seems that a turbo which has external gate will hold boost better, and have lower spoolup times.

Now is this true. Im paranoid about being defected, so basically if i can have a internal wastegated turbo that will hold boost well, then id be happy to do that, but if my setup wont work efficiently with internal gate, i spose ill have to go ext.

Im looking at garrett turbos atm. Is it possible to somehow fit the stock heat shield over a new low mount turbo setup? Im sure i could modiy it somehow to make it look stock.

Thanks

Dean

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The HKS low mount manifold going on mine has provisions for a heat shield. But saying that it still wont stop a nice police man for defecting you for that non std. gear knob. U know, the big safety issue it is :D

With mine....well if you are gunna get pulled over for a bs reason...go the whole hog.

But yes bigger turbos were meant for external wastegates....if you wanna do it properly go the external. Im not saying people dont have good results though from an internal wastegate. The new Ford xr6 is a GT35 internal gate i believe...ford must have some trust in them :)

Regency (Transport SA) has final say. Engineers reports, ADR tests anything means nothing to them here. If they are unhappy with it, it wont pass.

They even defect ADR approved steering wheels, Engineers certificates, and emission tests (which here in Adelaide cost 2k+)

And you cannot take them to court, because they are covered by the law itself...

that's a hard one, 500hp+low mount+ stock looking? i think maybe you should raise your middle finger to the law! a 500hp motor is easier with a big single on a high manifold, but the first option i can think of is the HKS 3037 with internal gate, which may be hard to find.

if you are going to change the manifold go external gate, if keeping std manifols go internal. My reason being that the external gate position on the std manifold as per may last setup is not the best and its not easy to set up right. But if you are chnaging the manifold go external and mount it low down below the turbo.

Grepin runs a 2835r i think and is making 280 or so and its internal gate, JMS have on on their site for 2500 is a t25 flange but can use adaper to make it fit, this would be ideal. You will make a easy 250rwkw and shoudl do 300 just with a internal gate turbo.

I got a GCG 450hp turbo and it makes around 265kw at wheels.. Not sure on Hp, I think its about 360 or so.. Looks standard but hauls arse over the standard turbo.. But then again its around 2k for the rebuild so you have to weigh up what you want the car to be for before selecting your turbo setup ect..

I got a GCG 450hp turbo and it makes around 265kw at wheels.. Not sure on Hp, I think its about 360 or so.. Looks standard but hauls arse over the standard turbo.. But then again its around 2k for the rebuild so you have to weigh up what you want the car to be for before selecting your turbo setup ect..

$2000 to rebuild ur stock turbo or $2400 for a nice new twin ball bearing garrett GT30.

I know what i would be buying and did buy.

If u r serious go external gate, you know you will get bored eventually and get one in the end :)

Guest Robo's
$2000 to rebuild ur stock turbo or $2400 for a nice new twin ball bearing garrett GT30.

I know what i would be buying and did buy.

If u r serious go external gate, you know you will get bored eventually and get one in the end :)

Sounds cheap being a $400 difference, but show us the real costs in the transplant!

robo youd have to beat my car in arolling run because you have 3rwkws more and 600rpm less lag! ive just had my stainless manifold fitted and will be getting the car tuned shortley will post my results. i doubt ill get much ove 225rwkws??? if i had my $2000 to spend again id go a gt30 everytime . yes more stuffing around to fit but you stand to gain more power in the long run.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I was using the wiring diagram I have So 12.74V is coming into the rear Fuel Pump relay as I measured.  When I turn the key to ON im getting 0.6V to the Fuel Pump plug; which i assume is backfeed voltage and doesnt include the 12V from ignition power.  The rear relay is working and being triggered.  From the diagram I clearly see the rear relay 80 = Rear Relay going into the Body/H loom (R-27) 27 = Fuel Pump plug going into the Body/H loom (T-20) 40 = Short Connector (R-27) I'm reading 12.74V on the blue/black wire which is the power for the Fuel Pump   From this diagram I can see the Ignition relay goes into the front and up to the ignition  2 = Fuel Pump Relay <1M> (R-27) 37 = ING Relay <1M> I started from the pump using this reference Which the way I read it (referencing Nissan wiring color codes) is: Pin Wire Color Function 1 B/P (Black/Pink) Ground 2 L/W (Blue/White)        ECU Trigger 3 SB (Sky Blue) Fuel Pump 5 L/B (Blue/Black) 12V Constant Tested SB to SB on Fuel Pump for continuity - confirmed Tested negative on Fuel Pump to 12V battery and L/B - confirmed 12V Pulled the relay putting 12V between Pin 1 & 2 and testing continuity on Pin 3 & 4 - confirmed relay   So that has me looking at this part of the circuit to understand whats happening here...and im still confused. From best I can tell; the disconnect is back to my previous diagram; between Ignition Relay and Fuel Pump Relay...which yet again; afaik is where the immobiliser should.    Thats what I was trying to explain to GTSboy; im not trying to fix it myself; yet I seem to have to get a Masters in Electrical Engineering (while im busy doing my actual job of DevOps & Cloud Engineering) somehow.  I just wanted more expert opinions; or more so that what I tested is correct and proves it to something around that area; to go back to the alarm tech (for a 3rd time) that he needs to fix it. He keeps telling me its not the alarm. He lives on the complete other side of the city so i understand not wanting to make a trip but as I said before if its the alarm it should be up to him to fix it. But he's adament its not; even though I pointed out the FP was immobilised through the original alarm. To my mind; it seems that the ECU is sending the signal; but the ignition is not getting 12V down the line.       
    • Maybe also really stiffly sprung track cars. Get the inside wheel up in a corner and all the fun stops. Also me sometimes (rarely) when I have to stand on the brake to convince the diff to drive the wheel that is still on the ground when I'm trying to diagonally get over severe driveway entrance, etc.
    • I feel like I'm missing something. You had an authorised installer come out and install a new alarm. Post install the car doesn't start, and you aren't getting the installer back to fix what they did wrong?
    • So either way it is gearbox out and look what is wrong?  I know about the input shaft bearing. Even before swap/new clutch the it sounded exactly like this: So is that inout shaft bearing or the other was installed backwards?  And can some please tell me the part number for that input shaft bearing? The gearbox is small box from R34 N/A and number is FS5W71C. Thank you  
    • I am yet to see anyone ever regret a quaife or helical. ...other than drifting/skidpan duties. I kind of want to upgrade my factory helical with a Quaife (but really it's not ultimately that different, and is a MASSIVE UNDERTAKING), that's how good the hype is about them, that I want to try them 'just to see'  
×
×
  • Create New...