Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

The whole place?  Note that I'm not unfamiliar with the UK, I've spent a bit of time there.  Never heard it used in that way.

It's international English here marveling is not a far fetched word in either spelling.

The Queen would possibly not use it. But the rest of the population has no issue with elevator (lift), holidays (vacation),  gas (petrol), highway (motorway), apartment (flat) or marveling :)

There is no way that anyone in the US uses marvelling in that way.  Nor Australia.  Nor Canada.  Excluding India, which we will ignore because there is no case for normalising the way that they use (abuse/destroy) English, that pretty much leaves the UK and a few places in Africa and SE Asia.....which I have also spent a lot of time in and never heard anyone use it.

When I hear myself think the word in my head, I hear it with an Ali G accent.

  • Like 1

Yeah marvelling and contemplating have entirely different meanings....

In any case, yeah, OP6 is the better housing to use if you ever really want to lean on the thing. Not often that people have both to choose from, and typically not really worth "upgrading" to if you already have a hiflow with the 21U housing.

That said, the Turbo is pretty much the most important part of the car for performance, so unless for some reason you must have stock turbine housings, or are aiming for 220kw don't use one.

21 hours ago, hypergear said:

OP6 is made for a Neo engine, and it has higher CPR, and more VCT cam angle.  Fitting that housing to a normal R33's high flow will result in an average of 500RPM worth of lag and increase HP by roughly 15kws. 

I think you'll find the static compression ratio is the same . Lower volume combustion chamber and the middle of the piston crown is lower . On the R33 spec RB25DET pistons the "plateau" is taller effectively giving deeper valve head reliefs . From memory the Neo turbo pistons may have the oil cooling channels behind the ring pack area like RB26 pistons do .

Pretty sure the Nissan WSM shows the static CR as 9.0:1 .  And they used a slightly larger side mount intercooler .

A

13 hours ago, Kinkstaah said:

Yeah marvelling and contemplating have entirely different meanings....

In any case, yeah, OP6 is the better housing to use if you ever really want to lean on the thing. Not often that people have both to choose from, and typically not really worth "upgrading" to if you already have a hiflow with the 21U housing.

That said, the Turbo is pretty much the most important part of the car for performance, so unless for some reason you must have stock turbine housings, or are aiming for 220kw don't use one.

I'm at 260RKW with the currently installed hybrid, or did you mean 320RKW?

Alas I prefer responsiveness to top end since the car is used 99% on public roads.

5 hours ago, discopotato03 said:

I think you'll find the static compression ratio is the same . Lower volume combustion chamber and the middle of the piston crown is lower . On the R33 spec RB25DET pistons the "plateau" is taller effectively giving deeper valve head reliefs . From memory the Neo turbo pistons may have the oil cooling channels behind the ring pack area like RB26 pistons do .

Pretty sure the Nissan WSM shows the static CR as 9.0:1 .  And they used a slightly larger side mount intercooler .

A

You're correct .. same compression ratio

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...