Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How to block PCV for catch can

What is the best method to block the pcv port for a catch can install? I took out the check valve, went to three different hardware stores and could not find a block of fitting with the same thread. 

What is the thread on this thing? I will order the proper fitting online.

Unless there is a better option 

Thanks

unnamed (3).jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/468520-how-to-block-pcv-for-catch-can/
Share on other sites

I can't tell you what thread you have but if you go to an engineering supply store or a hydraulic hose and fittings shop  they should be able to tell you what thread it is and supply a suitable fitting.

I have the same problem.
Googled and everybody said it's 1/4bsp. But it isn't!
This will screw in only 2 turns because the original part it is tapered.
The hydraulic shop ordered me the "right" one. Same thread as the valve, also tapered. But it screws in only one turn, because it's a little big thicker where the taper starts.

I will just use a good silicone end cap on the valve now.


Same issue here. A store specifically for fittings ordered me three different ones. None fit in. Insane!

I will cap it for now as well. Last resort is to cut of the thread part from the check valve and weld it to a bolt head

Just leave the valve there.

What you are installing is an oil-air separator. It effectively inserts between the exhaust rocker cover and the turbo intake. Everything else remains "factory".

Somewhere on this forum is a photo of my setup. Some people claim its not "pretty", but it works.

 

(here it is to save you the trouble)

PA122911.JPG

They aren't suppose to screw all the way in, the fact that it widens out and won't screw all the way in is what actually seals it 

go to Motorsport connections (or earls) and order one from them 

22 minutes ago, blind_elk said:

Just leave the valve there.

What you are installing is an oil-air separator. It effectively inserts between the exhaust rocker cover and the turbo intake. Everything else remains "factory".

Somewhere on this forum is a photo of my setup. Some people claim its not "pretty", but it works.

 

(here it is to save you the trouble)

PA122911.JPG

He is talking about a gtr not a gtst

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...