Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sparking Plugs For Tastefully Modified VQ25DET

During a regular service recently, the workshop fitted new plugs - NGK PLFR6A-11 Platinums - to my NM35.

And now the engine misses on boost at anything over 5,200 rpm.

The mechanic threw away the original plugs so I can't check their heat range.

But I suspect the newly fitted 6 heat range plugs are too hot.

If you had an M35 with a set of tasteful mods such as: Hypergear SS2PU turbo, fat intake, HDi intercooler, uprated actuator, Scotty dump & front pipes, Fujitsubo exhaust, HDi EBC, Walbro fuel pump and big injectors, & GReddy Ultimate ECU, etc., making 267 of Jez's kW atw, would you run a 7 heat range plug like the NGK LFR7AIX IX Iridiums, or would you jump to an 8 heat range?

Thank you.

Would have thought 6 heat range ok ...maybe 7 at the most - pull out a plug and look at it. Whether or not its the correct plug for a VQ25 I don't know - have you checked that? Is it still gapped to 1.1mm?

Wow, thank you all!

Sorry, I should have stated: 267kw @ 5,200 rpm @ 18psi on pump 98.

I did check the older (2015) SAU Wagoneers spark plug thread.

YangLUI posted a table listing NGK Japan's recommendations for the NM35 VQ25DET:

best to normal: LFR6ARX-11P -> LFR6AIX-11P -> LFR6AIX-11 -> PLFR6A-11. (All 1.1mm gap.)

So mine are recommended for stock engines, and gapped at 1.1mm.

But further in the thread, Scotty wrote:

"Stock engine, 6 heat range is fine, so is 7. Quite often I see 5 though which is too hot.
  Modified cars LFR7, or 8 if you have the coin for HKS tax."

And further, when replying to a question about Nismo RN020-7 plugs (NGK part no LFR7AIX-P gap 0.8-0.9mm), Scotty wrote:

"Those Nismo plugs are a 7 heat range, no point getting those [Nismo's] when the LFR7's are half the price.
  Gap doesn't matter in this case, as they will still work at 4mm gap thanks to our coils."

So that's why I think maybe the 6's are too hot.

Daleo's magic table (where did you get that!?!) indicates I should be running at least NGK 2309 LFR7AIX IX Iridium Plugs (which have an 0.8mm gap).

I'll get some.

Thank you all very much. What an absolute pearl this forum is!

I'm off to donate.

  • Like 2
  • 9 months later...

Just to finish this off, while fitting new plugs, Denso IKH24 (8 on the NGK Heat Range table,) we found the real problem is a left rear plug seal.

Oil had seeped down the plug.

The NM35DET rocker cover has the plug seals manufactured into it, dammit.

With new plugs, it's temporarily running smooth, while I try to locate a left rocker cover (anyone got one?).

For the VQ25DET, the rocker cover part numbers are:

RIGHT SIDE ROCKER COVER

maker             nissan
parts code     13264
parts no         13264-AQ801
parts name    COVER ASSEMBLY,VALVE ROCKER

Vehicle                   period                     model     fig
CEDRIC/GLORIA 1999/06-2004/10      Y34     111E
CIMA                      2001/01-2010/08    F50     111A
STAGEA                2001/10-2007/07      M35    111B

LEFT SIDE ROCKER COVER

maker            nissan
parts code    13264+A
parts no        13264-AL611
parts name    COVER ASSEMBLY,VALVE ROCKER

Vehicle                 period                         model     fig
CEDRIC/GLORIA  1999/06-2004/10     Y34     111D
CIMA                      2001/01-2010/08     F50     111A
SKYLINE                2001/06-2007/06     V35     111B
STAGEA                2001/10-2007/07      M35     111B

http://jp-carparts.com/nissan/partlist.php?maker=nissan&type=153&cartype=12&fig=111&page=8

Thanks for everyone's great help. At least I have the right plugs now! 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...