Jump to content
SAU Community

R33 rb30/25 hardline from head to block

thebe

By thebe,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

thebe Enthusiast

thebe

Posted
Posted

Hey all

 

Finishing up my rb30/25det build and realized my rb30 doesnt have a thread for this hard line from the head. The engine is in with pretty much every other line and stuff bolted to it (pic from google) so wouldnt really care to take it out and strip apart to tap a hole... Added a pic of my block when it was on a stand, feeling quite stupid :D What is this line for and is it absolutely needed?

 

Thanks alle872bf370d76aab69ef79be3014fe322.jpg9ac3b32c23edf50c521a3b40bc6c6d0f.jpg

thebe Enthusiast

thebe

Posted
  • Author
Posted

After thinking about it for a few moments I think these are my options:

 

1. Tee the head drain to the turbo oil return. Worried if the factory sized drain would be enough for my hx40 AND the head return though...

 

2. Drill and tap a thread to the block. How to prevent metal pieces from getting inside the engine though?

 

3. Take the sump out and drill and weld a fitting for the drain.

 

I was hoping to start my car next weekend for the first time in 2,5 years but dont really want to take shortcuts now that will haunt me in the future. Which would you recommend doing, keeping in mind the engine is in the car? I'm kinda leaning towards 3. If I take the exhaust off and lift the engine as much as I can without disconnecting the gearbox can I get the sump (rb25 oem sized sump) out and back in? That way I could clean the sump and no metal bits would get inside the engine.

 

When I do get the Engine running I will run it on idle to normal temp and then do my first oil change if that changes anything.

 

Other ideas? Thanks

 

 

iruvyouskyrine Grand Master

iruvyouskyrine

Posted
Posted

Is the HX40 ball bearing? Do you have an oil restrictor in the turbo oil feed line?

If both answers are yes then just tee it in to the turbo drain line. And the easiest way to take the sump off is to lower the crossmember while keeping the engine in place so you have access to all the bolts.

thebe Enthusiast

thebe

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Is the HX40 ball bearing? Do you have an oil restrictor in the turbo oil feed line?

If both answers are yes then just tee it in to the turbo drain line. And the easiest way to take the sump off is to lower the crossmember while keeping the engine in place so you have access to all the bolts.

Nope its journal bearing with an3 feed line without a restrictor. The return just meets the turbos demands.

Thanks for the tip with the sump. Its starting to sound like the best option
  • 1 month later...
czy18e Community Regular

czy18e

Posted
Posted

I am also in this boat. I notice rb26's don't seem to have this drain and others have blocked it off. Is it really required with a sump breather?
I am also worried if I plumb it into my turbo drain it will restrict the flow too much. I have a precision 6870.

Ben C34 Grand Master

Ben C34

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, czy18e said:

I am also in this boat. I notice rb26's don't seem to have this drain and others have blocked it off. Is it really required with a sump breather?
I am also worried if I plumb it into my turbo drain it will restrict the flow too much. I have a precision 6870.

Rb26 don't need it as it is a drain for the vct.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kapr
      "Cheap" bolt on turbo on RB25DET NEO

      By Kapr · Posted

      You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • Watermouse
      "Cheap" bolt on turbo on RB25DET NEO

      By Watermouse · Posted

      https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • Kinkstaah
      Airbox for +T

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • GTSBoy
      Airbox for +T

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • BuiltNotBought
      Airbox for +T

      By BuiltNotBought · Posted

      There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...