Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Modified r34 gtt part out

due to repair damage quote being a lot more then planned. i will be parting out my r34 gtt
car has all parts at the moment except front bumper passenger side skirt and passenger rear pod, both tail lights.
car is located in geelong and still drives on its own.
engine has 226,xxxkm all mods are less then 60k km runs fine no damage to anything mechanical just quater and end damage

quick mod list:
walbro 460lph fuel pump: $160
splitfire coilpacks: $300
tomei poncams type b: $600
bosch 100amp alternator: $120
ev14 725cc injectors: $500
 turbosmart hypergate 45mm external wastegate: $300
apexi avcr boost controller:  $400
plazmaman intercooler with cusom pipework (done by havoc fab will bolt onto standard pipework): $800
hypergear atr43ss2 turbo changed to V band external gate (2014 model and journal bearing ~50k km old): $900
nistune with flex fuel tune: $700
z32 afm: $150
full custom turbo back v band 3.5" stainless steal exhaust with magnaflow highflow cat (done by havoc fab) $1200
custom external wastegate off standard turbo manifold (done by havoc fab): $300
BC coilovers (no knocks or leaks): $800
npc 10" sprung button clutch: $500
hicas lockout bar: $70
work xd9 18x9 +30(front) 18x10 +38 (rear): $1400 (will no split set)
nismo clear indicators front and side: F: $100 S:$50
boost, oil temp, water temp gauges: $150 for lot
and all other parts avalible

buyer pays shipping on parts. pick up is fine also
first in first servered. no holds without deposit
will provide photos app on request. prices are negotiable.
happy to split parts (except wheels) or do deals on multiple parts. 
if parts are not stated as sold, they could still avalible please feel free to ask.

please message me on 0431394082 or reply here or pm. wont always be able to answer calls.


 

10404888_10205458853085772_7176397538981841118_n.jpg

10986930_10205458853725788_617916807617516459_n.jpg

11073400_10205431341638003_5093235743001205288_n.jpg

11232987_10206226370753234_2068878882568438886_n.jpg

12373376_10207210467355034_3220218803557256955_n.jpg

12705485_10207542072884965_5449384199185666417_n.jpg

13350513_10208430254368947_5448720572425969121_o.jpg

15589552_10210062920144571_8491232080019301309_n.jpg

20800357_10212196589964983_7807262142504128114_n.jpg

20800363_10212196589444970_8282606850089711775_n.jpg

20840767_10212196589604974_7157354125008182062_n.jpg

20841192_10212196590965008_7139658683959250217_n.jpg

20842236_10212196582284791_6669935866124334692_n.jpg

20882224_10212196590404994_4070135014533493425_n.jpg

20901604_10212196685527372_6336760540821617659_o.jpg

10401374_10203266272992640_7041613528776195768_n.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/472073-modified-r34-gtt-part-out/
Share on other sites

Oh, it's OK.  I'd only be interested in the diff if it was fully sick Nismo 1.5 way hella spec stuff anyway.  Hence my question about the subframe.  Because if I was going to change from my S15 helical, then I'd need driveshafts.  And if I need driveshafts, then I could use his.  And if I get all that, then he might as well put the whole rear end on a pallet and send it to me and I'll transplant yet another rear subframe into my car and get improved late model geometry (which I should have done using an S14 subframe instead of a Cefiro one!!!farken!).  After all, it's only money.  And then if I have R34 rear brakes I might as well put R34 fronts on as well.

See how it all snowballs out of control?

:D

 

standard gtt brakes. the whole rear sub and drive line is still in tact, as for diff im hoping to have it out today or tomorrow around work :) will get back to yous

took an ass raping by a grass bank... bloody vic roads and their horrible pothole written uneven roads -.-

ive had a lot of interest for selling the car as is, for those who maybe interested. the car is NOT a statutory write off, it is still able to be rego'ed (after repairs). i just dont have the money to repair the damaged myself. 

21463295_10212443586819750_8679104054368204507_n.jpg

21617705_10212443587019755_5067833108186518558_n.jpg

21686469_10212443587179759_2701287181328147971_n.jpg

21751936_10212443586699747_569217650050792191_n.jpg

21688053_10212443634100932_1890292623427950785_o.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...