Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

Sorry for the crappy photos... I know its hard to see however these are the only ones of the old dyno pic  I could get, you can make out whats going on though. Its been a lonngg time.

I am in the process of getting ready for a tune... need to get all the new bits etc together and work out what sort of tune I want. 

This was the tune that was done on it before. Keen to get ppls thoughts on how this car would perform and if these are ideal curves to make the car as quick and easy to manage in corners as I can for the power. I see so many ways to skin a cat when I look at different dyno sheets and how the cars make power its left be confused after tonnes of reading. What you can see is a very very flat power curve right through which I never see, most seem to be in more of an arc up to max power. The torque curve as you can see ramps up hard and drops off.

This looks very different to most dyno graphs I have seen where power slowly increases to redline rather than getting to full power and staying flat right though 2/3 of the rev range. Would this sort of graph show you that it makes for a quicker more predictable car through corners and fast down the 1/4 seeing as it gets to peak power so fast or is there a better way? 

Sorry for all the questions, so much stuff out there i am trying to work out how I should ask to get it tuned. 

 

Thanks a mil :)

 

Screen Shot 2018-01-15 at 12.18.29 AM.png

Screen Shot 2018-01-15 at 12.22.29 AM.png

Assuming that the charts are not backwardly labelled or some other issue, then the power is flat because the torque curve is falling off.  The engine is not making torque after 125 on the speed scale.  If the problem is not in the tune (which would have to be timing) then it must be flow limited.

The nasty wiggle in the AFR at 125 should be ironed out, but that's not a huge issue.

In short, this is not a normal setup.

 

Ideally the torque curve comes up to the "peak" value as early as possible and stays there, flat, until the redline.  This is not usually completely achievable.  On turbo engines especially, you don't get anywhere near peak torque until you have all the boost.  And at the top end, as any air flow restrictions (ie turbine housing) start to take effect, torque will drop off.

A completely flat torque curve gives you a linearly rising power curve.

Turbo engines usually have a rather more savage arrival of both torque and power at the point where the boost arrives, meaning that the power curve is often very low and flat, followed by very steep, followed by a more linear section once boost is stable, followed by a drop off if the torque curve suffers as mentioned above.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...