Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Since i installed a new radiator in the GTR i've been flushing the system with water as i'm changing coolant type. The green colour of the old coolant has gone, but the water comes out slightly dirty and with a very fine powder that settles out of the old coolant. The powder is too fine to feel. Should I persist with more flushes or is there something fundamental wrong?

Depends how you have been flushing it. I have just been doing the same with someone else's car - i.e. draining and refilling the system and it is only slowly getting cleaner but a proper flush would require you to remove the thermostat and reverse flush the block with a hose.

I think the heater core control is stuffed - i can't get hot air, so no. But yeah i guess I should give that another go.

I have been bringing to car up to temp (according to the coolant sensor) but not running it long enough for oil temp to get to its normal level.

2 hours ago, MrStabby said:

I think the heater core control is stuffed - i can't get hot air, so no. But yeah i guess I should give that another go.

I have been bringing to car up to temp (according to the coolant sensor) but not running it long enough for oil temp to get to its normal level.

So long as its hot enough to open the thermostat ...so I take it you are not flushing the block but just draining the radiator?

13 hours ago, KiwiRS4T said:

So long as its hot enough to open the thermostat ...so I take it you are not flushing the block but just draining the radiator?

I've been pulling off the bottom rad hose, and opening the bleeder on the top of the motor, and leaving to drain for an hour or so.

Should I pull off the drop radiator hose and run the garden hose through it too?

3 hours ago, MrStabby said:

I've been pulling off the bottom rad hose, and opening the bleeder on the top of the motor, and leaving to drain for an hour or so.

Should I pull off the drop radiator hose and run the garden hose through it too?

To get a flow you have to also remove the thermostat so you could probably replace it while you are at it (with another stock one).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...