Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys i just got my dream car last week. Its a 91 nissan skyline gtst type m. Ive beem saving for over 8 years to get this car and im so excited i finally have it. Im looking forward to many years with it. 

Unfortunately today i filled up my gas tank with 91 octaine ethenol free gas for the 3rd time since ive owned it and after i left the gas staion everytime i come to a stop at a light or intersection my car will idle out and die. I can start it right back up but the ilde is way low like 300 to 400rpm.

Can anyone help? 

Im not sure if this is the right place to post this question. Feel free to tell me and i will move it to the correct place. 

received_1803654729725538.jpeg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/474670-91-skyline-gtst-type-m/
Share on other sites

You in the US?  You need 93 octane for a start, otherwise it will ping, especially in hot weather.  But this should not cause it to stall.  They will run (idle) very happily on any normal fuel.

You need to look to the functioning and state of cleanliness of the idle control valve.  There are about 40099922774774661191919 threads on here about exactly the same problem.

Turbo cars generally need high octane fuel to avoid what is called "pinging" as a slang term for detonation or pre-ignition, which is very damaging to everything facing the combustion event.  Your 93 MON in the US is about the same as our 98 RON here in Oz.  The cars were designed/tuned to run on 100 RON in Japan.  Using lower octane fuel is a recipe for unhappiness.

When I suggested looking at existing threads, I meant, use google to search for your problem symptoms, and point google at this site.  You will be surprised what you can find.  Read, read, read.  Do not expect to get the answer handed to you in the first 2 minutes, because internet diagnose is fraught with wrongness.  We can give you suggestions as to what could be wrong, but it almost always turns out to be something different (and usually stupid).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...