Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

As the subject states, I've searched far and wide for this piece with no luck so if  you wanting to sell it or know where to source it from, please do let me know.

Many thanks,

Alex

Image result for r33 nismo gtr end caps

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/475589-wtb-nismo-end-caps-for-r33-gtr-wing/
Share on other sites

I came across a piece of second hand ones but they asking for 50,000 Yen which is around $600 AUD if I'm correct. This is ridiculous! 

https://page.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/x582723750

I came across a piece of second hand ones but they asking for 50,000 Yen which is around $600 AUD if I'm correct. This is ridiculous! 
https://page.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/x582723750
Pretty sure that's the going rate. I've been keeping an eye out for a second set, I've never seen a pair cheaper than $500.
Hence, i don't have a second pair. [emoji853]
2 hours ago, Steve85 said:

Pretty sure that's the going rate. I've been keeping an eye out for a second set, I've never seen a pair cheaper than $500.
Hence, i don't have a second pair. emoji853.png

That is crazy. I'm beginning to think the carbon fiber ones look better on my black GTR.

The cost is amazingly high. Unbelievable. 

  • Like 1
That is crazy. I'm beginning to think the carbon fiber ones look better on my black GTR.
The cost is amazingly high. Unbelievable. 
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. On the flip-side, if you find two sets let me know. [emoji16]
2 minutes ago, Steve85 said:

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. On the flip-side, if you find two sets let me know. emoji16.png

Lol! I heard Nissan is bringing back parts for older cars in its latest catalogue so hopefully we can source these in the future for $100-$200 as they ought to be worth!

Where did you get you set, again?

Lol! I heard Nissan is bringing back parts for older cars in its latest catalogue so hopefully we can source these in the future for $100-$200 as they ought to be worth!
Where did you get you set, again?
I paid 57k for my set... lol
They were on the car. But I'm trawling yahoo japan for a set.
7 hours ago, GTR-N1 said:

Yes. Pretty hard to find.

End Cap-1.JPG

Mate, if this is genuine Nismo - it's even rarer than the other pair! Never even seen it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
×
×
  • Create New...