Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...
Guys,

Is there a problem with oil getting into the AFM?

I have been told that it will ruin the AFM after prolonged use.

Is this true?

Yes after prolonged use it will go into the AFM but nothing a little contact cleaner and a steady hand can't fix. Dont want to kill the post but i have done signifigane dyno testing with air box's and found that a partition box with the air still accessible from the top is better than a completley enclose pod. The new Apexi filter is a non oil based filter and uses surrounding air from all area's. The Unifilter are a great product and i have used one in the past and the kit price is very well priced. But can i ask one question, why dont all you people who want a box make you own? It takes about 30 mins and cost ya about $20 :(

yeah no doubt some people are cable of making their own shield, this is a great option for people who can't or don't have the time.

The other thing I should mention is that I have seen a lot of cars coming from jp with an old HKS pod or similar. Generally, they either filter really poorly or are well and truely ready for replacement. Support a locally made and engineered product instead ;)

yeah no doubt some people are cable of making their own shield, this is a great option for people who can't or don't have the time.

The other thing I should mention is that I have seen a lot of cars coming from jp with an old HKS pod or similar.  Generally, they either filter really poorly or are well and truely ready for replacement.  Support a locally made and engineered product instead :cheers:

Couldn't agree more with you there Duncan, the ram pod should be one of the first things that people replace on there car when they first import it. Clean the AFM completly and then maybe look into using a non oil based filter from there. The Uni filter products are great and the contrstuction is top notch, if your in the market for a new filter guys take advantage of this buy as its a good price and a good product :headspin:

  • 2 weeks later...

drinkan. can you help me out with a partition/box to suit my pod filter wearing 32GTR? do you still run the stock air box in your improved GTR? if not what are you using? :D

Yeah unfortunately we have to use the standard airbox for Combined Touring and Targa :P.

pm sent re details of the 32GTR kit, we can get hold of these as well

Hi Duncan, please send me a PM as well re details of the partition/box for a 32GTR. I have got the Apexi twin air pods setup.

thanks in advance

glenn

Just a quick note for those who already have a pod filter... I can get ABS blanks with a 90 deg bend in them... Got one for myself, because I have custom intercooler plumbing. I just need to shape it myself. If there is intrest, PM me. They are about $30 plus P & H. Probably less for group buyy.

Pics attached.

Chris

  • 2 weeks later...

A free bump for the Unifilter Rampod induction kits.

I'm importing these into the UK from the good folk in Hornsby. Feedback has been excellent. I'm running one on my own GTSt, and also replacement Unifilter panel filters in my Delica, and Unifilter in my KTM bike.

The oil from these will NOT contaminate the AFM. Unlike some light oils that other filter manufacturers use, the Unifilters are oiled with a tackified foam filter oil. When you re-oil the foam, you squeeze out as much oil as humanly possible leaving only a sticky surface on the foam. Mine has been on my GTSt for ages now and there is absolutely no sign of AFM contamination.

I have found absolutely no noticeable diference in performance between runs with an Apexi dual funnel intake, a Unifilter Rampod induction kit and running with no filter at all (just the Rampod with the foam removed). Throttle response with the Unifilter Rampod and heatshield is noticeably better than when running the standard airbox. I am running 0.95 bar of boost and I suspect that the standard airbox MAY have been a little restrictive as this is well over the standard boost.

The Unifilters will also filter out far more crap than any dry foam filter, metal gauze filter or paper element filter is able to. A dry foam filter will only filter out particles that are larger than the spaces through which air flows in the foam. Metal gauze filter will only filter out particles larger than the holes in the gauze, and the same goes for paper element filter.

By the very nature of foam filters that are oiled with tackified oil, particles down to just a few microns across are filtered out as they cling to the sticky surface of the foam, rather than being drawn through. The majority of aftermarket filters will only filter down to 45 microns. Engine wear is caused by particle sizes as small as 17 microns, and something like a Unifilter will filter down to just a few microns.

Re the heatshield - it's not an enclosed box, but rather a partition that diverts the heat away from the intake, and is open towards the rear of the passenger side headlamp. It will not therefore restrict the intake of air into the pod as the pod remains open to air in all directions - so no worries there.

Final point - I've got to say that the metal construction of the Rampod intake tube is far better than the moulded plastic Jap Crap that nearly everyone for some reason is totally fixated on. It's about time people started to reliase that better stuff can be had from elsewhere other than Japan, and are far more sensible prices. Over here in the UK, the HKS and Blitz stuff is costing in the region of £200 just for the intake. The Unifilter kits, coming halfway around the world, are costing not much more than half of that including the heatshield and all taxes and freight.

Sorry for rambling..........just think you al should think about stuff other than what modified cars have on them when they leave Japan.

  • 4 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Hi Duncan, please send me a PM as well re details of the partition/box for a 32GTR.  I have got the Apexi twin air pods setup.

thanks in advance

glenn

can I have a pm too?

Hi Yogi, Unifilter only sell them as full kits, but thats good news since it gives you the chance to change your dirty, poorly filtering jp filter for a quality australian product :O

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...