Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Rychiie said:

How would you describe the pedal feel? Is it really stiff/heavy?

Very light.  Light as or lighter than stock. 
the issue with grabby clutches is trying to modulate them, and the fact they don’t want to modulate. 

I've got one in an R33 GTST track car, with around 300 RWKW. Mine is the Xtreme "230mm twin plate race clutch with ceramic solid centre" - they have a few different twin plate options so not sure if this is the same one.

Pedal feel is good, and very light (certainly lighter than the single plate Xtreme ceramic puck that was in before, probably lighter than stock clutch). I don't find it hard to modulate, but I don't drive it on the street, only the track. Full noise starts are easy, no issues with it being too "grabby".

Like Ben, cost (around $1000 less than a Nismo) and local support were factors, plus the previous single plate Xtreme lasted a lot longer than I expected it to given the harsh environment & power level. I don't regret buying it.

  • Like 1

I am also considering the standard nismo super coppermix but im unsure of the actual rating. It states 471 KW however im not sure if they measure it from the flywheel or at the wheel.
 

What do you guys think?

Look just buy a clutch and try it, it won't be the last one you ever buy. But to answer the question again:

Nismo more driveable but would hold less power than the Xtreme twin. Xtreme twin less progressive, but you can't have your cake and eat it too. (compared to a standard organic full face clutch anyway.)

If that is your choice of clutches, personally I'd go with the xclutch on price, and ACS after sales support in Adelaide is really really good. They supplied me with all the ATS carbon triple clutches too/

  • Like 2

Um, the comp version of the Nismo is <$50 more and >100kW more. I know which one I would buy if I was looking at 400rwkW.

This is just me harping on a subject that I have little direct experience with though. So listen to the others ref the Extreme. I have an Extreme clutch behind my Neo, but it is a baby clutch, so not relevant. Except inasmuch as it did have a mechanical problem years after I bought it and Extreme covered something like half the replacement cost, even though it was well used. They are good people.

Look it's rwd, the right single will hold it, but a multiplate is obviously better for more surface area, therefore better torque holding. 

Your overthinking it. Personally I'm not a fan of the Nismo clutches, had one once, never again. That's in launched GTRs, they just don't last repeated 7000+ rpm 4WD launches (waits for the Nismo coppermix brigade to chime in saying they are the best clutch ever).

Anyway sounds like you've got your mind made up so I don't really understand why you're still asking.

Buy one, try it, let us know what you think.

Um, when any clutch is engaged, how can it be noisy ? It's clamped so where is this noise you speak of coming from ? Do you mean disengaged (foot on clutch) and makes the signature Multi plate rattle, which all multiplates do ?

41 minutes ago, BK said:

Um, when any clutch is engaged, how can it be noisy

Sorry, pretty sure I didn't say engaged.

 

Released, as in not engaged, as in depressed. Sorry if my terms don't meet your approval - actually no I'm not, I couldn't give a f**k. I was pointing something out to someone who may or may not know how noisy a multiplate can be, not looking for a rude reply from you. If you know as much as you claim, you'd know what I meant by released - don't make up shit to make yourself look like an expert.

 

What's with the attitude ? Was not trying to be rude. Not making anything up, released was a shit term to use. I could use the term released as my foot not on the clutch, for example (clutch pedal is released). It was very clear what I meant, not what you meant. Having a go is not what I meant at all. I was not having a go, only clarifing. All multiplates generally do the rattle when depressed / disengaged mate, that's what I was getting at.

There are multiplates that don't rattle in the oem world, not sure in aftermarket.

It is a fair racket but at least you know why your car is making a crazy noise, people in the drive through not so much

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...