Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After we put a front facing inlet on the car, it basically cuts out if I press the pedal down too quick.(around 1k rpm if I remember correctly) Example if I have it idling and want to give it a quick rev it’s like she stops running and wants to cut out until I let off. It appears to idle fine and It will go full send without issue if I gradually press the pedal. What would cause this? I iniatlly suspected my IAC hose that goes from the IAC to pipe at throttle body as it had a massive kink and was basically cut off.  After searching online I don’t think it has anything to do with the IAC? I’ll swap the hose for a straight one anyway in the next day or two. Any suggestions? Vac leak maybe? 


thanks 🙏🏻 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481874-rev-problem-rb25det-neo/
Share on other sites

throttle body alongside a nistune, I know a lot of people hate ffp, fair enough I understand.

But still it shouldn’t do that as thousands of people have done it without issue. I’m just trying to find out the cause. 

maybe do a vac leak check. 

  • 4 weeks later...
On 27/01/2021 at 9:27 PM, GTSBoy said:

No, it will be boost sensor or TCS throttle sensor or something that hasn't been dealt with correctly in the change.

Thanks for that. Will check tomorrow as putting another hose on as well that’s isn’t kinked.  I still have the r34 throttle body. I might put it back on I hope I have room.

Think it’s best I should get my hands on a nistune cable soon.

Think you’re right @GTSBoy.

I check today and found the boost sensor was hidden right behind the rear of the engine hidden away and the nipple has snapped clean off the sensor. Picked one up today off a random Nissan, not same part number but 100% identical visually and has 3 pin plug also. Will try tomorrow and report back 👍🏻

Started it up and oil feed is leaking. 
it’s leaking from underneath the copper washer. It will also leak without the washer.
 

don’t know why the holset never came with two threaded holes. Is there anything I can do other than drill and tap for an adapter?

 

 

D37F357C-80A8-4B6C-B58B-68E47D57D5FD.jpeg

8C8C387C-5BEF-4520-BF1A-C8D756B9DBFB.jpeg

Edited by r34.rory

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...