Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

as I’m aware, but I might be wrong, the gtrs run a non return ffp setup stock. But on my GTT, I was wondering if there is any way to run non return piping post intercooler without having to cut out some metal around the battery area.(even if I retain the stock intake manifold or go ffp)

Is it possible? I just don’t want to cut metal out of the engine bay because I want the body to be stock as possible, but will if I have to because it is said the return flow piping usually restricts at 300kw.

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/482472-running-a-non-return-flow-setup/
Share on other sites

It can be done, will require custom made intercooler piping on the cold side. I have seen traditional return flow setups making in excess of 400rwkw. It's not that rf can't make the power, they tend to have a bigger pressure loss across the core making your turbo work harder to make the desired boost which then also increases intake temps. Ultimately it's not as efficient as could be but unless you're chasing every little bit of power and response they are sufficient for most street setups.

  • Thanks 1
1 hour ago, admS15 said:

It can be done, will require custom made intercooler piping on the cold side. I have seen traditional return flow setups making in excess of 400rwkw. It's not that rf can't make the power, they tend to have a bigger pressure loss across the core making your turbo work harder to make the desired boost which then also increases intake temps. Ultimately it's not as efficient as could be but unless you're chasing every little bit of power and response they are sufficient for most street setups.

Wow, really? I’ve got the setup where the exit port on the intercooler(cold side) has a 180 degree bend to the bottom and the piping goes underneath the intercooler. Are you saying I could 300kw+ with it? I’m looking to get about 310-320kw from my setup so I’d have that extra 20kw if I can.

btw how does the stock headgasket and head studs hold up at 320kw unopened neo? Big job to pull apart the head and change the gasket that’s all.

cheers

Yes, I've made 420+ through an auto with a stall converter, so close to 500 with a damn manual. I know the losses of the converter because I went back to the same dyno with a manual later and plotted the differences.

My intake air temp on the track at a track day was something like 35C on a 28C day. My engine was not unopened and I was running 24psi on E85.

Others have noted differences by changing the intercooler but reports are thin on the ground when someone only changes the intercooler.

There's many many reasons 300kw is a good number to stop at for sanity reasons (grip, clutch drivability, lag, reliability in general). If you're near there already, then leave the car alone and enjoy driving the damn thing instead of pulling it apart and paying tens of thousands of dollars.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
7 minutes ago, IM-32-FK said:

Wow, really? I’ve got the setup where the exit port on the intercooler(cold side) has a 180 degree bend to the bottom and the piping goes underneath the intercooler. Are you saying I could 300kw+ with it? I’m looking to get about 310-320kw from my setup so I’d have that extra 20kw if I can.

btw how does the stock headgasket and head studs hold up at 320kw unopened neo? Big job to pull apart the head and change the gasket that’s all.

cheers

I have the same style cooler and am making 312rwkw with a high flow turbo on e85. Made 260 on 98. Stock head studs and gasket handled that no problem and my car has done many many track days without issue and intake temps similar to what kinkstaah mentioned above. As you read, his car made well over 400 before he bitched out and went LS.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
9 minutes ago, IM-32-FK said:

I’ve got the setup where the exit port on the intercooler(cold side) has a 180 degree bend to the bottom and the piping goes underneath the intercooler

Important parts underlined.

  • The 180° bends involved in these things are certainly restrictive (compared to having the pipe come straight out). It's not a killer amount of extra restriction, but it is there. Some of them are pretty ugly designes, some a bit better.
  • The fact that such return flow coolers cannot be as tall as a straight through, because the return pipe runs under the core (where there could be and is more core in straight throughs) means that the flow area through the core is that much smaller. That also definitely causes the flow limit of the return flows to be lower. That part is actually simple to work out. If you only get 85% of the height, you can presume that its max power capacity would be only 85% also. Core thickness and tube design, plus differences in tank design etc notwithstanding of course.
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
6 hours ago, admS15 said:

I have the same style cooler and am making 312rwkw with a high flow turbo on e85. Made 260 on 98. Stock head studs and gasket handled that no problem and my car has done many many track days without issue and intake temps similar to what kinkstaah mentioned above. As you read, his car made well over 400 before he bitched out and went LS.

That’s good to know. I need to get the dump pipe v banded, the stock ex mani external wastegated, need new piping fab done post compressed housing so I’ll just see if he can also do me a non return setup. A guy sent me pics of how u can do non return flow without cutting anything. But I would need to cut the exit port on the blitz intercooler so it’s straight rather than coming down 180 degree. Why didn’t blitz just make it straight and put 180degree silicon hose instead?

anyway stupid question but do the internals of the intercooler make it a return flow or is it just the exit port? Like if I cut the port and make it straight then will the intercooler be a non return intercooler and act accordingly?

cheers

8216E7BB-91F7-4049-815A-2203DF0D7A65.jpeg

F456EA6E-5874-4CD4-BCD2-F8EF2D3EE3F7.jpeg

EDE54A23-37D8-4F75-A5D9-7816570B30A3.jpeg

Edited by IM-32-FK

That is a nice way of doing it. If you're going to go that way, don't try to modify the rf core, just sell it on and replace it with a traditional full size core with custom piping. The blitz rf cores are not full height or thickness. Get a 600x300x76 to suit your budget, aeroflow is ok on the cheap end, if you have the $ and want to do it properly, plazmaman is nice.

15 minutes ago, admS15 said:

That is a nice way of doing it. If you're going to go that way, don't try to modify the rf core, just sell it on and replace it with a traditional full size core with custom piping. The blitz rf cores are not full height or thickness. Get a 600x300x76 to suit your budget, aeroflow is ok on the cheap end, if you have the $ and want to do it properly, plazmaman is nice.

The blitz rf is 620 x 266 x 76mm.  I was thinking maybe 600x300x100 but that might lag and that’s the last thing I want. Otherwise I’ll just go the size you mentioned. What do you think is best?

The one I was using is the Blitz. There's sometimes a difference between academic gains and actual real world gains you can feel.

Do a dyno before and after and see, but a larger core IS better and having less bends IS better, but what you have will suit what you need well enough too. It's up to you to determine if your $ is worth ... however much gain this truly is for however you truly use the car, and how truly stock you want it to look and so on

  • Like 3
On 03/06/2021 at 9:11 AM, Kinkstaah said:

The one I was using is the Blitz. There's sometimes a difference between academic gains and actual real world gains you can feel.

Do a dyno before and after and see, but a larger core IS better and having less bends IS better, but what you have will suit what you need well enough too. It's up to you to determine if your $ is worth ... however much gain this truly is for however you truly use the car, and how truly stock you want it to look and so on

Thanks a lot for that. If anything you can get plazmaman 600 300 76 intercoolers for really cheap like $500, but then I’d need to spend another $500 at least to get pipe work post intercooler.

I think I now have everything and am ready to put it all in.

I don’t plan on running a catch can to turbo intake, so I’ll run the two breathers on rocker cover to a catch can that vents to atmosphere. And I also bought a pcv blanking bung, so I don’t get oil into the plenum. Is it safe to run it like this? It won’t cook the engine?

also I got a z32 afm but I heard the r35 gtr afm cards are ‘better’.  I’m pretty sure with my setup I’m going to be pushing maybe 18-22psi on a 3076r. Obviously r35 afm is better but will the z32 suffice? 

[old man hat on]

You're potentially adding complication here for little benefit.
Consider the piping in the bay and the convoluted path it needs to get back to the throttle.
Consider the issues/cost going FFP and visual legalities too, you'll need to do one or the other but plenty of people do route piping to the stock throttle body location.

It's really sensible to let the PCV continue doing what it was designed to do. There's two elements of it (by "fixing" it), venting excess crankcase pressure, and controlling oil from going back into the intake. Keep in mind you will be adding something to manage (i.e emptying the can) but it won't draw nearly as much oil if it's not connected to some kind of suction point.

PCV and oil control are really track mods - What do you really plan on doing with the car, are you modifying systems that even need improvement? Have you identified where the stock PCV is holding you back, and how, and how it needs to be changed to suit your use? The simplest way is to put a can 'between' the PCV system hoses so it intercepts the intake, then proceed to worry if the amount of caught oil is normal

Spoiler: It's been going into your motor the entire time with minimal issues 😛

Same story with the AFM. I've never heard anything other than "It kinda works most of the time" with AFM's post Z32 (the card style, and R35 style upgrades)

Most people go a MAP based ECU at that the point that a Z32 is truly no longer usable.

22 hours ago, IM-32-FK said:

If anything you can get plazmaman 600 300 76 intercoolers for really cheap like $500

I doubt that's their Pro series core, most likely their bar & plate stuff which is pretty much China cores.

If you're on a budget, I would install a R35 card MAF post intercooler. This would increase driveability as well eliminate any issues with reversion, lack of return BOV, etc.

Sure the Z32 works, makes the power you need, etc. but does it drive really well? I would say no.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...