Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Peeps!

Im getting ready to do my engine build and im thinking of things i can do before the car goes in to get the engine taken out and the work begins .I was thinking of getting 

Frenchie's performance in tank baffle kit(https://frenchysperformancegarage.com/products/nissan-skyline-r32gt-r-in-tank-surge-tank-kit) running a walbro 450 as the lift pump

and a 525 as the main feed.. then running -8 lines feed and return to A radium fuel rail and matching Fpr.. I want to do this with the stock ecu and still drive the car around

until it time to drive it to where the build will start.. it currently is running 270rwkw on 15psi with a flashed stock ecu and steel wheel exhaust turbines.. being the only mods

Anyone see a problem doing this? ( i would bypass the factory fuel controller and just run the 2 fuel pumps through 2 dedicated relays triggered by the ecu.

Cheers! for any input.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/482550-upgraded-fuel-system-on-stock-gtr/
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Duncan said:

It's hard to advise what you should/could do without knowing your plans/power targets.

more asking if there would be any issues running 2 fuel pumps on stock setup before the build

no, no issues. you aren't really running 2 pumps when they are lift + main, and you aren't intending to use the stock wiring so no issue there either. It will circulate way more fuel than you need so the fuel may get warm, but it's not a motorsport application so you will never notice.

  • Like 1

Make sure the FPR you buy can actually return a ton of fuel if you plan on running it with the stock ECU, otherwise you are going to seriously overfuel as the fuel pressure will overshoot. Or you will have to come up with some kind of alternate solution to replace the stock FPCM to slow down the pumps at low RPM. You don't actually want to have too much fuel flowing on the return line, it heats up the fuel and eats away at reserve amps on your alternator. You could also cavitate the pump running the tank low much more easily. Only pulling 40A for a short period at WOT is a very different thing compared to pulling 40A all the time just to run your fuel pumps. I've also heard that the stock fuel rail actually flows just fine for big power, so you may want to think about how necessary that really is.

I've been agonizing over something similar on my R33 and I think my conclusion is to run a 5 bar FPR on a DW440 brushless fuel pump to get just enough flow to max out my dinky little twin turbos. The hard part is the controller, I don't really see any simple drop-in replacement that can use the OEM ECU fuel pump signals to set an appropriate fuel pump duty cycle. It really shouldn't be that complicated, just 3 speeds instead of the 2 speed variants I've seen and some method of programming the desired duty cycle for each speed.

7 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

Make sure the FPR you buy can actually return a ton of fuel if you plan on running it with the stock ECU, otherwise you are going to seriously overfuel as the fuel pressure will overshoot. Or you will have to come up with some kind of alternate solution to replace the stock FPCM to slow down the pumps at low RPM. You don't actually want to have too much fuel flowing on the return line, it heats up the fuel and eats away at reserve amps on your alternator. You could also cavitate the pump running the tank low much more easily. Only pulling 40A for a short period at WOT is a very different thing compared to pulling 40A all the time just to run your fuel pumps. I've also heard that the stock fuel rail actually flows just fine for big power, so you may want to think about how necessary that really is.

I've been agonizing over something similar on my R33 and I think my conclusion is to run a 5 bar FPR on a DW440 brushless fuel pump to get just enough flow to max out my dinky little twin turbos. The hard part is the controller, I don't really see any simple drop-in replacement that can use the OEM ECU fuel pump signals to set an appropriate fuel pump duty cycle. It really shouldn't be that complicated, just 3 speeds instead of the 2 speed variants I've seen and some method of programming the desired duty cycle for each speed.

Most people seem to think the fuel pump/pumps going full tilt 24/7 will be fine and the heat negligible , but as u say the fpr needs to be up to scratch (mine is rated to 800hp Aeromotive ) as for pump modulation  on factory ecu

this is the only one ive been able to find

https://aeromotiveinc.com/product/billet-fuel-pump-speed-controller/

3 minutes ago, boomtheroom said:

Most people seem to think the fuel pump/pumps going full tilt 24/7 will be fine and the heat negligible , but as u say the fpr needs to be up to scratch (mine is rated to 800hp Aeromotive ) as for pump modulation  on factory ecu

this is the only one ive been able to find

https://aeromotiveinc.com/product/billet-fuel-pump-speed-controller/

I don't think the fuel heating issue is quite as big a problem as it is on stuff like the R35 because the transmission is up front, in the R35s it is actually bad enough with some fuel pumps to cause fuel to boil at the pump inlet which almost immediately causes cavitation and fuel pressure loss. So in that situation you absolutely want to avoid running higher duty cycle than necessary. Deatschwerks makes a fuel pump controller that takes a PWM signal, all I'd need to get it to run on the stock ECU is yet another microcontroller sitting between the stock ECU fuel pump signal that translates the digital signal from the ECU into a PWM signal going into the fuel pump controller. Or I'd have to take apart their 2 speed controller, look for another digital input that could be used, and somehow figure out how to rewrite the code to be able to specify arbitrary duty cycles for "full speed", "medium speed", and "low speed".

Get a modern ECU, a solid state relay (with internal fly back diode OR wire one in) and run PWM.

No need for an expensive fuel controller and no need to heat up your fuel with a 500+ watt fuel heater

20 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Get a modern ECU, a solid state relay (with internal fly back diode OR wire one in) and run PWM.

No need for an expensive fuel controller and no need to heat up your fuel with a 500+ watt fuel heater

Right, the actual answer is don't bother with the stock ECU and just use a standalone to drive the PWM. Brushless fuel pumps mandate and come with a motor controller.

1 minute ago, joshuaho96 said:

Right, the actual answer is don't bother with the stock ECU and just use a standalone to drive the PWM. Brushless fuel pumps mandate and come with a motor controller.

already have the walbro pumps.. will be getting the linkg4x ecu.. is meor just a a temp solution as i said above..cheers!

2 minutes ago, boomtheroom said:

already have the walbro pumps.. will be getting the linkg4x ecu.. is meor just a a temp solution as i said above..cheers!

With a standard brushed fuel pump there's no controller needed, once you transition to a standalone you just do what @Dose Pipe Sutututu described, a relay controlling the connection to ground driven by a digital output on the Link. This approach unlike the stock dropping resistor doesn't run into issues with high flow fuel pumps getting unhappy when driven at low voltages.

  • Like 1
4 minutes ago, boomtheroom said:

would it be all good to run the lift pump at 100 all the time? and the us a  controller on the feed pump?

Can't see an issue with that.

With my setup, I have a DW200 lift pump that runs at 100% with the factory drop resistor deleted and the FPCM disconnected.

In my SPR400 surge tank, there are twin Walbro 460 pumps which are connected to a SSR and PWM at 100hz. At idle, they're run at 40% DC. This increases in a linear fashion as MAP increases till 230kPA where both pumps are at 100% DC.

The above setup will keep fuel temps under 50 degrees Celsius after 10 laps of Wakefield Park. I can't imagine what fuel temps would be like with all 3x pumps at full tilt.

2 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Can't see an issue with that.

With my setup, I have a DW200 lift pump that runs at 100% with the factory drop resistor deleted and the FPCM disconnected.

In my SPR400 surge tank, there are twin Walbro 460 pumps which are connected to a SSR and PWM at 100hz. At idle, they're run at 40% DC. This increases in a linear fashion as MAP increases till 230kPA where both pumps are at 100% DC.

The above setup will keep fuel temps under 50 degrees Celsius after 10 laps of Wakefield Park. I can't imagine what fuel temps would be like with all 3x pumps at full tilt.

what ssr u using?

 

@boomtheroom this one from Jaycar, I suspect it's just a rebranded Crydom one. Make sure you use a good diode as the flyback diode. If not, the voltage spikes will fry the SSR.

https://www.jaycar.com.au/solid-state-relay-4-32vdc-input-30vdc-100a-switching/p/SY4086

 

7 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

@boomtheroom this one from Jaycar, I suspect it's just a rebranded Crydom one. Make sure you use a good diode as the flyback diode. If not, the voltage spikes will fry the SSR.

https://www.jaycar.com.au/solid-state-relay-4-32vdc-input-30vdc-100a-switching/p/SY4086

 

any that have a built in flyback diode? ... also would 1 be enough to run 2 20a fuel pumps?

22 minutes ago, boomtheroom said:

any that have a built in flyback diode? ... also would 1 be enough to run 2 20a fuel pumps?

Not that I could easily find, yeah it's a 100AMP SSR :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...