Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That's what the label on the box showed, unless GCG sent me something different inside.

spacer.png

I had a shop doing the installation, and they told me I didn't need it.  Not sure if it's a good idea to add a restrictor on top of another anyway, that may reduce or slow the oil flow too much.

Edited by TXSquirrel
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/483560-gt2859r-turbos/#findComment-7963995
Share on other sites

I don't think what you are questioning have any relation to the oil situation around the restrictor.

No, I have no issue for the past 5 years, lag, smoke, etc.  I do feel the -9s are still laggier than I expected, even with the Tomei cams I have that come with very different centerline than factory cams.

I have stock oil pump.  A high pressure oil pump will not impact the oil restrictor.

Mine is dyno tuned to 20psi, but I only run 15psi most of the time.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/483560-gt2859r-turbos/#findComment-7964088
Share on other sites

The questions I asked are I think relevant to the oil restrictor because it seems people that tend to have problems with Garrett turbos:

a) experience more lag and/or smoke because of over oiling

b) run high pressure pumps

c) run high boost which is probably why they have the high pressure oil pump.

One theory is the high pressure pumps over power the in-built 1.0mm restrictors causing a) above and so require the HKS 0.8mm restrictors.

Anyway thanks very much for all your replies - you have really helped me make up my mind not to use secondary restrictors.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/483560-gt2859r-turbos/#findComment-7964095
Share on other sites

On 22/04/2022 at 11:11 PM, TXSquirrel said:

 the -9s are still laggier than I expected, even with the Tomei cams I have that come with very different centerline than factory cams.

Put your factory cams back in. Just gonna be laggier with those Tomei lumps.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/483560-gt2859r-turbos/#findComment-7964098
Share on other sites

On 23/04/2022 at 6:33 AM, proline said:

The questions I asked are I think relevant to the oil restrictor because it seems people that tend to have problems with Garrett turbos:

a) experience more lag and/or smoke because of over oiling

b) run high pressure pumps

c) run high boost which is probably why they have the high pressure oil pump.

One theory is the high pressure pumps over power the in-built 1.0mm restrictors causing a) above and so require the HKS 0.8mm restrictors.

Anyway thanks very much for all your replies - you have really helped me make up my mind not to use secondary restrictors.

The difference in restrictions you're talking about is negligible on a turbo oil feed.

I run the original HKS GT-SS which are metal ball bearing -9 equivalent. They came with restricted banjo bolt from memory, not an actual restrictor in the turbo. There was nothing in the turbo chra to limit oil flow.

The newer -9 sounds like the oil restrictor feed is in the chra for exactly the reason of not needing any restrictors in the fittings or line, so you can't stuff it up.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/483560-gt2859r-turbos/#findComment-7964099
Share on other sites

On 4/22/2022 at 6:41 AM, TXSquirrel said:

I don't think what you are questioning have any relation to the oil situation around the restrictor.

No, I have no issue for the past 5 years, lag, smoke, etc.  I do feel the -9s are still laggier than I expected, even with the Tomei cams I have that come with very different centerline than factory cams.

I have stock oil pump.  A high pressure oil pump will not impact the oil restrictor.

Mine is dyno tuned to 20psi, but I only run 15psi most of the time.

Doesn't the turbo call for a specific oil pressure at the feed? So in theory at least a super high pressure oil pump will need more restriction and a low pressure oil pump would need less restriction. How much that actually matters in the context of real parts I don't know.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/483560-gt2859r-turbos/#findComment-7964110
Share on other sites

Not oil pressure- oil volume. As long as it's not the volume requirement for a journal bearing turbo as they require far less oil volume on a ball bearing cartridge.

Read what I posted. The turbos oil volume is regulated by the restriction too. On my HKS GT-SS it was to use a different supplied banjo bolt as the restriction, as in say remove the standard banjo with a 5mm odd hole (stock journal bearing heap of shit) vs one with a smaller (1mm or so) hole for a ball bearing cartridge.

If the new -9 are restricted as implied at the chra to the correct size it doesn't matter what oil feed bolt you use as long as it's bigger than the chra oil feed restriction fitting. I've noticed Precision doing exactly this on their ball bearing cartridges to stop muppets getting the oil feed sizing wrong - just use a -4 line to oil turbo feed and it will be correct as the chra fitting has been restricted for you correctly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/483560-gt2859r-turbos/#findComment-7964122
Share on other sites

I checked online and Garrett seems to suggest that at warm idle minimum oil pressure at the inlet needs to be at least 15 psi and at redline no more than 45 psi. Can you really separate oil pressure and flow rate in these systems? I assume that when the spec says a certain oil pressure it implies a certain resulting pressure drop across the CHRA and a resulting flow rate.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/483560-gt2859r-turbos/#findComment-7964160
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I take it that you bought the centre to suit the GTR axles? As in there was a plan, not just somehow lucky that it worked? It all looks excellent, by the way.
    • New engine block time. Up to you whether you want to keep going down this road with this project. Unfortunately a lot of these cars are like this. The road to getting these cars into decent shape is long and not fun for reasons that you're discovering. 
    • Essay time. First things first, an RB running stock turbo and boost levels shouldn't get so bad as to stall from reversion if the recirc valve has been deleted. Should get a little fluffy and annoying, but in my experience, not so bad as to stall. Of course, every car is a bit different, so it remains possible that stalling will happen. So, running with no recirc valve is somewhat of an option, for otherwise stock stuff. Atmo BOVs cause all sorts of shit, even on an otherwise stock setup. Only gets worse the higher the boost and the bigger the turbo. At that point you really need to go for a different ECU and no AFM. Rebuilding the stock recirc valve configuration is not hard. You just need a stock or aftermarket BOV with the appropriate adapter for the 2 bolt flange on the back of the J pipe, and to get/make an appropriate ~1" pipe to get the air back to the turbo inlet, and to possibly modify the inlet (if it is not stock) to take the recirc pipe back in. Not hard. Just takes some cutting and welding. Putting an R35 type AFM into the car anywhere is not as simple as just buying the AFM and throwing it in. You will also need to buy the appropriate boss that will then need to be welded onto the pipe where you're installing it. You can clearly see why by looking at the photo posted above. They are not a "simple" swap for a stocker. You can't put on in place of the stock AFM. You can put one in place of the stock AFM, if you get the mounting boss and weld it to some pipe and otherwise make that pipe piece work like the stock AFM housing. Or you can buy such an adapter, either complete with the 4 bolt flange for the air box, or without, for varying degrees of work needed to then make it fit your stock airbox or some pod filter or whatever you have going on. Oh, and the R35 AFM is not plug and play. The wiring is different, but changing that is trivial. The plug is also different so you either end up repinning the original wires onto the new plug, or you just use a short adapter. If you weld a boss to the cold side pipe, the cold side pipe really wants to be 3", otherwise the scaling on the meter can get a bit weird, but whatever the pipe size, it's not as easy as just using the (fully documented in the Nistune doco) simple method for choosing R35 AFM in X" pipe size in the software, because the scaling will already be a bit different. Anyway, all of this has been comprehensively worked through on the Nistune forums, so there is full knowledge available. I would use a Link/Haltech before I would bother putting an AFM into a cold side pipe. That's a lot of effort for a bodge. Nistune is great, can work well even at fairly high power levels, but you are stuck with the limitations of it being the stock ECU, which includes needing to use an AFM, which is not always convenient for every set of modifications. You have to have a think about what you already have, what you want to have, and decide early if you'd be better off jumping ship to an aftermarket ECU. This so you don't waste time and money doing things 2 or 3 times. Never heard of ECUmaster. Sounds like a backyard operation. If there are good tuners for it where you are, and it is a solid product, then it will be fine. We're only talking about an R engine here. Back in the day they all ran on crude nasty early 90s ECUs and they were fine. You don't need a rocket surgeon's ECU to run one.
    • So left off with high hopes of having a gearbox in pretty quickly........ Got the adapter plate that week and had to chase a few threads and work out how/where everything goes as no instructions. Got the adapter fitted, test fitted gearbox and found had to cut and shave a few things. Tunnel required some hits with a decent hammer to give some clearance on passenger side but it fits with no problems,  could fit a 8hp70 with a little more work. For a cross member I wasn't going to spend $1100 on so shiny machined piece. Went through a few designs and remembered I had a gktech s chassis to cd00# cross member. Fitted that and found its close enough with a few extra bits welded so have gone that way and still a work in progress.  After this got into modifying the intercooler with some bends and clamps. I was procrastinating on this as was not keen to cut up and weld it myself but happy with the outcome.  Onto the radiator shroud and oil cooler mount. This thing took way longer than I thought it would but having to add an extra oil cooler for the trans and wanting everything within the chassis rails its good enough for now. It mounts to the chassis and gives plenty of room for lines and pipes. All the coolers are rubber mounted and sealed the shroud on the top and sides, will use some tape to seal the bottom gap of about 10mm. 20250508_111500.mp4   Next job was to build the new diff and after a delay with a friend got built this week. I ended up putting it all together with supervision and was good to learn how to set one up correctly. I ended up going a 3.69 ratio, nismo 1.5 way gt pro with gtr Axel's. Stripped it all down, gave all the parts a good clean, pressed on new bearings and set backlash. Was good working in a clean assembly room with all the gear. Once got home wire wheeled the case and hit it with some rollbar/chassis black paint. Got a few more bits done but will leave them for the next update.
    • That could be drilled, ground and welded. Would stop it progressing and leaking. But that block shouldn't be pushed very hard, as what you see there is a massive warning sign. But that fix also isn't going to happen properly with the engine in the car, and assembled. So you're looking at anew block if you're doing all that work anyway.
×
×
  • Create New...