Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello friends,

The other day I snapped an axle and have been thinking about upgrading diffs. Spent a few hours trawling through and have settled on upgrading to a nismo 1.5 way for my daily r34 gtt (I have no hopes for finding a nice helical from an s15 or late r34 any time soon, and if I'm gonna spend 1k+ on a centre it might as well be the 'best' one). Naturally I could go with 38420-RSS15-B5, the default for the r34 gtt, however; since my axle has snapped and I haven't sourced a replacement yet (seeing them $600+ second hand - gross!), I was wondering if theres a particular stub axle with readily available/cheap axles from newer nissans (e.g. 350Z) that are as strong or stronger than the stock r34 ones.

This option has broadly complicated things as I wouldn't know where to begin with determining what shafts have what bolt patterns/lengths to fit my car, so I was hoping someone has some pre-existing knowledge to share.

While I'm at it, it's a mystery my axle broke spontaneously (admittedly during a pull). The road was wet, and I only only push 230kw at the moment - any reasons why it might just give up and die like that with my relatively weak car and poor traction conditions?

What bolt axle do you have 2x3 or 5x1? 5x1 is the better design.
How low is the car and what angle are the axles at? 
What was the condition of the axle? plenty of people running the standard gear with a lot of power & semi slicks.

Best upgrade is the 350z but will require a diff swap and I think a hub swap to suit the outer splines similiar to gtr.

 

I've got the 5x1. The car is lowered a fair bit - I see your point here. No idea, the cars seen a lot of action from the prior owners and lately from me so I guess it's a given eventually it wears out.

Regarding the 350z setup. I'm not down to go to the ~3.5 ratios the 350z runs. Currently I'm stock at 4.11, lowest I'd consider is 3.8. Getting a diff setup between 3.8 and 4.1 that accepts 350z axles and has a fully functional LSD (helical or mech) would be the dream. I have more research to do, thanks for your input.

Couldn't edit my post, sharing my discovery here:

https://www.leesonengineering.com.au/blog/r200-350zgtr5x1-stub-conversion/

This mob will convert your stubs to accept both 5x1 and 6x1 patterns. With this option available down the track, I'm going to go with the recommended nismo LSD for my car which will come with 5x1. I was considering trying to get something with 6x1 stubs to 'future proof' my drivetrain but couldn't figure out whether the diff centres in those kits would be different or not, risking fitment issues with my diff housing.

Balance almost certainly not important at that mass, diameter and location in the drivetrain. Balanced probably better, sure, but I'd be willing to bet the resulting vibrations from being left as is would be undetectable without reasonably precise gear.

Once thing I don't love is the vert close proximity of 2 of the holes. Not a lot of meat there. I know the flange to flange contact is still mostly there, but there would be a reasonable section of the axle's flange that overlaps the really close stub flange's hole - right where you would want to be transferring load. Again, probably about as important as the balance issue, but it still irks me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...