Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm in the process of swapping out my OEM turbos for GT2859s

There are a bunch of M12 & M14 & M18 copper washers for the oil and water lines.

Can anyone tell me the correct/OEM thickness for these?

The washers I have removed are 1mm thick and I assume that is more or less the same before they were originally tightened i.e. the crush is negligible.

The replacements I have are 1.3mm thick.

Not sure if the loss of bolt thread contact is an issue or not, especially for the banjo bolts that attach directly to the turbos.

I'm tempted to anneal the original washers but for some reason that doesn't feel right.

I'm probably over thinking but would value anyone's thoughts.

Would also like to understand why Nissan used two washers connected together for the Turbo oil inlet.

 

Thanks

Lee

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/483710-turbo-copper-washers/
Share on other sites

First up, Nissan didn't use 2 washers on the oil inlet which is the clue that it has all been apart previously and you may not be looking at factory washers anyway.

To work out if your 1.3mm washers are OK (I guess so), measure 2 washers + the banjo and subtract the length of the banjo bolt under the head to the end of the thread. As long the answer (ie, how far the bolt will go into the housing) is at least the same as the diameter of the bolt you are all good, probably even a little less is OK as these are hollow bolts anyway.

On 6/1/2022 at 8:39 AM, proline said:

I'm in the process of swapping out my OEM turbos for GT2859s

There are a bunch of M12 & M14 & M18 copper washers for the oil and water lines.

Can anyone tell me the correct/OEM thickness for these?

The washers I have removed are 1mm thick and I assume that is more or less the same before they were originally tightened i.e. the crush is negligible.

The replacements I have are 1.3mm thick.

Not sure if the loss of bolt thread contact is an issue or not, especially for the banjo bolts that attach directly to the turbos.

I'm tempted to anneal the original washers but for some reason that doesn't feel right.

I'm probably over thinking but would value anyone's thoughts.

Would also like to understand why Nissan used two washers connected together for the Turbo oil inlet.

 

Thanks

Lee

https://nissan.epc-data.com/skyline/bnr34/3957-rb26dett/engine/144/15188A/

Looking at the diagrams I don't see double washers. That sounds like an oil leak waiting to happen. The only exception is certain cases where there is a lock washer (split ring) and a flat washer.

So the two connected washers I'm talking about are labelled 15192F in the 3rd diagram on the page linked to in the response above. The OEM part number is 1518913C00. The two washers sit either side of a banjo but are connected by a strip of copper. As I said above this is for the oil inlet banjo bolt attached directly to the turbo (i.e the where a HKS 0.8mm restrictor bolt would go if needed) not the water/oil tube adapter that bolts to the turbo.

I've measured the amount of thread that will go into the housing and it is 5mm with the 1mm thick OEM washers and only 4.4mm with the new washers. The banjo bolt is M12 - hence my concern.

I've attached a photo to help explain the above showing the OEM washer and the thread depth with the new washers.

Love this forum. As someone who has zero access to GTR expertise and no mechanical background I find the posts here invaluable - thanks.

Lee

IMG_20220602_001500[2].jpg

The thickness difference you mention is negligible. As was said above, the connecting part is for ease of installation rather than needing to hold the inside washer in place while trying to line it up. New pipes with already attached banjo bolts sometimes have a plastic retainer that you rip off once you get the threads started. 

 

They're not that specific, just make sure they're thick enough to actually be crushed and not too thick that it reduces the thread engagement - both unlikely. So just get your diameters right and tighten it up. 

Oh and copper washers should not be doubled up. 

  • Like 1
On 02/06/2022 at 9:40 AM, proline said:

So the two connected washers I'm talking about are labelled 15192F in the 3rd diagram on the page linked to in the response above. The OEM part number is 1518913C00. The two washers sit either side of a banjo but are connected by a strip of copper. As I said above this is for the oil inlet banjo bolt attached directly to the turbo (i.e the where a HKS 0.8mm restrictor bolt would go if needed) not the water/oil tube adapter that bolts to the turbo.

I've measured the amount of thread that will go into the housing and it is 5mm with the 1mm thick OEM washers and only 4.4mm with the new washers. The banjo bolt is M12 - hence my concern.

I've attached a photo to help explain the above showing the OEM washer and the thread depth with the new washers.

Love this forum. As someone who has zero access to GTR expertise and no mechanical background I find the posts here invaluable - thanks.

Lee

IMG_20220602_001500[2].jpg

Just to add, that does not look like the correct banjo bolt. Not a washer issue, that bolt looks too short

  • Like 1

Thanks for all the replies - very useful.

That's definitely the correct banjo bolt. I've attached a picture of mine and the bolt indicated from the parts page linked to above.

It seems to me to have very little thread engagement but I assume Nissan know what they are doing and it hasn't leaked in the 22 years I have owned the car 🙂

A reduction of 0.6mm (2 x washers x 0.3mm) may not be significant for most bolts but I'm concerned that it is a relatively large amount for a bolt with such little thread engagement.

I'm leaning towards trying to source some 1mm thick washers or annealing the originals but would really appreciate any other comments.

 

OEM Banjo bolt.jpg

Banjo Bolt.jpg

On 6/2/2022 at 5:59 AM, proline said:

Thanks for all the replies - very useful.

That's definitely the correct banjo bolt. I've attached a picture of mine and the bolt indicated from the parts page linked to above.

It seems to me to have very little thread engagement but I assume Nissan know what they are doing and it hasn't leaked in the 22 years I have owned the car 🙂

A reduction of 0.6mm (2 x washers x 0.3mm) may not be significant for most bolts but I'm concerned that it is a relatively large amount for a bolt with such little thread engagement.

I'm leaning towards trying to source some 1mm thick washers or annealing the originals but would really appreciate any other comments.

 

OEM Banjo bolt.jpg

Banjo Bolt.jpg

Have you considered buying the OEM part? Seems to be pretty cheap.

"Seems to be pretty cheap."

Not where I'm based it's not especially when postage is thrown in. The M12 x 18 x 1mm spec washers are pretty rare here - they all tend to be 1.5mm or rubbish quality. Its seems though that that spec is used by some of the motorcycle manufacturers as OEM equipment and I have found a supplier so it looks like that's how I will proceed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...