Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm in the process of swapping out my OEM turbos for GT2859s

There are a bunch of M12 & M14 & M18 copper washers for the oil and water lines.

Can anyone tell me the correct/OEM thickness for these?

The washers I have removed are 1mm thick and I assume that is more or less the same before they were originally tightened i.e. the crush is negligible.

The replacements I have are 1.3mm thick.

Not sure if the loss of bolt thread contact is an issue or not, especially for the banjo bolts that attach directly to the turbos.

I'm tempted to anneal the original washers but for some reason that doesn't feel right.

I'm probably over thinking but would value anyone's thoughts.

Would also like to understand why Nissan used two washers connected together for the Turbo oil inlet.

 

Thanks

Lee

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/483710-turbo-copper-washers/
Share on other sites

First up, Nissan didn't use 2 washers on the oil inlet which is the clue that it has all been apart previously and you may not be looking at factory washers anyway.

To work out if your 1.3mm washers are OK (I guess so), measure 2 washers + the banjo and subtract the length of the banjo bolt under the head to the end of the thread. As long the answer (ie, how far the bolt will go into the housing) is at least the same as the diameter of the bolt you are all good, probably even a little less is OK as these are hollow bolts anyway.

On 6/1/2022 at 8:39 AM, proline said:

I'm in the process of swapping out my OEM turbos for GT2859s

There are a bunch of M12 & M14 & M18 copper washers for the oil and water lines.

Can anyone tell me the correct/OEM thickness for these?

The washers I have removed are 1mm thick and I assume that is more or less the same before they were originally tightened i.e. the crush is negligible.

The replacements I have are 1.3mm thick.

Not sure if the loss of bolt thread contact is an issue or not, especially for the banjo bolts that attach directly to the turbos.

I'm tempted to anneal the original washers but for some reason that doesn't feel right.

I'm probably over thinking but would value anyone's thoughts.

Would also like to understand why Nissan used two washers connected together for the Turbo oil inlet.

 

Thanks

Lee

https://nissan.epc-data.com/skyline/bnr34/3957-rb26dett/engine/144/15188A/

Looking at the diagrams I don't see double washers. That sounds like an oil leak waiting to happen. The only exception is certain cases where there is a lock washer (split ring) and a flat washer.

So the two connected washers I'm talking about are labelled 15192F in the 3rd diagram on the page linked to in the response above. The OEM part number is 1518913C00. The two washers sit either side of a banjo but are connected by a strip of copper. As I said above this is for the oil inlet banjo bolt attached directly to the turbo (i.e the where a HKS 0.8mm restrictor bolt would go if needed) not the water/oil tube adapter that bolts to the turbo.

I've measured the amount of thread that will go into the housing and it is 5mm with the 1mm thick OEM washers and only 4.4mm with the new washers. The banjo bolt is M12 - hence my concern.

I've attached a photo to help explain the above showing the OEM washer and the thread depth with the new washers.

Love this forum. As someone who has zero access to GTR expertise and no mechanical background I find the posts here invaluable - thanks.

Lee

IMG_20220602_001500[2].jpg

The thickness difference you mention is negligible. As was said above, the connecting part is for ease of installation rather than needing to hold the inside washer in place while trying to line it up. New pipes with already attached banjo bolts sometimes have a plastic retainer that you rip off once you get the threads started. 

 

They're not that specific, just make sure they're thick enough to actually be crushed and not too thick that it reduces the thread engagement - both unlikely. So just get your diameters right and tighten it up. 

Oh and copper washers should not be doubled up. 

  • Like 1
On 02/06/2022 at 9:40 AM, proline said:

So the two connected washers I'm talking about are labelled 15192F in the 3rd diagram on the page linked to in the response above. The OEM part number is 1518913C00. The two washers sit either side of a banjo but are connected by a strip of copper. As I said above this is for the oil inlet banjo bolt attached directly to the turbo (i.e the where a HKS 0.8mm restrictor bolt would go if needed) not the water/oil tube adapter that bolts to the turbo.

I've measured the amount of thread that will go into the housing and it is 5mm with the 1mm thick OEM washers and only 4.4mm with the new washers. The banjo bolt is M12 - hence my concern.

I've attached a photo to help explain the above showing the OEM washer and the thread depth with the new washers.

Love this forum. As someone who has zero access to GTR expertise and no mechanical background I find the posts here invaluable - thanks.

Lee

IMG_20220602_001500[2].jpg

Just to add, that does not look like the correct banjo bolt. Not a washer issue, that bolt looks too short

  • Like 1

Thanks for all the replies - very useful.

That's definitely the correct banjo bolt. I've attached a picture of mine and the bolt indicated from the parts page linked to above.

It seems to me to have very little thread engagement but I assume Nissan know what they are doing and it hasn't leaked in the 22 years I have owned the car 🙂

A reduction of 0.6mm (2 x washers x 0.3mm) may not be significant for most bolts but I'm concerned that it is a relatively large amount for a bolt with such little thread engagement.

I'm leaning towards trying to source some 1mm thick washers or annealing the originals but would really appreciate any other comments.

 

OEM Banjo bolt.jpg

Banjo Bolt.jpg

On 6/2/2022 at 5:59 AM, proline said:

Thanks for all the replies - very useful.

That's definitely the correct banjo bolt. I've attached a picture of mine and the bolt indicated from the parts page linked to above.

It seems to me to have very little thread engagement but I assume Nissan know what they are doing and it hasn't leaked in the 22 years I have owned the car 🙂

A reduction of 0.6mm (2 x washers x 0.3mm) may not be significant for most bolts but I'm concerned that it is a relatively large amount for a bolt with such little thread engagement.

I'm leaning towards trying to source some 1mm thick washers or annealing the originals but would really appreciate any other comments.

 

OEM Banjo bolt.jpg

Banjo Bolt.jpg

Have you considered buying the OEM part? Seems to be pretty cheap.

"Seems to be pretty cheap."

Not where I'm based it's not especially when postage is thrown in. The M12 x 18 x 1mm spec washers are pretty rare here - they all tend to be 1.5mm or rubbish quality. Its seems though that that spec is used by some of the motorcycle manufacturers as OEM equipment and I have found a supplier so it looks like that's how I will proceed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...