Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

Slightly overwhelmed by the amount of different forums on this page, so decided to post my queries on here, apologies in advanced if this isnt the right place to do it...

so this is my situation... TL:DR After around three years of saving, I took the plunge and bought myself an '94 R33 GTST. I Committed a cardinal sin and bought a car at night without checking it out during the day 馃ゲ. Granted, i did go on Vic roads and pay the two dollars to check the vin and it seems to be all checked out. Can someone let me know, from that can i be 100% certain that it hasn't been in an accident and can be registered? 

upgraded intercooler, upgraded turbo and from what I can see looks like a dump pipe from the turbo into the exhaust? will these things pass road worthy, and if not how should i go about it?

 

I feel like i could ask a million questions, but obviously i could do my own research to. Any help would be appreciated. 

 

Thanks, Lucas

 

 

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/483908-new-owner-rwc-queries/
Share on other sites

The RWC requirements are pretty clear actually in regards to what is checked during a RWC test in victoria.

One of the more stringent ones (it does note this out specifically now) is that the car's emissions system needs to be as factory from the air filter intake to the dump pipe.

If the car is currently registered it is fine to assume it is still able to be registered unless it is a WOVR vehicle, which means you need the reciepts for the damage that got the car off the WOVR register and back onto the road. Provided it's not been written off.

Other than the turbo/filter/intercooler situation most of the other considerations for RWC are safety related as well as modifications that fit under VSI8. This means wheels that are 1" wider than OEM, not sticking out past the guards, passing a noise check, brakes that work, no obvious oil leaks everywhere, seatbelts that work, wipers that work.

Anything that does not meet this needs to be presented with a VASS certificate. Those are generally reserved for registering a vehicle. As my car has been engineered, I'm actually not sure what the new buyer would need to provide, but I am going off on a tangent here.

As to what is stock and what looks stock, well the RWC tester is required to take photos. So it needs to look stock. ;). This goes for every car sold or RWC'ed for defects etc.

  • Like 2

If you don't have a friendly rwc guy, then it's best to make everything appear stock again. Don't give them a reason to take a deeper look.

I'd be fitting a stock side mount intercooler and covering any non standard holes, stock exhaust system and making sure there's no traces of leaking fluids underneath and then take it to somewhere like a Kmart auto for a rwc. They're generally not too fussy, I've found.

 

Good luck, let us know how you get on.

  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...

Hey Guys, really appreciate all your comments and heads up! Sorry i havent gotten back to you all sooner.

Ive agreed with one of my mates to split the payment for a stock fmic, since we both will be needing one to get our cars registered. In terms of making it look "stock", Ive also ordered an intake box for the pod filter.By the looks of it, thankfully, this car has been kept relatively stock.

Unfortunately, since posting this topic I've run into a few issues.

The "bigger" (ebay) turbo siezed on the drive home from my mechanic after getting a list of things to fix. So, that has since been replaced with a standard gtst turbo and confirmed working :D 

As I was waiting for a new turbo, i decided to test comp. it came back with some not so pleasing results... readings from cylinder 1-6 are as follows, 100, 95, 98, 90, 100, 98 馃槓 granted this may be due to the fact that the engine was cold and no oil was put into the cylinders. Either way seems like a pretty tired engine and looks like it may be due for a rebuild 馃檨  

Here comes the fun part tho. Found out my horn wasnt working and tl:dr now my car wont crank 馃槅. We concluded that the horn may not be working due to the a dodgy install of an aftermarket alarm system and immobilizer. Which, now has some how tripped and isnt unlocking with the key. went to have a look underneath the steering wheel and was greeted with a giant rat nest. ive started following all the cables and disconnected the immobilizer, however im just worried. Have I messed up by removing the immobilizer before unlocking it? If anyone could please let me know what the correct process is, as im slightly overwhelmed by this whole situation. Sorry for the overly long message...

Firstly, don't worry too much about the compression test results in the short term. If it is noticeably burning oil, or getting through oil between changes you can plan for a rebuild in your own timing.

Re the immobiliser, they can be a PITA, I've had a couple fail over the years. Even if you are familiar with wiring it might take some time to sort. Best to pull the trims off, unmount the fuse box and key wiring and start chasing carefully. Basic operation of the immobiliser is they will cut some key loom wires and run them through the immobiliser. Good ones use all same colour wires (generally black) to make them harder to trace quickly. You need to find which factory wires were cut and sent via the immobiliser, and then join them back together (same colour to same colour). Generally that would be ECU power, start signal, fuel pump etc but it depends on the installer and immobiliser how many and which circuits are controlled. 

The basic wiring context is battery power comes into the key, and then depending on key position it goes back out on the ACC, IGN and/or Start wires. From there the ACC and IGN (as well as BAT) go to the fuse/relays at the driver's knees. The immobiliser could be tapped in before but more likely after the fuse/relay box in individual circuits.

The other thing they almost always do is come with central locking so there will be separate wires for that, in that case they may have either cut or joined to, or just run in parallel factory wires. Your car will still open with the key even if you remove the immobiliser. 

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...
On 02/09/2022 at 6:37 AM, Duncan said:

Firstly, don't worry too much about the compression test results in the short term. If it is noticeably burning oil, or getting through oil between changes you can plan for a rebuild in your own timing.

Re the immobiliser, they can be a PITA, I've had a couple fail over the years. Even if you are familiar with wiring it might take some time to sort. Best to pull the trims off, unmount the fuse box and key wiring and start chasing carefully. Basic operation of the immobiliser is they will cut some key loom wires and run them through the immobiliser. Good ones use all same colour wires (generally black) to make them harder to trace quickly. You need to find which factory wires were cut and sent via the immobiliser, and then join them back together (same colour to same colour). Generally that would be ECU power, start signal, fuel pump etc but it depends on the installer and immobiliser how many and which circuits are controlled. 

The basic wiring context is battery power comes into the key, and then depending on key position it goes back out on the ACC, IGN and/or Start wires. From there the ACC and IGN (as well as BAT) go to the fuse/relays at the driver's knees. The immobiliser could be tapped in before but more likely after the fuse/relay box in individual circuits.

The other thing they almost always do is come with central locking so there will be separate wires for that, in that case they may have either cut or joined to, or just run in parallel factory wires. Your car will still open with the key even if you remove the immobiliser. 

Hi Duncan, once again apologies for the late reply, but really appreciate your response! it honestly gave me the confidence to tackle this issue myself and I can confidently say i learnt A LOT from it! Luckily for me, the wires were pretty easy to follow, and all it took was snipping off and the shitty connections and re-soldering the factory wires.

The last post from myself was before leaving for Europe as almost a cry for help. lol. But happy to say that the immobiliser was successfully removed and the wires returned to (mostly) factory! Oh the car starts and drives fine now too (sorta)... I honestly have no clue how the wiring underneath there got so bad. A rat's nest would be an understatement lol!! Ill add the photo's for you to enjoy XD 

Re: the curresnt issues im having with the car, should probably be for a separate thread. Although, I have managed to a few threads already with people having the same issues. So it'll definitely be a last resort thing!

 

Really appreciate everyones help!

IMG_7565.jpg

IMG_7815.jpg

  • Like 2

Great to hear you got the immobiliser out and are able to start the car now, and I'd have to say what you had under there is typical of many quick/cheap alarm installs I've seen over the years - no wonder they are causing problems 20 years down the track

You will need to double down on the wiring. Trace from source to application renewing dodgy connections.  Unwrap all insulation tape as you go, try to simplify the whole loom by removing as many solder etc connections as you can.  I have examples of wires that had 5 solder connections in under 30cm of length.  I also have examples of wiring that went from 8 to 6 gauge to 4 gauge then back to 8.  Heatshrink, connectors, crimping tools, and an airgun will be your friend.  Get some split tube and/or spiral wrap to help tidy up once done.

What you are doing is building in reliability while eliminating under dash fire risk.

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...

G'day guys,

 

Apologies for reviving an old thread.

Just wanted to say, we managed to register the car! Passed the RWC with a few minor adjustments. Airbox, horn, front wheel guards and a few little leaks here and there. Luckily, he didnt get me for the FMIC! 

The horn was probably the biggest issue as clocksprings for these cars are rather hard to find actually working... So I had to do a bit of a dodgy repair on mine to get it working.

Just wanted to say thanks to everyone who helped out!

 

Thanks, 

Lucas

  • Like 5

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you get 12v at one of the relay pins with IGN on, and 12v at another for about 3 sec when you turn the key from ACC to start, then yes you can just earth the relay trigger pin. Just have a look at the top of the relay, it should tell you which pin needs earth when the 12v signal is sent (or if it's not clear, just post the pic and we can work it out). If you always have 12v at 2 pins with IGN on, they it is earth triggered by the ECU which makes it harder to fix (you really need to check the ECU pin is earthing when it should, and if so it is a wiring issue from there to the relay.
    • Tomei make a 1.5mm restrictor, I'd just use that.
    • Got the gearbox in and the front drive shafts.
    • Hi There I went through a rabbit hole of reading about Xenon headlights and the ADR regulations for having them installed. As people have been defected by running factory xenon I was researching in ways to make them compliant. Everyone always say needs to be self leveling and have washer installed, which I don't necessarily agree with. For this argument I'm using R34 as reference as I'm more aware on the construction of the headlight compared to the R33 Xenon, which may still be the exact same case.   For the self leveling clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles As you can see the bold text "these manually adjustable devices from driver seats" are fine to use. As Series 1 Xenon model headlights do have a 4 level adjuster on the right near the ignition (however not series 2) then these model are consider compliant in that argument.   For the Self Cleaning aspect of this argument clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles Now i can understand the argument that Xenon will need a washer as they are over 2000 lumens, but I clicked on the 12 at the end of that sentence and it takes me to the end notes which states R34 for headlight lenses are plastic, not sure if PL is mark as I don't currently have my skyline to confirm that marking is there. But could you not technically get a lenses with the PL marking on it and then get away with the argument that you need a washer. I went through a quick read of the adr and might have missed something else that may cause them to be non-complaint.    But wouldn't these technically be complaint headlights   Would love to hear other people input on this and shed some light   Edit In regard to the the washer portion I might be mistaken ADR 45 (which I believe is Regulation NO.45) states 12 cd (candela) I dont understand that portion in regarding to calculating the candela if anyone can shed some light. Otherwise I guess throw in a washer for the headlight and you definitely comply.
    • Took it to all Japan day, flogged the hell out of it and took it all, am a very very happy man  don鈥檛 know how that ended up in Greg鈥檚 thread before
  • Create New...