Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

If using a race/serie damper :

- without AC, no relocation kit needed, it means that the steering pump pulley is aligned with the groove of the damper

- with AC, a relocation kit is needed, I would expect only to have a bracket for the AC compressor to move it forward however there is also another pulley and a bracket to move forward the steering pump which makes no sense ?

Obviously there is something I don't catch

Best regards

I'm pretty sure I've told you this all before in another thread. The deal is with the Ross race or gold series damper they are designed not to use ac and only has 2 pulleys standard, so where the ac belt would normally sit on the balancer that is a solid dampened area and then the power steering belt runs on the 2nd outer pulley in the factory alignment. Remember the ps is the very outside belt not the ac normally.

If you want to run ac they remove the outer damper ps pulley and put an ac pulley in that alignment then bolt the ps pulley on the outside of that pulley. This has the effect of moving both the ps and ac pulleys forward 25mm on the balancer, meaning you need the ac and ps relocation brackets to move the ps pump and ac compressor forward 25mm to realign with the balancer.

Relocation of the ps and ac forward 25mm means you cannot use the factory radiator fan anymore as it will hit - I measured my r32 and R33 GTRs for Ross to confirm that you can't run the ac relocation with a factory fan without hitting the ps. The 32 was somewhere around 16mm and the 33 was less at only 12mm. I believe the 34 is pretty much the same as the 33, but anyway none of the GTRs have 25mm + down there so it doesn't work unless you go thermo fans when relocating both ps and ac.

Hence why I ditched the whole ac relocate idea and went back to their current integrated trigger 800hp Tuffbond balancer as everything lines up like factory. Take their power ratings with a grain of salt - they are conservative on their power ratings and admitted themselves you can't actually rate a balancer in power. I'd suggest just get a Tuffbond unless you want to ditch the ac.

  • Thanks 1
13 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Surely this is just screaming out for either an electric AC compressor or an electric PS pump to solve the problem? Guessing PS pump the lower power/easier option.

To retain ps in factory alignment I'd say so for electric ac.

Obviously to keep ac belt driven you'd need electric ps and still need to relocate the ac 25mm.

1 hour ago, BK said:

To retain ps in factory alignment I'd say so for electric ac

My thinking is that mech driven AC comps use a couple of horsepower to drive them. So, if an elec AC comp was in some way super efficient and only used 1500W, it would still pull >100A on a 12V feed. I think the electric AC systems are from electric cars with much higher voltage supplies available.

On 28/12/2022 at 10:39 AM, GTSBoy said:

My thinking is that mech driven AC comps use a couple of horsepower to drive them. So, if an elec AC comp was in some way super efficient and only used 1500W, it would still pull >100A on a 12V feed. I think the electric AC systems are from electric cars with much higher voltage supplies available.

I agree with electric aircon being a no go from a high electrical load perspective, so with the Race or Gold dampers that brings you back to:

-Having to relocate the ac 25mm to keep it mechanical then go electric ps pump to be able to use your factory viscous fan

-The undesired approach to relocate ac and ps 25mm, ditch viscous fan and switch to thermos or

-Ditch the ac all together, run factory fan and not relocate ps.

I couldn't be f**ked doing any of those options when the Ross Tuffbond is factory alignment and will be fine unless you're looking at 700kw + or stupid 10k rpm stuff.

Thanks for all your reply !

I would prefer to keep the PS stock and elec AC is not really possible as you mention

 

@BK, indeed you already make some explanations but I didn't understood the purpose of the kit, now I do thanks to you

"If you want to run ac they remove the outer damper ps pulley and put an ac pulley in that alignment then bolt the ps pulley on the outside of that pulley. "

I didn't know the outer pulley was screwed to the damper itself !!! this is now 100% clear !

 

Couldn't we run the AC and PS on the same belt ? (so we need only to relocate AC )

Assuming ratio are ok

 

find in attachment some pictures of my r34 gtr

thumbnkail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

4 hours ago, bigboss59400 said:

Couldn't we run the AC and PS on the same belt ? (so we need only to relocate AC )

It's a lot of load for the one belt to have to pick up at the crank pulley and it would be difficult** to arrange the two pumps so that you go enough wrap on the crank pulley to do it.

**Potentially impossible to transmit sufficient torque even should you be able to locate them so that you can get the maximum wrap around the crank pulley.

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...