Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It's not OBD1. It's Nissan Consult. Their own protocol. It's easily readable with any workshop grade diagnostic handset that has Nissan config files. I did it (for HICAS diagnosis) with a generic workshop handheld on my car back in about 2000, immediately before I rendered HICAS unable to f**k with me any more.

And 10 years after that I ripped out every single HICAS related thing in the car, except the CU (which is needed to keep the power steering happy).

HICAS is the devil. It is made to make 7/10ths drivers look like 9/10ths drivers. But if you drive the car harder than 7/10ths, it actively tries to kill you. It is too stupid to handle real driving.

HICAS is also very hard to diagnose, because from what I can tell, the CU rapidly forgets codes if the initiating failure does not stay present. So you can really only diagnose it while it is in the process of losing its mind.

'twere I you, I would put a HICAS delete kit on the car. With decent upgrades to suspension arms/bushes, tyres and a wheel alignment, the car will turn in 11ty times better than the apparent improvement given by HICAS back in the dim nostalgia days of the late 80s.

  • Like 1
8 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

It's not OBD1. It's Nissan Consult. Their own protocol. It's easily readable with any workshop grade diagnostic handset that has Nissan config files. I did it (for HICAS diagnosis) with a generic workshop handheld on my car back in about 2000, immediately before I rendered HICAS unable to f**k with me any more.

And 10 years after that I ripped out every single HICAS related thing in the car, except the CU (which is needed to keep the power steering happy).

HICAS is the devil. It is made to make 7/10ths drivers look like 9/10ths drivers. But if you drive the car harder than 7/10ths, it actively tries to kill you. It is too stupid to handle real driving.

HICAS is also very hard to diagnose, because from what I can tell, the CU rapidly forgets codes if the initiating failure does not stay present. So you can really only diagnose it while it is in the process of losing its mind.

'twere I you, I would put a HICAS delete kit on the car. With decent upgrades to suspension arms/bushes, tyres and a wheel alignment, the car will turn in 11ty times better than the apparent improvement given by HICAS back in the dim nostalgia days of the late 80s.

im in agreeance with you there, Im actively looking at the different kits and what all is into locking it out and getting rid of the light aside from unplugging the bugger. I see tomei has a kit that you can basically falsify the A-OKAY  report back to the ECU, and uses shims. I imagine that is probably the way to go, but im checking out my options as we speak.

9 minutes ago, oSkylines said:

I see tomei has a kit that you can basically falsify the A-OKAY  report back to the ECU, and uses shims. I imagine that is probably the way to go, but im checking out my options as we speak.

Nah. Complete removal and destruction. The use of lockout collars and lockout bars, retaining the crappy old tie rods and tie rod ends is....the nasty 90s style way of doing things. These days you can get brackets that are used to mount to control arms that replicate the setup of non-HICAS rear ends. These are literally called HICAS delete kits, as opposed to the HICAS lockout kits of yestercentury. You can knock the ball joints out of the steering arm on the knuckles and replace with bushes or bearings that get rid of the slop.

What I did instead was replace the entire rear subframe with a non-HICAS one, pulled out the solenoid valves, plumbing and changed the PS pump (this is an R32 with an R34 motor in it, so was hydraulic HICAS, which is the worst of them all, and the R34 motor brought along its PS pump for a no effort contribution to the HICAS eradication programme). But I suspect that that will be a bit harder on a GTR. I could use an A31 Cefiro subframe which I found lying around.

And you don't need to worry about any happiness or otherwise of the HICAS CU and anything it might say to the ECU. For one thing, you have a Haltech and it simply won't care under any circumstances. But I don't think even the stock ECU would give 2 shits. It certainly doesn't in the R32. Remember, these are vintage cars. Not the heavily integrated shitboxen of the last 20 years.

  • Like 1
3 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Nah. Complete removal and destruction. The use of lockout collars and lockout bars, retaining the crappy old tie rods and tie rod ends is....the nasty 90s style way of doing things. These days you can get brackets that are used to mount to control arms that replicate the setup of non-HICAS rear ends. These are literally called HICAS delete kits, as opposed to the HICAS lockout kits of yestercentury. You can knock the ball joints out of the steering arm on the knuckles and replace with bushes or bearings that get rid of the slop.

What I did instead was replace the entire rear subframe with a non-HICAS one, pulled out the solenoid valves, plumbing and changed the PS pump (this is an R32 with an R34 motor in it, so was hydraulic HICAS, which is the worst of them all, and the R34 motor brought along its PS pump for a no effort contribution to the HICAS eradication programme). But I suspect that that will be a bit harder on a GTR. I could use an A31 Cefiro subframe which I found lying around.

And you don't need to worry about any happiness or otherwise of the HICAS CU and anything it might say to the ECU. For one thing, you have a Haltech and it simply won't care under any circumstances. But I don't think even the stock ECU would give 2 shits. It certainly doesn't in the R32. Remember, these are vintage cars. Not the heavily integrated shitboxen of the last 20 years.

well, i can say an entire subframe swap is not likely something ill get that far into, but I am watching a video right now about the delete kits that essentially just replace the control arms and stuff to lock it into place. So, if the haltech isnt gunna care about the HICAS system if i lock it out, I'll likely just do that then. I did read on one of the HICAS threads that you actually were on ( i think from like 2021) something about pumps potentially overheating or something , so ill have to re-find exactually what was being talked about there for context, but i think it was something along the lines of if you were just blocking things off, whereas if you just delete the whole rear hicas system , there shouldnt BE any pumps to overheat, so unless the concern would be with some other pump somewhere its probably a nonissue. That being said, cant hurt to re-read so i can make sure i dont bugger something up unintentionally out of ignorance. 

So the potential issue with the pump is that it has 2 stages, the first is for power steer and the second for hicas. If you just block off the second stage outlet it will kill the pump.  

You need to either:

-Open the pump and remove the rear pump vanes, then block the outlet, or

-Reroute the power steering lines so the second stage feeds the PS cooler (then back to the reservoir) and the first stage just does the steering rack.

-replace the factory pump with a single stage pump, keep in mind the number of ribs in the PS belt are different between R32 (4 rib) and R33 (3 rib)

-loop the HCAS feed back to the HICAS return near the diff, although this keeps a lot of unnecessary weight and leak opportunities

  • Like 1
10 minutes ago, oSkylines said:

something about pumps potentially overheating

3 minutes ago, Duncan said:

So the potential issue with the pump is that it has 2 stages,

This is all only true for R32, which had hydraulic actuation of the rear rack. The R33 onwards cars had electric rear racks, which obviate all the hydraulic concerns.

Edited by GTSBoy
Just now, GTSBoy said:

This is all only true for R32, which had hydraulic actuation of the rear rack. The R33 onwards cars had electric rear racks, which obviate all the hydraulic concerns.

if this is accurate with the R33 not having  this issue, that is quite good news.

49 minutes ago, oSkylines said:

if this is accurate with the R33 not having  this issue, that is quite good news.

If by "this" you mean only the hydraulic associated issues with deleting HICAS, and not the fact that electric HICAS is still equally capable of trying to kill you as hydraulic HICAS is, then yes. It is easier to get rid of R33 HICAS than it is on R32.

  • Like 1
10 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

If by "this" you mean only the hydraulic associated issues with deleting HICAS, and not the fact that electric HICAS is still equally capable of trying to kill you as hydraulic HICAS is, then yes. It is easier to get rid of R33 HICAS than it is on R32.

i was just referring to not having to worry about the pumps on the 33 overheating, since its not the hydraulic system and doesnt have the extra fins and pumps and shit running to the back. 

 

As for the HICAS being a death trap at one point or another, You have me sold on that. Well you, mixed with the fact that my car tried to do the cupid shuffle on its own , nearly taking out a motorcycle driver ( if it had been moving to the left instead of the right on its random swerve)

18 minutes ago, oSkylines said:

i was just referring to not having to worry about the pumps on the 33 overheating, since its not the hydraulic system and doesnt have the extra fins and pumps and shit running to the back. 

 

As for the HICAS being a death trap at one point or another, You have me sold on that. Well you, mixed with the fact that my car tried to do the cupid shuffle on its own , nearly taking out a motorcycle driver ( if it had been moving to the left instead of the right on its random swerve)

Almost every I know with an R32 GTR has some story about the HICAS trying to steer them in an unintended direction. The R33s seem more reliable in that regard. I'm pretty sure my HICAS is not locked out and I can't even really tell if it's working or not.

8 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

Almost every I know with an R32 GTR has some story about the HICAS trying to steer them in an unintended direction. The R33s seem more reliable in that regard. I'm pretty sure my HICAS is not locked out and I can't even really tell if it's working or not.

well, if the R33 is more reliable in this regard, maybe i am just wildly unlucky. Either way , If im planning on making changes in the near future by way of increasing power , after this week, I want mine off and in a dumpster somewhere. The injectors are the last part im waiting for to upgrade my fuel system at the moment, and then I have to run a few logs for my tune, one of which being a WOT run. Last few times i did my WOTs i was somewhere up in the 130ish mph area... I dont even want to know what would would've happened if my HICAS decided to go rogue on me when I'm doing my WOTs for tuning. 

Edited by oSkylines
4 hours ago, oSkylines said:

well, if the R33 is more reliable in this regard, maybe i am just wildly unlucky. Either way , If im planning on making changes in the near future by way of increasing power , after this week, I want mine off and in a dumpster somewhere. The injectors are the last part im waiting for to upgrade my fuel system at the moment, and then I have to run a few logs for my tune, one of which being a WOT run. Last few times i did my WOTs i was somewhere up in the 130ish mph area... I dont even want to know what would would've happened if my HICAS decided to go rogue on me when I'm doing my WOTs for tuning. 

I have had two separate R32 owners tell me about 2-3 incidents where they were either in a turn and the HICAS was trying to make the car go straight or they were going straight and the rear end was crabbing out to try and make the car turn. Neither could get it to reproduce again afterwards. It absolutely destroys confidence in a car when the system can randomly misbehave like that. My R33 doesn't do that but I have heard of bad yaw sensors causing behavior like the rear end crabbing out under braking or excessive vibration/exhaust noise doing something similar as well. The R32 doesn't have any form of feedback control and as far as I can tell the HICAS is really far more aggressive compared to the R33.

HICAS in the R32 and R33 both belong in the bin.

First real handling mod I did was delete HICAS, followed by a proper mechanical LSD (albeit I have a GTS-t shit box).

R34 HICAS is barely ok, if I had a R34 I would delete it as well.

2 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

I have heard of bad yaw sensors causing behavior like the rear end crabbing out

No yaw sensors in HICAS. It's usually the steering angle sensor, but also can originate in the HICAS CU. The Oz delivered R32 GTRs had a factory recall to repair the CUs which sometime had a loose screw running around inside shorting shit out, and electrolytic capacitors all eventually reach EOL, etc etc.

 

2 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

The R32 doesn't have any form of feedback control

No HICAS has any form of closed loop. It just sends out the "wiggle the rear end signal" when it thinks you'd like it to turn in. If that happens to be when you are sawing away at the wheel trying to fight understeer midcorner on a wet track, then so be it!

37 minutes ago, niZmO_Man said:

My HICAS actively tries to kill me (random kicks in the steering, rear end is looser than a drunk 18 year old at Ivy).

That 1986 shit should go straight in the bin.

Please delete it.

  • Like 1
11 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

No yaw sensors in HICAS. It's usually the steering angle sensor, but also can originate in the HICAS CU. The Oz delivered R32 GTRs had a factory recall to repair the CUs which sometime had a loose screw running around inside shorting shit out, and electrolytic capacitors all eventually reach EOL, etc etc.

 

No HICAS has any form of closed loop. It just sends out the "wiggle the rear end signal" when it thinks you'd like it to turn in. If that happens to be when you are sawing away at the wheel trying to fight understeer midcorner on a wet track, then so be it!

image.thumb.jpeg.89539a505f7ffa85e5a8fb421945bbed.jpeg

As far as I know there's actually a yaw sensor in the back of the R33 and R34 GTR which is used for HICAS. It vaguely helps maybe. In practice the R33 and R34 group N cars AFAIK kept the yaw sensor but deleted the HICAS and fed the signal into the ATTESA/ABS controller instead to control the A-LSD.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...