Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello !

I'm building an engine for my Skyline R33.

I want to use the RB26 shaft in the RB26 block.

Configuration:
RB25 S2 engine block
RB25DET NEO cylinder head
Mahle Motorsports RB25DET S2 87.00mm forged pistons
Forged H-Beam connecting rod 119.5mm
Crankshaft RB26DETT

Will this configuration be ok? I'm still thinking about converting the pistons from S2 to NEO pistons using a milling machine. I'm worried about the compression ratio. I already have all the parts except the connecting rods.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/485183-rb25det-crankshaft-from-rb26/
Share on other sites

You’ll need a 26 piston due to the pin being in a slightly higher position to compensate for the increased stroke, you can then machine the crown to take the compression to where you want it to be 

3 hours ago, Dawid20 said:

I want to use pistons from RB25 but use forged 119.5mm connecting rods and additionally adapt the pistons to the NEO head.

Your pistons will be 1mm below block deck which means less ideal squish/quench so may be easier to knocking.

Stock 25det : 121.5mm rod length + 31.5mm piston height + 35.85mm half stroke = 188.85mm.

Your combo 119.5mm rod length + 31.5mm piston height + 36.85mm half stroke = 187.85mm.

Sell your pistons and buy rb26 pistons, mill down its dome to get proper CR for rb25det neo head, that way you have proper piston to deck clearance/squish and uses common rb25/26 121.5mm rods which also have better rod/stroke ratio than less available shorter 119.5mm rods.

If have to use rb25 piston with 121.5mm rod, pistons will be 1mm above block deck :

121.5mm rod length + 31.5mm piston height + 36.85mm half stroke = 189.85mm

Can use thicker head gaskets to compensate pistons above block deck, cometic has rb25det 87mm head gasket thickness of 1.8mm, 1.9mm, 2mm, 2.5mm, that will work fine with pistons 1mm above block deck :

https://www.cometic.com/applications/automotive/nissan/rb-series/rb25det--152ci25l-i6

  • Like 3
19 minutes ago, silviaz said:

I heard rb25 neo engines use a rb26 crank, is this true? I can't find any info on it and the part numbers are different. Makes me wonder for the neo engine since there are less parts, what do you do if the crank is completely stuffed.

They use rb26 rods, not an rb26 crank. The throw of the crank determines the capacity of the engine (rb25 vs rb26) as the bore diameter is the same

  • Like 1

Here's some previous threads from this very site.

This one didn't resolve very clearly.

 

This one shows the compression situation

One where I piped up with the usual comment, and @r32-25t with his ditto, and some other useful tidbits.

 

If it were me doing it (and I might, if I ever have to build my 25, because I have access to a 26 crank if I want it, despite me previously saying that it's hardly worth the effort), I'd just call up Nitto and say, "Hey, here's my plan, what piston can you magic up for me?", and leave it to them to make a nice forgey with the required combo of pin height and crown volume. They probably use the same blanks for all their RB pistons anyway, and just carve out what needs to be carved out as required.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...