Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey All! I have a bit of a problem

I bought a power FC for my auto 34 but recently found out it wont work!!!!! so now I need to find a good computer that will work- considering theres a few ppl on here with autos I was wondering if anyone knows of any???

AboBob if you see this have you looked at this for yours by any chance??

thanks people!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/49298-r34gtt-auto-computer/
Share on other sites

Wolf 3d causes shift problems. You can use an emanage. Check the What is the Greddy Emanage thread which is stickied in the Forced Induction section.

Also I started a thread called Info for GTT Tiptronic owners here http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...light=tiptronic

Mine is a one off at the moment but I will let everybody know when you can get them for yourselves.

If you want you can come over on the weekend some time and I'll take you for a spin so you know what a modified stock ECU is capable of.

Bit of a messy dyno run here but you get the picture http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=49209

Yeah I spoke to PowerPlay and they mentioned the Greddy Emanage to me aswell- I think they can get them?? but they're also pretty expensive from what Ive heard.. Power play also said they have an ECU ROM they had made themselves for the autos but its $2500 for a 29kw increase and I dont know what happens if you get more mods for it later..

u pretty much can use any of the local computers as long as u retain the factoy computer to run the tipronic...what needs to be done is to piggy back the unit onto ur standard comp....emanage can do this but i heard there not that great....haltech,microtech,ems....will all work...i personally favour the haltech...cheers!

The Haltech one sounds like it could be good!!! any idea on when its released??

As far as the Apexi one goes I plugged it in and turned it on and checked the warning lights and they were ok- but I didnt try and drive it though cause I dont have a hand controller and I wasnt sure what sort of tune is on it... The main problem only happens apparently while its driving

I guess you could put a uni chip in if its available but you cant tune them as well as a full comp or piggy back

Did you try the Power FC, or did you just listen to the rumours?

I have a PFC in my series 1 R33, and it works well, yet I have heard others say they have had trouble.

The Power FC cannot control the tiptronic auto gearbox in the R34 GTT's hence why it can't be used. The only ECU that can is the Nissan OEM ECU

Not rumours... Fact

The Haltech one sounds like it could be good!!! any idea on when its released??

As far as the Apexi one goes I plugged it in and turned it on and checked the warning lights and they were ok- but I didnt try and drive it though cause I dont have a hand controller and I wasnt sure what sort of tune is on it... The main problem only happens apparently while its driving

I guess you could put a uni chip in if its available but you cant tune them as well as a full comp or piggy back

i think ur refering to the haltech interceptor comp...its targeted to compete with stuff like unichip and emanage ....'inside goss forot to tell u' its not available for skylines!!! only ford xr6 and wrx's.....it all comes down to budget!!!!!! put out a price ur willing to spend and get the best computer for it :) the top of the range haltech was put on a manual r34 ie. e11v2 the owner said it was better than standard if that is any indication...in terms of economy and power :headspin: :headspin:

theres a guy in the for sale section who can mod the stock ecu and remove boost and fuel cuts and take off other limits and optimize a/f ration for about $300 i tihnk it is. the thread is titled r32 / r33 ecu remap. he can do r34 as well, which should do the auto fine as its the original oem ecu

Can't you just run the PFC as a piggyback and get it to control everything else except the Auto??

Hope so, cause I was getting the AP-PFC with this in mind for my R32 GTS4 RB20 Auto.

It should be able to handle all the std sensors etc I would have thought.

The ECU I have at the moment was custom tuned by Martin Donnon & Simon at Morpowa after driving it to Adelaide. (170Kw) BUT I cant drive to Adelaide every time I change something :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...