Jump to content
SAU Community

Official SAU Dyno Day V.2 Review Thread ***PICS*** v.56kdie


Recommended Posts

Well today saw the running of the second official dyno day at Unique Autosports dyno room in Castle Hill.

Though the day started slow with many people enjoying a Saturday sleep in, the carpark began to pack rapidly with a huge assortment of skylines and other high performance cars.

Congratulations must go to the individual class winners who were up against some stiff competition.

Results are listed below:

Award winners

Top RB20DET standard turbo - Silver GTS-T (R32 GTS-T) 150.6 Kw

Runnerup RB20DET standard turbo - Kinks (R31 w/ RB20DET) 144.5 Kw

Note: There were no modified turbo RB20DET's in attendance so a runnerup category for standard turbo was put in its place.

Top RB25DET standard turbo - R33vit (R33 GTS-T) 197.6 Kw

Top RB25DET modified turbo - B-Man (R33 GTS-T) 327.9 Kw

Top RB26DETT/RB30 standard turbos - Dave (R32 GTR) 249.5 Kw

Top RB26DETT/RB30 modified turbos - Antonio (RB30 Powered R33 GTS-T) 319.5 Kw

Zoom Magazine Encouragement award - Wilch (R33 GTS-T Series 2)

Overall competitor summary:

R33 GTS-T

B-Man - 327.9 Kw

Antonio - 319.6 Kw

Jimbo - 215.1 Kw

Sparki_D - 215 Kw

R33vit - 197.6 Kw

Goldrays - 181.6 Kw

Scott - 180.2 Kw

Ash - 173.0 Kw

Wilch - 166.9 Kw

Neil - 159.8 Kw

Eden - 158.3 Kw

R32 GTS-T

Silver GTS-T - 150.6 Kw

Cereal_Killer - 137.8 Kw

GTR

CNG - 301.3 Kw

Dave - 283 Kw

GTR032 - 188.6 Kw

Misc Entries

Grant - Soarer - 263.2 Kw

Andrew - Supra Twin Turbo - 246.2 Kw

Stewart - E46 M3 - 183.9 Kw

Haroon - S13 Silvia - 158.6 Kw

Kel - 350z - 156.9 Kw

Kinks - R31/RB20DET - 144.5 Kw

Sean - Supra Non-Turbo - 111.4 Kw

Carlo - Supercharged MR2 - 87.2 Kw

Chris - Datsun 240z - 67 Kw

Duncan - Datsun 200B - 49.7 Kw

Thankyou to all of you who attended today for making it a truely great day for all!

dsc01335.jpg

dsc01330.jpg

dsc01352.jpg

dsc01349.jpg

dsc01353.jpg

dsc01371.jpg

dsc01378.jpg

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

good day

did 321 GO have a turn?

and whos posting up photos???????????????????????????????????????????

sure did. Andrew made 178rwkw if memory serves me correctly.

I'm really disappointed with my dismal dyno effort. I have no idea why it was so low. I made 131.7rwkw previous with just a 3" dump / front pipe. Now with a full 3" including high flow cat, front mount and pod filter I managed a shocking 137.8. Very confused. :(

congrats to BMan for the highest figure of the day.

Yep Andrew's 321GO RB20 R32 GTS-T made 178rwkw with E Boost set at 15psi standard RB25 turbo, FMIC and full 3 inch exh. Also Dave's GTR who won RB26 stock turbo went back on dyno last and sorted out boost controller and made 280 somethingrwkw. Yes it was a big day and thanks to SAU gang for the biggest ever Dyno Day we have had. Thanks Uncle Nick and Carlo. Lots of good pics including that immaculate purple GTR.

PS. I had my third V drink in my life. Hope I can sleep tonight. I think I might be dreamin Skylines.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...