Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Is there much performance difference between the manual and auto versions of the r32 or r33 GTS-t skylines?

I am still not sure which model I will get. I have seen a few cheaper automatic versions of the r33.

Are the Automatics more reliable then the manuals? I naturally will do minor performance upgrades along the way, but i don't want something thats just going to sux my bank balance dry with breakdowns.

thanks folks :jawa:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/49999-difference-in-performance-with-auto/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i'm sure everyone is going to jump on here and bag the auto's down to the ground...

but as an auto R32GTSt driver i can say it is still quick in modded form... quicker than a modified manual tx5 turbo that's guaranteed (he he)

i am running a trannie cooler though and at $80 tis a worthy investment for your auto.

one advantage is that taking off is easier to get it consistently good with the auto as you can actually start spooling the turbo on the line. also with the 'power' button it holds gears to the redline for more fun

you would have to be a very good manual driver to consistently get better takeoffs than an auto IN MY OPINION

and as its my opinion i reserve the right to post it

*ready for the flames!*

Waz.

r33 autos are fairly quick (quicker than many would probably expect)

myslef and a manual mr2 turbo were neck and neck over the quarter and both were stock. considering the mr2 is fairly lighter, it goes to show that auto r33 shouldnt be laughed at straight away.

but the preferred choice is manual as you can do more with them and once you learn the ideal shifs and how to do these shifts well, the manual really shows its superiority.

you just have to get what is the most efficient choice for you...

Auto skylines are really good to drive. Modding wise there cant be too much power loss difference as my 33 gtst pulled 172rwkw on the dyno. Mods are pod, 10psi, cat back. they are good for city driving too.

I am a fan of the auto, great when you want to cruze, quick off the line, only drawback I can see is if you want a serious track car, then it might be worth going to a manual.

I also recall someone on these forums running a 12 second quarter with very little more than 215rwkw. (not too many manual drivers can do this with this level of power)

PS - check out the cost/price the others are paying for clutches, I could buy 2 or 3 autos and install them for that sort of money. (autos are dirt cheep at the wreckers if you haggle, as 95% of guys convert to or drive manuals and the wreckers are usually happy to move them out of the shop)

I can't belive some of you are supporting auto's..

I owned an auto skyline for about 1 month before it drove me nuts and I chucked a manual in it. Never had a auto again.

Auto is good for cruising.. it ends there.

(waits for people to talk about drag auto's etc)

Onyl one problem is that you cant launch :D

dont bag the auto yet... yes you can launch hard. just stall it, step on the brake and rev it up while in D. takes practice to find the right rev, and you'll take off like a jet. with tranny cooler and uprated torque converter, it can easily smoke any manual r33. most perf workshop shy away from auto as the performance market still leans towards the manual box, plus most aftermarket ecu works only with manual. but its not limiting to auto potential, as if you do the right mod, it'll be a very fast car. stock auto trans ecu logic can sometimes feel a bit slow in downshift or shifting up before you really want it, but with a little bit of electrical tweak or maybe aftermarket auto trans controller, those issue can be ironed out. seen somewhere a guy use steering wheel up/down button to control auto box just like a triptronic/sequential style, now that'll feel close to an f1 style box.

i myself prefer manuals cos i've been a manual driver for over 15 years, cant stand leaving my left food resting on the dead pedal all the time, it itched, it wanna play with the clutch, so i had to say bye bye auto and get the manual box ;-) sometimes i wish i do still have the auto especially in traffic. but what the heck, my left foot need practice.

yes, they're quite good and strong auto box, ppl just underrate them as they can do more with the right upgrade. but still a bit slushy though, what i heard one of the better auto box from jpn is the one from 2.5TT soarer. they're more responsive than r33 autos, however dun think they will bolt on to RB without some serious hacking, swearing and hair pulling. :D

Well i opened a can of worms. But thanks for the info. I appreciate it. I just wanted to make sure the auto wasn't a dog . I will hoping to buy something in the next month.

I just remembered a performace DVD, or was it high octaine, (i will just have to look through them all again, what a pity) that had an auto r33 and the workshop that worked on the car had it doing massive wheel spins down the road in third. Just smoked this car with an auto. Think it was standard tranny. Motor wasn't. If anyone is interested just post and I will find out which one it was in. Was awsome smoking action. damn. Now i will have to find out now or i won't sleep.

Dang it, it would be the one I lent a mate. Guess he will be getting a call in the morning :wassup:

I doubt an Auto R32 with 16psi of boost, exhaust and fmic will run a 5.2-5.6 sec 0-100. :)

Saying that I've thought about the idea of an Auto behind the RB30DET.

The increase in fuel consumption is what gets me worried.

What sort of fuel consumption are you blokes getting in your Auto's?

When I had a VL I picked up around 80km's per tank by converting to manual.

bout a second difference between a manual and auto r33 gts-t to 100km/h

dunno bout the quarter

i read somwhere or am remembering hearing from somewhere that an auto r33 is 0.6 seconds slower than the manual r33 over the quarter. So that will place it at 15 flat i suppose. although i have seen a stock auto r33 (filter is the only mod) do 14.6 down the quarter. :)

bout a second difference between a manual and auto r33 gts-t to 100km/h

dunno bout the quarter

not tht much,

autos suck for drifting, track racing and cos they get hot quick but in terms of performance they arent that far off a manual.

Get a stall converter, and you will be faster than the manual equivelant.

ive pulled a few 2.1 60ft times the first time i ever went to the track, best ET of 13.8@102.4mph running 0.7bar, stock turbo, no ecu, no dump, standard auto etc :)

not tht much

manual

RB25DET 2498cc DOHC 24 valve EFI Straight 6 Turbo 187kw @ 6400rpm 295nm @ 4800rpm 7000rpm 1390 kg 6.18 seconds 14.39 seconds

auto

damnit, cant find the auto stats

i think they were in an autospeed story

it was definately reported that the autos were 1 second slower to 100k/m

makes sense, u cant launch an auto anywhere near as hard as a manual

actually, i dont know why ud bother with an auto in a car as awesome as a skyline

u auto boys are missing out :)

I have an auto R33 it goes quite hard it has a few mods exust bov boost control and there is an ecu that you can get for the auto r33 its a uni chip i have just had it installed on mine it gave me an extra 20 kw's @ the wheels the autos are a good car to drive but if you like having fun like drifting and things like that i would get a manual but i have 190kws at the wheels boosted only to 9.5 and its mostly standard so u can get a lot of power out of an auto too in the end it comes down to how you drive.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Not a problem at all Lithium, I appreciate your help regardless. I've pulled a small part of a log where the target pressure was 28psi and it spiked to 36.4psi. I've only just begun using Data Log Viewer so if I'm sending this in the wrong format let me know.
    • Sorry had a bit of a week and haven't had heaps of time to follow this, so apologies if I've missed something - any chance of showing a log with the rpm, turbo speed, MAP, and wgdc all in one view? Definitely an "interesting" problem, and while it's definitely worth noting that there was a similar issue with the twins I'd not completely put all bets on the root cause being the same thing.  Keep an open mind, follow the data.
    • I built this engine approximately 12 years ago so my own head (brain) is a little grey on the exact hardware in the RB head, however what I recall is. Stock RB25 NEO TURBO Intake Camshaft HKS 260 degree Exhaust Camshaft (R34 GTR) RB25 NEO Turbo Springs  I ported/removed the exhaust stud humps found in the RB25 head so theres less turbulence but it wasn't ported/polished properly, just a hump removal. I've attached two pictures of the before and after to illustrate.     The ECU gets its boost reference from the nipple on the rear of the head on the intake side, behind the fuel rail. The wastegate gets its boost reference from a nipple on the cooler pipe immediately after the comp cover.  Could a decent pressure drop across the intercooler cause the wastegate to be seeing a higher PSI than what the ECU is seeing, and thus it can't control it accurately and quick enough?   We ran a line to the actuator and watched it open and close using an air compressor, while we didn't have a gauge on the line to see when it was cracking open, it was opening smoothly.  I just removed the gate now and even though the documentation says you need to open it in a vice due to preload (which I did), there wasn't any preload on the cap, which is something we noticed straight out of the box as well when new. This silver cap internally is threaded to the actuator rod that runs out the bottom of the straightgate. Not sure how I'm supposed to get this spring out to be frank.. Potentially but everyone else doesn't appear to have to stop at 500kw because of 6boosts design.  I would, but I think I'm getting to that point where if I'm going to do the head and make another 100kw, then I'm going to need a fancy gearbox and quite a few other things and 10k becomes 20k becomes 30k within a few months. I'm not necessarily sold on the idea just yet that the head is restrictive at 4000rpm (and what.. 300kw?) and yet doesn't seem to be restrictive at 7000rpm when it's making 500kw, however I'm obviously not closing the door on that theory.
    • Yeah - Half the problem is I know this sensor actually goes to 150C.. I'm pretty certain it is min of 11C. So still more data required I suppose. It's really quite hard to get the oil temp to 100+ then immediately pull over and take a reading before the temp drops. Annoyingly I suppose the range I really 'want' is likely 80 -> 120C. TBH the ecu can't really *do* anything with it, and the gauge itself is very visible... ...but you know how it is.
    • My EFR 8474 Black, made 800awhp on a roller dyno. at 25-26psi. E85. Shaft speed was around 106,000rpm 1.01 rear. The rear is maxed.  6 boost Turbosmart 60mm gate 3.5inch exhaust  Head is worked to the shithouse. Bain racing. VCam. 272 exhaust. RB28 - RB26 foundation.  You have an intake issue. Start getting proper data and I mean go back to the simple things.  - Pressure test your intake - Block off the Turbo BOV, you don't need it.  - Test pressure before and after your intercooler If your head is pretty stock, that is your issue. Especially if it is NA.  Take it off and spend $10k on it. 
×
×
  • Create New...