Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

its pretty much the same as any other 33 u see on the road...hehe. 400r's are as common as assholes but thats not to say that they dont look good. i actually preferr the series 2 spoiler over the gtr one. tryhard is when u put gtr badges on it which this one doesnt have so its alright.

1 thumbs up from me because its a nice colour.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50555-400r-bodykit/#findComment-1003666
Share on other sites

Imo, anything is better than stock for looks (except maybe the Veilside monstrosity). I have the exact same front bar, and it looks great, but it's a pain in the arse to drive with as it's so low. Most people on the forums don't mind this though, so I could be in the minority here. If you don't mind going up driveways sideways, then get it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50555-400r-bodykit/#findComment-1004070
Share on other sites

Big thumbs down. Mesh looks horrible, bar looks like it belongs to an entirely different car (the bar is all angles, the car is all curves and smooth surfaces).

Either ditch the bar, or make some changes to the rest of the car so the bar looks like it belongs. At least that's what I would do :mad:

LW.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50555-400r-bodykit/#findComment-1006847
Share on other sites

thanks guys i think i agree with that...the R33 m-spec bodykits give it the subtle smooth lines it should have..think i'll stick with something like that...wat about standard spoiler...do people like the S2 or S1 spoilers?? or GTR spoilers???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50555-400r-bodykit/#findComment-1006861
Share on other sites

yeah thanks i fully agree some people like it some don't...thanks for the support. i think the car would look good if it was beefed up on the sides n made more agressive but when it's standard i think it the smooth lines look good so i mite stick with something like that but thanks for the feedback

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50555-400r-bodykit/#findComment-1006875
Share on other sites

thanks guys i think i agree with that...the R33 m-spec bodykits give it the subtle smooth lines it should have..think i'll stick with something like that...wat about standard spoiler...do people like the S2 or S1 spoilers?? or GTR spoilers???

Personally I prefer the S1 spoiler on a stock R33 GTS-t, unless the car has a suitable front bar, then a S2 can work well. I don't like the R33 GT-R spoiler at all (although I realise I am probably in the minority)

Have you thought of maybe have no spoiler? If you want to get rid of the "fin" look, you can get a small spoiler, or one of those URAS-type spoilers that makes the boot completely flat. Looks schmick on GTS-t's IMHO.

LW.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50555-400r-bodykit/#findComment-1006877
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...