Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok my rings or ring lands just went out on my RB25DET and am going to be taking it to the machine shop once the season ends. As of right now I plan on putting Wiseco pistons in (8.4:1), ARP head studs, shot peen the stock rods, and 1.5mm metal head gasket. How much power do you think this setup is capable of? There is a guy here in the USA that made 586rwhp on the stock RB25DET motor (not even an aftermarket headgasket or studs). I am thinking I should be good to about 700hp.

After all the machine work is done I am going to be making an adapter stud plate for the exhuast manifold and intake manifold and will be putting on the RB26 twin manifolds with Z31 turbos on (capable of around 600hp) and also the RB26 surge tank with the indavidual throttle bodies off and a RB25 throttle body welded on the end. I also just purchased HKS cam gears and am wondering if I can run both of them or if I can just run the intake cam with the VVT? or is it better to cancel out the VVT and run both HKS cam gears?

This is in my USDM 240sx if wanted to know. I am shooting for a low 11's on this setup if not lower. Traction is going to be the problem. Going to be a cheap setup, but to me that's the way to go ($2000 into all the parts and machine work for the internals and $2000 into all the bolt-ons (turbos, manifolds, injectors, etc...)

Any suggestions would be great.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50834-my-rb25-build-up-and-questions/
Share on other sites

Sounds like it will be an absolute pig to drive on the road with that low compression and a metal head gasket which would lower the CR even more, but only a little. Otherwise, I would expect a good quarter mile machine.

I've used the standard gasket and GTR conrods with Arias forged pistons and have O ringed the block. The GTR rods are much sturdier and a cheap insurance and are usually a straight fit. There are a few sets for sale on the forum and you may just need a resize on the big ends to ensure perfect fit and is my only suggested change to your plan.

Don't try to tap the head to locate the exhaust manifold studs but cut and weld the manifold instead. Also if you could get an Australian Falcon 80mm (I seem to recall) throttle body that would help from my understanding of such things.

deffinately change the rods if you have a early rb25 and if chasing more than 600hp i would go new rods anyway, cheap for you in the states.

I have seen the rb26 manifols used with a plate bolted to the head with countersuck bolts to the head and then studs to the manifols, a lot easier than cutting welding the manofolds but does crate more places for things to go wrong

My 20 cents worth..........

By the time you do the work to the RB25 cylinder head, it would be chepaer to buy an RB26 top end and sell the RB25. RB26's have a lot of other advantages, solid followers, valve springs, valves, collets, valve seats, combustion chambers, water jackets etc etc. Plus you have a much greater choice of cams at half the cost. Std RB26 cams are much better than std RB25's, if you want to save some money.

Until you get over 750 bhp there is no reason to change the throttle bodies, waste of time and money for no good reason. Unless you have a crappy ECU that can't handle multiple throttle bodies and the complex MAP sensor signals they produce.

No VVT on the RB26 cylinder head.

Low 11's, with decent tyres and propper suspension setting I would be looking at a low 10. There area few R33 Skylines here running 9's with ~650 bhp, and you have a weight advantage on them.

RB25 conrods are nitrided, shot peen just bounces off, doesn't do much. Waste of time, Geoff;'s suggestion of RB26 rods is much better. For the price of forged rods in the US, personally I'd be using them, build it once build it right.

Hope that helps :)

What about 9:1 CR instead of 8.4? Add alcohol injection..

We have 2 stock RB25's in the US that have pushed near 600rwhp with 9:1 CR and stock HG's.  Why not try 700hp with  9:1 with a metal HG and forged pistons?

Standard rod bolts?

Low 11's, with decent tyres and propper suspension setting I would be looking at a low 10.  There area few R33 Skylines here running 9's with ~650 bhp, and you have a weight advantage on them.

Hi, just wondering are those skylines GTR's or GTST's and are they very streetable? Also I'm guessing you buy a Gtst 33 for say 16K but to get it into 9's would cost another 16K?

Hi, just wondering are those skylines GTR's or GTST's and are they very streetable? Also I'm guessing you buy a Gtst 33 for say 16K but to get it into 9's would cost another 16K?

GTST's and they are quite streetable, not everyday and unless engineered, not legal either. As for budget, you won't get much change out of $30K for the necessary upgrades.

Thanks for all the information. I think I will be sticking to the RB25 head. I would love to get a hold of an RB26 head, but would be looking more then I want to spend or would spend on the RB25 head. I will not be drilling and tapping the head or block in order to have the RB26 intake and exhuast manifolds to work, it is simply an adapter plate with two extra studs. Going to make them with my friend and will be made for under $100. As I said, wish I could do the RB26 head, but don;t have the money for that. Anyone have a set of GTR stock rods?

Also would you guys recommend getting rid of the VVT and equiped my HKS came gears on there or would I be better off just putting the HKS intake gear on and leaving the VVT?

maximajim- how much are the CR 9.1 pistons?, if I can get them with the rings under $700 then I will go with those.

Possibly might go with those mattering on pricing.

They were 850 with wrist pins from Ross. I'm sure you can get a cheaper set from Wiseco.

That's US dollars. So $A1,250 plus freight $150 plus 10% import duty plus 10% GST = $A1,700

Yep, that's about right. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...