Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My Torque Gauge Is Not Working As It Was With The Standard Gtr Wheels Its Constantly On 10?, The Guy I Brought The Wheels Of Said The Same Thing He Reckons Something To Do With Bigger Tres On The Back? Any Truth To This And How To Fix It?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/51139-put-18s-on-and-the-torque-gauge-is/
Share on other sites

Guest Variable

I had the same problem on my 32 GTR a while back. Had some 3 month old 255/40 R17 Federals on the back and replaced the fronts with brand new 255/40 R17 Potenza S03's. The difference in rolling diameter was enough to put my torque gauge permantly on about 8. Put the new Potenzas on the back and everything went back to normal.

There is no law against putting the same size tyres on those rims.

245's will be happy on both those widths. Commodores have 235's on 8" rims

stock BNR34s run 245/40R18 on 9" wide wheels. It is all good dude!

Trivia:... 911 turbos use different diameter front and rear tyres to preload the viscous coupling that transfers torque front to rear.

all four wheel/tyre combos must be the same on a gtr.

No, you can have different widths front and back but the tyres you use have to have the SAME ROLLING Diameter.

So its just a matter of getting the right aspect ratio of the tyres correct.

Its the same if you get a partly flat tyre, the torque gauge tells you something is not right by running quarter way on constantly.

if you have different size tyres on (that arn't exactly the same rolling diam), the ATTESA picks up that one set of wheels (front or back) is spinning faster than the other set, so it gives you some front torque...

everyone i know with a GTR goes for same size wheels/tyres for this reason, plus we can fit them under our gaurds :D

the difference in wheel size may affect it though. cause when you put 245s over 9 inch wheels they will stretch more than on 8 inch. The more stretched, the less upright the sidewalls so the rolling diameter will be less.

or may be less. just a thought. can anyone clarify...

Yes... that is right. It all depends how smart the computer is

If it is 8.5 vs 9.0 inch and he is using 245/40R18's and lets just assume that 8.5" gives you a perfectly straight sidewall you would have a total diameter of 653.2mm So if we stick them on 9" wheels (6.35mm wide each side) and assume (there is that word again) that the sidewalls are 100% stiff and retain their 98mm length then the according to Mr Pythagoras new effective height would be 97.98mm which is probably something I have stuffed up...

So the difference would be 0.04mm on the total diameter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
    • Here's the chart for fuel pressure vs. current draw, assuming your base fuel pressure is 3 bar and you run like 0.5bar boost on WOT, you should only momentarily hit 9amps here and there. (Ignore my prev post, I cannot read a chart these days it seems)
    • Those comp test results are not hideous. Whether they are accurate or not (ie, when that comp tester says 140 psi, is the real pressure120, 140 or 160?) is unknown to us. The state of the battery used to crank it over is unknown, etc etc. Many people around here would say that the absolute values and the spread are perfectly fine to just add boost and keep going. I personally would be happier with a narrower spread than that, but even the diff between 125 and 145 is not terrible. That one cylinder at 125 though, has probably copped some damage relative to the others. You should inspect the valves seeing as you've got it open. Do you know how to measure installed ring gaps? That, and an inspection of the rings themselves, is how you will determine whether they need to be replaced. If you're not good to do these things, take the block and the pistons and rings to a shop that is, and ask them for the go/no-go on them. Do the bores need a hone at all? If so, you might well be justified in getting some different pistons in order to get away from the ring supply problem. Whether you're happy to spend a lot more money right now, on more gear, rather than less money, but an amount that looks stupid given that you will only get a handful of rings in exchange for that money, is for you to decide.
    • also possibly backed up to my filler and shat down it! 🤣
    • Ok so i would love some advice here please, i purchased an R33 a few months back and its had a few mods done to the engine, its an RB25det running a Master ECU, 1200cc injectors, bigger turbo, oil cooler, oil filter relocation kit, Spool H-beam rods, acl/ross pistons. When i removed the motor from the vehicle (as its getting a respray) i thought i would compression test it and these are the following results. Cylinder 1-145psi, Cylinder 2-143psi, Cylinder 3-125psi, Cylinder 4-145psi, Cylinder 5-140psi, Cylinder 6-135psi this test was done with the motor on the ground and powering up the starter motor. I dropped the sump and found broken oil squirters on cylinder 3,5 and 6. I was told my rings are probably worn so i stripped the motor completely to get a new set of rings for it. The trouble is no one has these rings anywhere and they have to be custom made by Ross over in the states and will cost about $600+$200 delivery. My question is how can i tell if my rings are at fault and if they are still ok and is this price ok for a set of rings?
×
×
  • Create New...