Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I also have a aotomatic turbo R33 and was looking at buying a after market ecu like the apexi pfc and been shopping around 4 a good price and doing sum research about them 4 my car and i was speaking to a company on brisbane southside called fist performance and audio and he said u can use the pfc on the auto and it will work but he has to order it from japan if wanted it .

I think he was just trying to sell you a PowerFC - unless of course there is a specifcally reprogrammed "auto" version around?

I have seen Power FC for Toyota autos, but never Nissan autos. I have no doubt the manual Power FC will run the engine, I have driven an auto R33 GTST with a Power FC. The engine runs perfectly, exactly the same as a manual R33 GTST. But the gearchange quality was crap in my opinion. It flared on up changes, swapped between gears under even load and the kick down was eaither lethargic (sometimes) or viscious (most times). All of these symptons are logical in light of the manual Power FC not having the programming logic for ignition retard and cut during gearchanges.

I should point out that the owner was completely happy and was quite willing to sacrifice a "small amount" (his words, not mine) of gearbox niceness for the power he got from the Power FC and its tuning. So until the gearbox eventually fails from this excess loading, it comes down to personal opinion. I don't know that I would want to try and claim warranty on "personal opinion".

Since I want to keep the standard gearbox niceness and life, retaining the standard ECU auto programming logic is a must. Unitil I find a guaranteed replacement ECU that is. :D

  • 6 months later...

its actually on a s13 with sr20det but think it would be similar.

the problem is the fuel pump i think, its not priming when you turn the key on, and not running at all.

even when you directly wire it into 12volts and it runs still is not starting, my friend seems to think the power fc has to "see" the fuel pump.

anyone know the water temp sensor voltage when cold?

its actually on a s13 with sr20det but think it would be similar.

the problem is the fuel pump i think, its not priming when you turn the key on, and not running at all.

even when you directly wire it into 12volts and it runs still is not starting, my friend seems to think the power fc has to "see" the fuel pump.

anyone know the water temp sensor voltage when cold?

What have you done about the Park/Neutral switch from the auto? If you don't switch it on or bridge it out, the car will not start. ;)

ok, a little background info to help you.

the car is a 180sx s13 1991.

it was manual, converted to automatic - working fine with stock ecu for about 1.5 years.

when you plug in the power fc, the car will not start and the fuel pump won't prime or run.

we believe it is because the power fc thinks the water temperature sensor is faulty.

in the menu it shows that the Water temperature sensor has a voltage or 4.88volts when cold.

so i plug in the standard ecu and my consult board, the water temperature sensor is working fine, showing the correct temperature.

ok so now the car is heated up with the water temperature around 60degrees.

we plug back in the power fc and sure enough still 4.88 volts for the water temperature sensor. obvously the power is not even reading it properly.

the power fc shows this voltage as an incorrect voltage, meaning it thinks the sensor is broken, it definately is not.

my guesses:

-power fc is faulty

-power fc is wrong model (there are 3 or 4 models for the s13 alone)

-standard ecu was the wrong one for the model and sensor have been changed to match.

(the sensors were changed in later models)

NOPE looked on fast and websites and it is the right ecu for the car.

also checked the model of the power fc out and it is the correct model.

we are stumped.

also when we plugged in the power fc the first time, even when we pushed the throttle the TPS voltage would not change, the second time it was working fine, which makes me lean towards faulty power fc.

this power fc has been bought new ordered from apexi japan.

More than likely you have either not plugged it in fully...or you need to run thicker gauge wiring to the battery for the 12v source.. anyhow, i'm just regurgitating..

It's all here in the very excellent PowerFC FAQ by paulr33 :)

http://members.dodo.com.au/paul/skylinesau...erfc-faq.htm#18

I just wonder could PFC fits R34 GTT auto? The reason i'm asking is because even i shifting it manually,i felt the gearbox is not shifting/response fast enough in the high RMP.  

Is any GTT auto mates has the same feeling as mine?  

cheers

steven

Hi Steven, no it won't work, not even close. Nissan automatic ECU's have shift logic (eg; they cut ignition on gearchanges to smooth them out and help the gearbox to last longer). This extensive amount of logic is not programmed into Power FC's, I guess Apexi figured they would have to charge too much or they don't want to get into auto gearbox programming.:P

More than likely you have either not plugged it in fully...or you need to run thicker gauge wiring to the battery for the 12v source.. anyhow, i'm just regurgitating..  

It's all here in the very excellent PowerFC FAQ by paulr33 :D

http://members.dodo.com.au/paul/skylinesau...erfc-faq.htm#18

10 points to predator, yep my friend didn't use a socket set each time and it wasn't all the way in on the plugs.

sorry for wasting your time! ;)

Was looking around for an ECU for the auto too. Like Sydneykid I'm not keen on sacrificing long-term durability though. At this stage I'm looking at getting either an e-manage or SAFC, maybe SAFC because it looks easier to tune. Obviously it won't give the performance kick of a full chip replacement but I guess that's just life hey :cheers:

As far as quick shifting goes, there was a member on here called Dragon, who bought an upgrade chip which shortened the lag time between shits, not sure who made it though?

Most of the guys with the autos can run the e-manage with no problems, my one has been serving me fine.

Nissan automatic ECU's have shift logic (eg; they cut ignition on gearchanges to smooth them out and help the gearbox to last longer).  This extensive amount of logic is not programmed into Power FC's, I guess Apexi figured they would have to charge too much or they don't want to get into auto gearbox programming.:cheers:

Just a thought -

the big killer of Autos is heat, and the slower the shift the more heat they produce. (but the smoother the ride for the general public)

The shift kits that are being sold through the group buys section seem to be a hit, and they too give quick shifts, and reportly wont harm the longevity of the auto.

SK, are you comming down to Malalar soon? the offer is still there if you want to try out my auto R33 with the PFC.

SK - where is the Shift Logic kept on Nissan Automatics? Is it on the Main ECU or the second Auto ECU?

I wonder if you were to swap the Main ECU's from an Manual into an Auto from a same model car if it would work?

If the Shift Logic is kept on the Auto ECU i see no reason why it wouldn't work.

If that is the case then the guys doing remaps dont have to worry if the ECU they're working on is from an Auto or a Manual car. Right?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
×
×
  • Create New...