Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Sk, is there going to be much difference if i use an 85mm throttle body? Or am i actualy better off trying bigger like 100mm?? Im not up with this airflow stuff so please inform me? I wont be racing around a circuit, it will be dily driven on street with occasional willowbank day for drags and drift. no circuit racing. does this make the single tb choice alittle better?

Steve, I have "tried it" both with a standard RB25 throttle body and a Foulcan throttle body.  I could fee lthe slowness instantly on the road, and on the track it was disasterous.  With the dog box we have ~50 milliseconds for a downshift and you MUST match the engine rpm with the gearbox rpm.  Otherwise you end up with twisted splines on the input shaft from the triple plate clutch and missing teeth on the gears, particularly 2nd.

It is quite simple to understand why this is the case.  With the multiple throttles there is very little air between the butterflies and the inlet valves.  So when you close the throttle the airflow to the engine stops instantly, therefore so does its power production.  Compare that to a single throttle body with a plenum in between the butterfly and the valves.  The usual rule of thumb is at least double the engine capacity in the plenum, so on a 3.1 litre that's 6.2 litres.  Plus that 6.2 litres is under boost just before you close the throttle, so at 1.5 bar it really has 9.3 litres of air in it.   In addition, after you close the throttle, the plenum goes under vacuum, around 0.25 bar is not unusual, that's another 1.6 litres.

So when you close and reopen the throttle 7.8 litres of air flow dulls the response.  On a 3.1 litre engine that's almost 5 revolutions of the crankshaft, at 7,500 rpm that's 666 milliseconds.  That's more than 10 times slower than the gearbox will handle.  To translate that into distance, at Bathurst it would mean we would be lapped twice during the race distance

Another way to look at it, Nissan designed the GTR to win races on the circuit, if they thought a single TB was better then they would have used it.  Let's face it, a single TB is simpler to make, therefore cheaper, easier to tune and maintain.  But Nissan went for multiple TB's, why?  Because for their stated aim it was superior.

Let me close off with;

Hey Sk, is there going to be much difference if i use an 85mm throttle body? Or am i actualy better off trying bigger like 100mm?? Im not up with this airflow stuff so please inform me? I wont be racing around a circuit, it will be dily driven on street with occasional willowbank day for drags and drift. no circuit racing. does this make the single tb choice alittle better?

An 85 mm butterfly or a 100 mm butterfly, it makes no difference in the example I have given above. It is the volume of air between the butterfly and the inlet valve that matters. Obviously if the turbo can supply more air than will flow though the buttefly, then bigger is better. But I personally have used a standard RB25 TB and inlet up to 450 bhp and it is certainly not a restriction at that power level. I have seen a Zeni Tani built 550 bhp RB25 with the standard TB and inlet and it did not seem to suffer either.

Regardless of whether it is for road or circuit, as most people know, I hate cars with poor throttle response, turbo cars already have too much for me, even at their best. So I see no reason to make it worse and, if everything else is equal, a single TB WILL make it worse. Well up to a power level that I have yet to exceed anyway.

If you are intending to use a MAP sensor driven ECU (not an AFM driven ECU) then go with the single TB, it makes the tuning so much easier. Multiple TB's and MAP sensors are not happy together.

Hope that answered your question. :)

sorry to be off topic but every post i see from sydneykid is of excellent quality and as others said he is teaching everyone something new :D

keep it up

so also with my rb26 with 6 throttles bodies, and autronics be a problem to tune with more power? (currently got 350hp atw, 12.0 @ 118mph)

cheers

Brad

i will be using a power fc with the single tb. Im alittle worried about the difficulty of adapting the gtr plenum to my rb25 head. Seems port design is different. i have no idea.

Power FC runs AFM's so the multiple throttle bodies would be OK. :D

You didn't really think that Nissan would make it easy to put RB26 (flagship) stuff on an RB25, did you? They simply didn't want the value of GTR's being deminished, so they made it as hard as possible. :headspin:

so also with my rb26 with 6 throttles bodies, and autronics be a problem to tune with more power? (currently got 350hp atw, 12.0 @ 118mph)

cheers

Brad

Hi Brad, not a problem for the Autronic, if well tuned of course, they can handle multiple throttle bodies :D

SK? so how hard is it to mount the gtr plenum to a rb25det? (r33 model) what mods would need to be done?

And to add to that, do u know anyone that could mod to fit the rb25 and wat price am i looking at?

SK u have turn me off the greddy plenum and onto the gtr one :D apart from the cost factor, by the sounds it much better :D

SK? so how hard is it to mount the gtr plenum to a rb25det? (r33 model) what mods would need to be done?

And to add to that, do u know anyone that could mod to fit the rb25 and wat price am i looking at?

SK u have turn me off the greddy plenum and onto the gtr one :D apart from the cost factor, by the sounds it much better ;)

Honestly it is cheaper to buy an RB26 top end and sell the RB25 top end, than it is to fabricate the stuff to make it fit an RB25. Plus you get all of the RB26 advantages, solid followers, valve springs, valves, ports, combustion chamber, squish etc etc. And the other parts, cams pulleys, no VVT etc are much cheaper and easier to get second hand for an RB26 than an RB25.

I have done the numbers 20+ times for people, it always works out cheaper in the long run, you get a better result and it's much easier to sell if you ever want to. :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...