Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I've seen some skylines around with what I assume to be "Locked Diffs" they make this skipping noise of the inside wheel while turning tight corners.....

... first of all, is this safe for daily driving ?

Does anyone here recommend a locked diff brand/type ? Are there switchable diffs to lock/unlock them ?

What's wrong with the standard LSD that comes with Skylines ? Or was it an option?

And what exactly is an active LSD ?

Are you able to lock a standard skyline diff ?

I have Active LSD on my R33 SII GTS-25T and this is what I know about it and it aint much.

The Active-LSD uses a computer to sense wheel slipage and diverts power to the aposing wheel rather than by mechanical methods, the main difference is the speed that is can tranfer power from wheel to wheel. 1/50 sec. It uses a similar system to the 4WD system on the GTR but only transfers power from side to side.

I've got a mechanical in mine and your right, they are a bit noisey around tight slow corners. But apparently they give you the best grip for a (two wheel drive) rwd car.

Straight line drags are great, corners are a bit strange at first, but once you realise that they are very pradictable your OK.

They really aren't as bad as everyone says they are in the wet either.

J

Originally posted by tlai909

Do all Skyline r33 models have the basic mechanical LSD?

T.

All turbo R33's have LSD as standard. But mechanical locking LSD's are an after market thing.

Some loucky people got the Active LSD's, they are again different to normal LSD and mechanical locking LSD's.

Sooooooo many diff's.........

J

  • 6 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I'm looking at getting a manual r33 sedan still deciding on turbo or not.

so does that mean a turbo sedan will have a viscous LSD and a non turbo wont have LSD?

can someone clear it up for me please.

Yeah, standard diff is viscous.

Viscous diff uses property of the oil to limit slip - as slip occurs it get stickier. quickly.

The active diffs use sensors on the wheels, and electronically controlled clutches to control torque - just like the front to rear split in atessa.

with the mechanical... so it locks under power ?

That sounds good... The wet wouldn't bother me as my car is nasty as it is so i take it easy.

But it can be a little unpredicatble at times, so J, if as you said it makes it more predictable ?? Then i would want that.

And that's good for drifiting isn't it ? That's what i'm aiming for over the next 2-3 years as a project!

R31 - yepp, you've hit the nail on the head. From my limited experience (cause I drive like a granpa most the time!), when the back comes around it's very predictable.

From what I've read, the mechanicals are great for drags and trackwork, and even better for drift. They can be a bit noisey for street driving. Some days it pi$$es me off, but other days I think 'damn I love this diff !!'

Like last night overtaking someone doing 70 in a 80 zone... Raining... I drop it back to 3rd and give it 1/2 throttle. It starts spinning the wheels but it still holds a dead straight line.... Unless you flick the wheel a bit of course :)

Meg's - does your's clunk (inside wheel skip) around tight corners when you give it a bit of throttle?

GaryD - Mechanicals only lock up when the throttle is pressed, so they are sort of open wheeler diffs until you give it some go.

The reason why they are good for track work is cause instead of pulling hard out of corner from just before the apex and spinning the inside wheel (typical for even LSD diffs) they will power around with both wheels with a bit of oversteer.

But the oversteer isn't massive and is very easily controlled. Infact most, if not all V8 supercars use either locked or mechanical lockers of some sort.

I was up at Wakefield last friday watching the Brute Utes have a pratice, and as they were coming into the workshop area all of them were skipping the inside wheel while turning tight and slow....

J

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Consider a 35 too...
    • He's right ~ there is no 'magic' with stuff like this ... it is more likely that in the process of looking for the short, the loom/wire 'incidentally' got moved in the process, thus removing the short ~ now, that maybe a wire (in a loom) rubbing against the edge of some grounded metal, that's worn through the insulation, causing the (now intermittent) short to ground. If one wire in a loom has been damaged in this fashion, it's reasonable to presume that other wires beside it may have also be damaged, and now exposed...you can bet the green crusty copper corrosion will start... ...that'd be a pisser, Murphy's Law steps right in as GTS observes...but worse, something like that is easier to find when shorted...ie; unplug bulb and fuse, and put multimeter in continuity mode so you get constant beep, and carefully poke about hoping to find if some movemet of the harness stop the beeping.... ...it's still all a bit Arnie tho' ..It'll be back... 😃
    • Yeah, but knowledge of one wire's insulation worn through to short on earth implies the possibility of other wires doing the same. I had my power steering die, because the wire that runs to the solenoid valve on the rack runs in the same loom as the power wire for the O2 sensor. And when the O2 sensor/wire did something stupid and burnt part of that loom to death, the only indication was the shit(ter) fuel economy and the heavy steering. It took deep excavation of the looms in the bay to find the problem. Not wear through in that case, but similar shit.
    • Ah, I thought he'd wired it to one of the spare ECU inputs! Too long ago since I read that post, ha ha. I've been arguing with radiators, harmonic balancers, alternators and rust since reading it.
    • Correct. The ECU cannot read oil temp. (Well, I think it probably can in some situations. I did have the thought of potentially repinning the ECU when I was doing oil pressure). I am using this into the MPVI dongle, so that the MPVI dongle can read oil temperature. It is attached to a VDO gauge which is obviously calibrated to whatever curve the sender actually is using. This would be easy if I could setup a table of voltage to temperature like many sensors, but it appears I cannot do this and can only setup the transform rule which appears to be Input (voltage) x Multiplier, and add an offset. This to me means it MUST be linear. So it may be a complete waste of time wiring this into the ECU. The idea was that the MPVI3 has standalone logging. I wanted to use this instead of a laptop with serial cable (for wideband) for long datalogs. Given the wideband also has electric interference, I may never trust this either in a world where the serial wideband and the analog output wideband do not agree. Last time I did a trace I could see the two wideband traces follow each other, but one was a little leaner than the other. I plan on playing with voltage offsets and actually driving the thing to see how close they correlate. If they never correlate... then, well, maybe I'll never use either. Ideally I'd like to have the Analog wideband read ever so slightly leaner than the serial one, because the serial one is 'correct'. Tuning the car to be ever so slightly too-rich would be the aim. Not needing to have a laptop flying around in the footwell connected with cables is... an advantage. About the only one from the forced upgrade to MPVI3.
×
×
  • Create New...