Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I've seen some skylines around with what I assume to be "Locked Diffs" they make this skipping noise of the inside wheel while turning tight corners.....

... first of all, is this safe for daily driving ?

Does anyone here recommend a locked diff brand/type ? Are there switchable diffs to lock/unlock them ?

What's wrong with the standard LSD that comes with Skylines ? Or was it an option?

And what exactly is an active LSD ?

Are you able to lock a standard skyline diff ?

I have Active LSD on my R33 SII GTS-25T and this is what I know about it and it aint much.

The Active-LSD uses a computer to sense wheel slipage and diverts power to the aposing wheel rather than by mechanical methods, the main difference is the speed that is can tranfer power from wheel to wheel. 1/50 sec. It uses a similar system to the 4WD system on the GTR but only transfers power from side to side.

I've got a mechanical in mine and your right, they are a bit noisey around tight slow corners. But apparently they give you the best grip for a (two wheel drive) rwd car.

Straight line drags are great, corners are a bit strange at first, but once you realise that they are very pradictable your OK.

They really aren't as bad as everyone says they are in the wet either.

J

Originally posted by tlai909

Do all Skyline r33 models have the basic mechanical LSD?

T.

All turbo R33's have LSD as standard. But mechanical locking LSD's are an after market thing.

Some loucky people got the Active LSD's, they are again different to normal LSD and mechanical locking LSD's.

Sooooooo many diff's.........

J

  • 6 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I'm looking at getting a manual r33 sedan still deciding on turbo or not.

so does that mean a turbo sedan will have a viscous LSD and a non turbo wont have LSD?

can someone clear it up for me please.

Yeah, standard diff is viscous.

Viscous diff uses property of the oil to limit slip - as slip occurs it get stickier. quickly.

The active diffs use sensors on the wheels, and electronically controlled clutches to control torque - just like the front to rear split in atessa.

with the mechanical... so it locks under power ?

That sounds good... The wet wouldn't bother me as my car is nasty as it is so i take it easy.

But it can be a little unpredicatble at times, so J, if as you said it makes it more predictable ?? Then i would want that.

And that's good for drifiting isn't it ? That's what i'm aiming for over the next 2-3 years as a project!

R31 - yepp, you've hit the nail on the head. From my limited experience (cause I drive like a granpa most the time!), when the back comes around it's very predictable.

From what I've read, the mechanicals are great for drags and trackwork, and even better for drift. They can be a bit noisey for street driving. Some days it pi$$es me off, but other days I think 'damn I love this diff !!'

Like last night overtaking someone doing 70 in a 80 zone... Raining... I drop it back to 3rd and give it 1/2 throttle. It starts spinning the wheels but it still holds a dead straight line.... Unless you flick the wheel a bit of course :)

Meg's - does your's clunk (inside wheel skip) around tight corners when you give it a bit of throttle?

GaryD - Mechanicals only lock up when the throttle is pressed, so they are sort of open wheeler diffs until you give it some go.

The reason why they are good for track work is cause instead of pulling hard out of corner from just before the apex and spinning the inside wheel (typical for even LSD diffs) they will power around with both wheels with a bit of oversteer.

But the oversteer isn't massive and is very easily controlled. Infact most, if not all V8 supercars use either locked or mechanical lockers of some sort.

I was up at Wakefield last friday watching the Brute Utes have a pratice, and as they were coming into the workshop area all of them were skipping the inside wheel while turning tight and slow....

J

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...