Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

with the BC kit i've noticed there are 2 types

- BR type RS series....................... more expensive

- V1 design VS series................... less expensive

whats the better one to get???

BR's are what I have, very happy with them. Iain has the same.

Not sure if one is "better" than the other; I'd be willing to bet the damper cartridge is the same, just prettier collars on the BR's.

Edited by Daleo

what pic?

the ones on the justjap site dont look anything like the M35 ones. for a start, the rear of our car isnt a 'coil-over' type setup

yeh i just realised that again.

but if you compare them with the VS models the tops are different, so a wrong assumption by me.

looks like im just gonna get the VS's...

You don't try hard enough Iain! :nyaanyaa:

n00b question, but are there adjustable wishbones available?

Yes, but I doubt you'll need them. Camber is pretty good when you lower. I'd use offset bushes in the std arms, that way you still keep your ride quality.

Hey guys, Just into the coilover swap now.......S1 1997 RS4.

Couple of small questions, What's the difference between 34GTST and 33GTR front coilovers?

I know the spring rates are different as mentioned in this thread, but are the physical dimensions similiar?

And will a standard Stagea rear strut hat fit an a/m S14 rear coilover?

Thanks + Cheers :)

well 34 GTT (or 33GTST?) are rear wheel drive so id say different to your RS4 stagea. R33GTR physically fit. the s14 would physically fit an auto RS4 but top hats/mounts will need to be modified due to being too wide IMO. dampeners will be adjustable so you might get past the different valving in the shocks

if your buying coilovers why not just buy stagea specific coilovers?

Hey after searching and searching this thread and others, I'm still trying to find a definite coilover setup that will fit my rs4s I was looking at bc coilovers but I'm not sure now which ones I'll need Im pretty sure r33 gtr will go straight in but the valving is wrong will this make a huge difference if both the spring rate and damping is increased

Is your RS4 manual? AFAIK the manual's have the same shock bottom on the rear as a GTR (Fork-type), whereas Autos have GTST type shock mount (eyelet-type). My understanding of this thread is that R33 GTR front will be fine, but both R33 rears have wrong valving. Justjap list them specific for a Stagea with both Eyelet and Fork type rears.

Pretty easy to tell what you need if you poke your head under the back of the car and take a look at the bottom of the shock.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...