Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

MY MUM SPOTTED CYRUS near the highway at burpengary. and i quote -

"he had a wife and kid/s... had dark hair. car was gunmetal grey, a manual, and a loud exhaust'

lol figure thats gotta be you, man.

Edited by qikstagea

Proxy spotted: An ACT SAU member spotted Marc's white S2 trying to make it with an Echo yesterday morning. He's ok but the car is a mess, no info on write-off or not, i'll let him tell the story.

Spotted 3 Stageas in the space of 10 minutes - getting common now !!!

One is a white Series 1 near Baby on a Budget in Joondalup - owned by the manager there.

Then as we drove from there, saw a green Series 1 heading West along Ocean Reef Rd near Woodvale, then an awesome white Series 1 with a great body kit stopped at the lights turning right from Wanneroo Rd into Ocean Reef Rd - this was all around 2:00pm today

Spotted a Silver S2 Stagea, on copland dr around 10 to 6, turned left at the college, I was in the blue r32 4 door, don't know if you saw me , i was behind the 4x4, still nice looking stagea.

Was probably me, i live up the road there. mine is a S1 sorry to disappoint, but i have S2 taillights & Autech wing :ninja:

Spotted yellow Stagea going through the lights at Joondalup Dve and Ocean Reef Rd (just in time before the red light) - was in mine and gave a wave but probably didn't get seen (or just ignored !!!)

Cheers, Al

Spotted STG.34R in east maitland, silver stag the same as mine had S2 tail lights, can't be sure these days s1 or s2 , but is was RS4 had a big cannon n HKS sticker, it was raining too the 4wd would've had me, not sure if he seen me tho

Spotted a Silver S2 in east maitland today while going into greenhills.

That's right, i'm in Maitland for a couple of days, keep an eye out ;)

call into hassall grove on ya way home just jump off m7 at richmond rd and ya there at mikes house lol or gimme a ring pm me for my number if you get time :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...