Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was wondering does anyone know of the most powerfull RB25DET in Australia or even some very powerfull ones in japan etc, Has to still be 2.5 L doesnt matter what engine mods internal bolt ons, just after some recorded figures maybe dyno sheets or info from mags, just lookin to see who owns the record, thanks heaps for the help

Keep on boostin :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54068-most-powerfull-rb25det/
Share on other sites

Theirs lots of potential out their.

Just a couple off the top of my head,

OBHVE R33 - 386rwkw's 518hp

JMS R33 - 448rwkw's 601hp

Twin turbo RB25 Silvia - 355kw's

A fair few guys on here have 300kw + GTS-T With RB25's in them some with aftermarket internals some with standard internals.

Im sure theirs more powerful RB25 engines than above that havn't been seen to the public. :) It also comes down to $$$ aswel :)

But at the end of the day horsepower figures will only tell the truth on the 1/4 mile.

:)

Jun

From the thread:

MOD LIST:

- NEO RB25 (year 98+)

-Greddy intake plenum

-75mm mustang throttle (to be upgraded by a 83mm infiniti one)

-Greddy Type R S14 intercooler with 3in. piping

-custom exhaust header (ceramic coated)

-Presicion Turbo T-67 (front polished, rear ceramic coated)

front: .70ar with a 66 turbine

Rear: .69ar with a P trim turbine

-Turbonetics racegate

-HKS blow-off valve

-850cc injectors

-aeromotive fuel press. regulator

- Walboro 255 in-tank fuel pump

- Fuel canister (to maintain fuel volumen)

-Bosch porsche fuel pump ( after the canister)

-custom fuel rail

-Rb25 stock tranny

-exedy dual disk cluth

-nismo differential

-3in down pipe and 3in exhaust (no cat.)

-Microtech fuel injection computerEngine is totaly stock internals, for the exeption now of a power enterprise head gasket and ARP head studs.

587HP @ 26psi

I need more convincing that what is in that thread :)

Having said that and a bit of research on this Turbo

(look here: http://www.precisionturbo.net/turbocharger...ategory_id=3027)

The Presision T-67 is rated at 780HP

Thats one big F'off turbo.

That'd be one laggy ho

the jms R33 448rwkw was a dyno failure, the car actually did around 380rwkw with racing juice and low 300rwkw with pump. I saw it got tune again and run after 1,2 weeks after the autosalon.

yeah, always have to be careful of dyno figures, especially from "workshop" cars funnily enough.

anywhere from 250-300rwkw is fairly "standard" these days... quite a few getting around australia with these figures.. .could probably name about 10 on here with those figures alone :)

The question is - what fails first? and what are the inherent weaknesses when pushing past 300rwkw ?

i got 420rwhp of an rb25 using a gt35 with pistons as only internal upgrade, as for bolt on the list starts here and goes to over ---------------> there, but it did lasted for a fairwhile until i drove a true 800+ hp rb26 monster.

This isn't meant to sound provocative, but I am tired so I apologise in advance if it does sound that way.

near anything an RB26 can do an RB25 can also.

Is that really saying much though? Throw enough money at most half-decent engines are you can extract significant power.

How does it break down in terms of bang-for-buck (ignoring initial purchase price)? Surely the RB26 starts with an advantage?

LW.

ive got a mate with a neo6 in a 180, its currently making 290rwkw detuned. if he ever gets it finished ill post the end figure up. yet to come is bigger fuel lines (still using stock s13) bigger throttle body and cams. no point in posting what is expected so ill wait till it makes the power befor saying anything else.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I hadn't thought about the variable power steering assist. Presumably, it will always be the same level of assist as you get in an S14. The R32/3/4 are either helliishly heavy (at low speeds) if the solenoid is not powered at all, or hellishly too light (at high speed) if it is powered all the time. I presume that it is PWM controlled on those cars. I hadn't thought about the S cars not having variable assist. ugh. What crappy plebby cars they must be!  
    • Hmm yeah that is a good point. It looks like it'll just bolt in with no real issue besides maybe the bushings being different. My other concern was that 2 pin plug that I assume is used in some way to control the rack solenoid depending on the speed signal from the ecu. The DMAX rack doesn't even have that plug though so, don't think it'll matter. Might just order the rack and see how it goes. Will update this when I figure something out
    • I'd say it's a fair bet that the feed and return fluid lines will be in different enough spots that you would need to come up with a way to cut the originals short and adapt with new hard line adaption or braided teflon hoses or somesuch. But really, you have the car, you have the photos of the DMAX rack - you should be able to go out there and see for yourself whether they're in the same or different spots.
    • I've been doing some looking around and honestly was just considering throwing a new rack at it. I saw that the dmax silvia rack bolts up into the 33 with the silvia bushings but not sure if the high pressure lines will sit in the correct spot. I believe other version of the 33 rack are the same/similar to the racks that can be opened up without as much fuss so I assume the dmax rack would fit but any ideas?
    • I've never played with one, but I would expect that you are correct. That slot looks like it is intended to be used to unscrew the end, and the flats on the body would be better than grabbing it around the round bit with a pipe wrench. So, yeah, probably unscrews. You'll probably have to make a tool to drive in that slot.
×
×
  • Create New...