Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am going to get my ECU rechipped again and i need a little help to make sure i am not going to run 100% duty cycle.

I am running a set of denso 270cc injectors(stk rb20) they have been rebuilt i will be installing them like:

cyl1-270

cyl2-270

cyl3-272

cyl4-272

cyl5-276

cly6-276

keeping cyl 5 and 6 richer for safety.

car and engine specs are

rb20det 100.000ks

rb25 hi flowed and has produced 226rwkw @ 1bar on rb22 hybrid engine

walbro 255lt fuel pump

turbo back 3" with almost no bends and the biggest hi flo cat possible

GTR sized FMIC with waterspray kit on 5psi hobbs switch

oil catch can

EBC single stage

standard AFM

the car will be tuned with a professional wide band air/fuel meter that logs data. and cross referenced on the dyno. it will be tuned for 98ron.

what is the safest/best performance a/f ratio?

how many rwkw can i expect while keeping a safe duty cycle?

what is the theoretical hp per injector rating?

I want to do this properly and do not want a dodgy half assed tune that will lean out and go bang!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54251-injector-flow-calculation/
Share on other sites

In a 6 cylinder, 270 cc's = 270 bhp

Divided by 1.34 to get KW= 202 kw

Take away 50 kw for losses = 152 rwkw

Around 12 on the A/F ratio

That's about it.:/

ok now i am scared... my last dyno produced 215rwhp with current tune.

but since then i have added

FMIC

dump pipe

hi flowed turbo

and my a/f is around 12.

does this mean i am already running 100%?

I was under the impression i could get close to 200rwkw from these injectors going from a lot of the posts on the internet and these forums,

however i take your opinion as i know you have experience...

so no point having my ECU tuned again?

You can get a bit of leeway on the duty cycle by increasing the fuel pressure behind the injector, up to around 4 bar (58psi). Use something like a Malpasssi adjustable FPR to achieve this.

The flow , therefore hp, will be modified by SQRT(New Pressure / Current Pressure)

how come there are so many rb20s doing this with stock injectors, are they all going to go bang?

"quote"

I made 200rwkw (268rwhp) with the stock injectors and 0.9bar boost, so talking to Shaun at Boostworx, who will be tuning it, he reckons around 18psi or there abouts should see if make some really good power, and there is no reason why is shouldn't be able to run this boost, as the RB20 has lowish comp. ratio and it has a nice fuel setup now, so all the key factors are there to produce good power

"end quote"

how come there are so many rb20s doing this with stock injectors, are they all going to go bang?

"quote"

I made 200rwkw (268rwhp) with the stock injectors and 0.9bar boost, so talking to Shaun at Boostworx, who will be tuning it, he reckons around 18psi or there abouts should see if make some really good power, and there is no reason why is shouldn't be able to run this boost, as the RB20 has lowish comp. ratio and it has a nice fuel setup now, so all the key factors are there to produce good power

"end quote"

No Problem with the 18psi, RB20DET will handle that easily as long as the tuning is good, of course.

I have yet to see an RB20DET make 200 rwkw on standard injectors. I have a Nismo adjustable fuel pressure regulator and a GTR pump on ours and the best I could get out of the standard injectors was 180 rwkw and it was at 100% duty cycle over 7,000 rpm. It has a set of S5RX7T 550cc's in it now and it has more than enough fuel for 225 rwkw.

RB25DET's have 340 cc injectors and they run out of flow at ~210 rwkw. Some people think RB20's can do the same, but forget that you have to rev them higher to make the same power so there is less time for the injectors to be open.

The most common upgrade for RB20's are the 444 cc GTR injectors, with the GTR resistor pack to match the impedance, they are a good choice at realtively low cost as there are many around.

:/

Hijacking thread but still on injectors...

Sydneykid - had my RB25DET dyno'd yesterday and was hitting 96% injector duty, perfect 12:1 AFR's at almost 12psi for a total of 295rwhp. Does this seem right given i'm on stock injectors, 45psi base fuel pressure (when no boost line to reg connected). How do these people get 400rwhp out of stock injectors? I've got 450HP fuel pump so i'm somewhat confused.

The rest of my setup should be good for around 350rwhp but it seems I can't get past my injector duties. 12psi on an HKS turbo is relatively low so i'm hoping to wind some more boost in but don't want to at the expense of my engine!

Sydneykid - had my RB25DET dyno'd yesterday and was hitting 96% injector duty, perfect 12:1 AFR's at almost 12psi for a total of 295rwhp. Does this seem right given i'm on stock injectors, 45psi base fuel pressure (when no boost line to reg connected). How do these people get 400rwhp out of stock injectors? I've got 450HP fuel pump so i'm somewhat confused.

You and me both, I have no idea. I certainly can't get there, but I am not a very good tuner.:(

All this talk about rwkw injector limits has got me interested why my RB20DET was running in to the 10's on 1bar and making ~150rwkw with only a bosch fuel pump?!?!

Leaning the car out to high 11's ended up making 164rwkw.

My injectors are different to any other RB20DET I have seen.

They are a clear top with a red dot on them & silver body.

The ECU doesn't appear to be chipped (that I can tell), I was thinking maybe they were CA18DET's as that is what they look like.

All this talk about rwkw injector limits has got me interested why my RB20DET was running in to the 10's on 1bar and making ~150rwkw with only a bosch fuel pump?!?!

 

Leaning the car out to high 11's ended up making 164rwkw.

 

My injectors are different to any other RB20DET I have seen.

They are a clear top with a red dot on them & silver body.

 

The ECU doesn't appear to be chipped (that I can tell), I was thinking maybe they were CA18DET's as that is what they look like.

CA18DET Injectors are 340 cc's so it would be virtually impossible for the engine to run well on them without some form of tuning.:P

No Problem with the 18psi, RB20DET will handle that easily as long as the tuning is good, of course.

I have yet to see an RB20DET make 200 rwkw on standard injectors.  I have a Nismo adjustable fuel pressure regulator and a GTR pump on ours and the best I could get out of the standard injectors was 180 rwkw and it was at 100% duty cycle over 7,000 rpm.  It has a set of S5RX7T 550cc's in it now and it has more than enough fuel for 225 rwkw.

RB25DET's have 340 cc injectors and they run out of flow at ~210 rwkw.  Some people think RB20's can do the same, but forget that you have to rev them higher to make the same power so there is less time for the injectors to be open.

The most common upgrade for RB20's are the 444 cc GTR injectors, with the GTR resistor pack to match the impedance, they are a good choice at realtively low cost as there are many around.

:)

Mine has made 200rwkw (197,200,200 on three seperate dyno's) on standard injectors. I must admit though, the tune was quite lean. It has got a Bosch 040 in tank pump, and no form of fuel pressure adjustment apart from what the pump delivers. Dunno how, as your calculations seem to point to them being un-able to make that sort of power?

P.S -thats my qoute about the 18psi :(

Chris

Chris do your 32 injectors look like mine?

Nah, not really Joel, mine are a really deep yellow

Chances are yours are stock injectors, and maybe in your cars past life it has had the bonnet of for a extended period out in the sun, as red plastic fades quite fast when exposed to alot of UV, it will go almost white quite quick :D

Faliing that I have 12 spare RB20 injectors, more than welcome to take one if you want to have a go at testing the flow between the 2?

P.S - have you done your R33 brake upgrade yet? I posted a message on your DIY thread, as I want to do the same, but I am unsure if I need to change anything other than the calipers and rotors?

:) Chris

No... Brakes are not done yet.

I've only recently got the rb30 finished.. :D

In the pic it makes the injectors look yellowish but really they are a clear top with a red painted dot on them. But yer they would be stockers. I find it interesting as I have never seen injectors of the same colour in a RB20DET before.

No... Brakes are not done yet.

I've only recently got the rb30 finished.. :D

 

In the pic it makes the injectors look yellowish but really they are a clear top with a red painted dot on them. But yer they would be stockers. I find it interesting as I have never seen injectors of the same colour in a RB20DET before.

Hmm, it could be they simply ran out if red plastic and cast them with clear and put a red dot on them so the people building the engines could work it out??

One of lifes little mysteries :)

Chris

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...