Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 196
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Steve-SST,

I have an RB25 with ARIAS pistons, Linished, Shot Peened and Cryo Tempered Rods, HKS GT 3040, HKS topmount manifold, PFC, Tomei Poncams 256/9, 550cc Sards, Greddy/Trust Plenum, Ported Head Iski valves prings, Micks MC bar & plate cooler 100mm, E-Boost and Trust Type R W/G 45mm, Q45 Throttle Body, Q45 AFM, 90mm Fujitsubo Exhaust, 90mm dump & very hi flow cat.

Max I could get out of it was 330rwkw @ 21 PSI. (DD Dyno in shootout mode - do a search and you will find the dyno graph I posted)

Since my car is very similar spec to Pauls and Magics -

If I change from PFC to Wolf - am I gonna get 50 rwkw increase ???

Cheers !

/edit = PS I run 118 mph (18PSI) - but I am CRAP at drag racing :(

The post stands it did make 511 on Speedworks dyno and as Tristan said read the following posts and you will find out what it made in shootout.

Speedworks claim their dyno is the only one thats right i think our dyno is but you guys make up your own mind.

Hi Steve-SST,

 

I have an RB25 with ARIAS pistons, Linished, Shot Peened and Cryo Tempered Rods, HKS GT 3040, HKS topmount manifold, PFC, Tomei Poncams 256/9, 550cc Sards, Greddy/Trust Plenum, Ported Head Iski valves prings, Micks MC bar & plate cooler 100mm, E-Boost and Trust Type R W/G 45mm, Q45 Throttle Body, Q45 AFM, 90mm Fujitsubo Exhaust, 90mm dump & very hi flow cat.

 

Max I could get out of it was 330rwkw @ 21 PSI. (DD Dyno in shootout mode - do a search and you will find the dyno graph I posted)

 

 Since my car is very similar spec to Pauls and Magics -  

 

 If I change from PFC to Wolf - am I gonna get 50 rwkw increase ???

 

 Cheers !

 

/edit  = PS I run 118 mph (18PSI) - but I am CRAP at drag racing :(

 

 

3040 rated at 500 at 1bar, cant see why a wolf and the right tuning it would not get 440rwhp. a bigger fuel pump might be needed along with a better head gasket

Just wondering, if injectors are run at or very close to 100% duty cycle, are the spray patterns adversly affected?? Also, I noted that BOOSTD mentioned that increasing the fuel pressure by higher than 10% screwed the spray patterns, but I dont see how this is appliciable if the standard reg would be boosting the rail pressure during boost situations anyway??

3040 rated at 500 at 1bar, cant see why a wolf and the right tuning it would not get 440rwhp. a bigger fuel pump might be needed along with a better head gasket

330kw = 442.5372hp!

Dunno how many times I have said this....

3040 rated at 500 at 1bar, cant see why a wolf and the right tuning it would not get 440rwhp. a bigger fuel pump might be needed along with a better head gasket
Forgot to add - HKS 1.6mm head gasket and Bosche 040 pump.

I want the 380rwkw you guys keep talking about with Garrett GT30s - ha ha

The only real difference is the Wolf - and I can't see how it can be done !

But hey - that's just my opinion

:)

Time a Mod locked this thread and wait for the Drag slip but then there will be hidden NOS storys etc.

Get real will ya !!!

You and your chronies get great pleasure in trying to make yourselves look ahead of everyone else.

You are the one started this thread with a claim of 511rwhp knowing that it was a false reading, inviting everyone to scrutinize the result.

It turns out that the result is nothing out of ordinary and is replicated everywhere else, with the exception of difference in injector sizes. Big farken deal, next time you are in VIC, let me present you with a plaque carved out of an off-cut 0.5mm steel. If you try my earlier suggestion of cam gear modification i will upsize it to 1mm.

To finalise, why is there a 40 degree difference between the intake and ambient temperatures...? It was explained to me by a DD rep that, 40 deg. difference would add an 8% to the reading.

In short, move along fellas...

Emre, STFU, from the being steve and magic1 said that the reading will most likly be out as SPEEDWORKS (the dyno in which was uses @ PAS) reads higher.

WHY DOESNT EVERYONE get over themselfs? I ****ing sick and tied of people bitching just becuase YOU AND YOUR TUNER CANT make the power steve and sst can.

like steve said someone lock this thread, its got out of controll its kind of like a FLAME war between everyone not in W.A and the boys in WA,

You have absolutely no idea about anything, so i susgest you STFU.

Its got nothing to do with wa versus other states, its the inability for ppl to answer questions.

Tristans car will do the times, just give the guy a break. he didnt start this thread btw.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...