Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Can't say as I've seen 130 RON, the unusual ones are;

AVSP11, that's 107 RON but mostly used in racing bikes (2 and 4 stroke).

AVGAS 2T, it's 120 RON, only used in 2 stroke racing, bikes, snowmobiles, water bikes, jet skis and outboards

AtmoBoost is 106 RON and leaded, but not oxygenated. Good for high rpm N/A engines that need lead.

So I think it must be TurboBoost at 115 RON, which was around $7 a litre last time I bought it. But it has been my experience that TurboMax makes better horsepower higher in the RPM range.

:D

Hi Adrian, I have not tried MS103 but looking at the data sheet it looks much like Elf LMS which I have used with much success. Oxygen content is good at 2.55%, it's a bit light at 0.744, so I don't think you could lean it out as much as LMS. The RON at 107 and MON at 99 indicate some serious ignition advance may be possible. The ECU would definitely need retuning to get the best out of it, you couldn't just stick it in the tank and expect to gain something.

Hope that helps:cheers:

The ECU would definitely need retuning to get the best out of it, you couldn't just stick it in the tank and expect to gain something.

My name's not wreckedhead....come on :)

When I run on PULP, I take 4 degrees out across the whole map using the power fc's ignition trim function in the settings menu. This resets when I turn the car off. I am looking to avoid having to do that and save some valuable horsepower in the process.

What is the relevance of the "Motor Octane" everyone seems to quote? I am led to believe that PULP with a quoted octane level of 98 (optimax etc) has a motor octane of 89???

Thanks all.

Adrian

When I try decent fuel, I just add extra ignition to the whole map, it takes 5 seconds.

It has been my experiecne that with an oxygenated fuel, particularly one with a high specific gravity, I also need to take some fuel out of it as well. It is the weight of the fuel that matters, not the volume. The ecu operates by varying the volume, so to allow for the extra weight I have take out some volume to get back to the correct weight.

Hope that makes sense:cheers:

That makes sense. As I see it, this fuel will allow me to keep the timing into the tune whilst also providing a buffer against detonation.

That being said, I think I'll run it at the Nationals at the end of this month and see how I go. I have four passes to get it right before it gets serious. ;)

Will post results and if I get time (doubtful) dyno comparisons on Optimax vs. 103.

Adrian

Guys dont get confused.

Some quick shiftin thru the net strongly suggests that MON is a better indication than RON of a fuel's resistance to detonation. Quick quote;

"The MON is a measure of the gasoline's ability to resist knock under sever operating conditions. MON affects high speed, part throttle and performance (under load such as in passing). The RON on the other hand, is a measure of gasoline's ability to resist knock under less severe conditions. RON affects low to medium speed knock and engine run-on (dieseling). "

VP's Motorsport 103 is some nice stuff. With a MON of 99, thats well over 10 units increase over say, Shell Optimax which is rated at 87.5. Motorsports RON is 107 by doing a lil math. Thats some serious fuel. VPs C16's MON is 117, and thats a whole new ball game again....

Got some stats of the ET 102 bowser fuel:

RON: 102

MON: 90

Density: .778

Oxygen: 2.7%

Going by those stats, I guess it is slightly above Elf LMS but down on oxygen content on the TurboMax. What's the price on LMS?

So the MON (or: MoreimportantOctaneNthat) is:

Optimax: 87.5

Doughboy Super-Fuel: 90

VP 103: 99

That sorta says to me that the VP really is worth nearly double the price as it offers more than four times the MON increase.

Thanks guys. Anyone else wanna add?

Adrian

So the MON (or: MoreimportantOctaneNthat) is:

Optimax: 87.5

Doughboy Super-Fuel: 90

VP 103: 99

That sorta says to me that the VP really is worth nearly double the price as it offers more than four times the MON increase.

Thanks guys.  Anyone else wanna add?

Adrian

Hi Adrian, the problems I see with 103 is it is bit light at 0.744 which is 5% less than TuboMax and its oxygen content is way down (over 40%). The high RON/MON is not the only factor I would consider. I would say from the specs that 103 is designed for very high boost levels (2.5 bar +) on engines with big injectors, hence the high RON/MON and low density. TurboMax because of its much higher oxygen content, would work better in engines at lower boost levels (say 1.5 bar +). Due to its density level, it would definitely work better in engines with marginal injector sizing.

Horses for courses:cheers:

TurboMax because of its much higher oxygen content, would work better in engines at lower boost levels (say 1.5 bar +). Due to its density level, it would definitely work better in engines with marginal injector sizing.

When you talk about higher boost, are you referring to a higher measure of total manifold pressure or higher cylinder pressures? I am only running 1.0 bar and standard Nissan injectors but the cylinder pressures experienced with the nitrous are far greater than a similarly powerful non-nitrous motor. If the higher oxygen content in Elf fuels will be advantageous, which one should I use that is unleaded and doesn't cost $100000/litre?

Adrian

When I try decent fuel, I just add extra ignition to the whole map, it takes 5 seconds.

How much ignition...i ask because i want to start running crappy std unleaded instead of BP Ultimate/Optimax etc. Wondering how much ignition i should take out to allow for the lesser grade fuel?

How much ignition...i ask because i want to start running crappy std unleaded instead of BP Ultimate/Optimax etc.  Wondering how much ignition i should take out to allow for the lesser grade fuel?

And y would you do that roy? You dont want your car sitting in a workshop again for a few months do ya?? :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I got back to Japan in January and was keen to get back on track as quickly as possible. Europe is god-awful for track accessibility (by comparison), so I picked up a first-gen GT86 in December just to have something I could jump into right away. The Skyline came over in a container this time and landed in early January. It was a bit battered after Europe, though—I refused to do anything beyond essential upkeep while it was over there. The clutch master cylinder gave out, and so did the power steering. I didn’t even bother changing the oil; it was the same stuff that went in just before I left Japan the first time. Naughty. Power steering parts would’ve cost double with shipping and taxes, so knowing I’d be heading back to Japan, I just postponed it and powered through the arm workout. It took a solid three months to get the car back on the road. Registration was a nightmare this time around. There were a bunch of BS fees to navigate, and sourcing parts was a headache. I needed stock seats for shaken, mistakenly blew 34k JPY on some ENR34 seats—which, of course, didn’t fit—then ended up having the car’s technical sheet amended to register it as a two-seater with the Brides. Then there’s the GT86. Amazing car. Does everything I want it to do. Parts are cheap, easy to find, and I don’t care what anyone says—it’s super rewarding to drive. I’ve done a few basic mods: diff ratio, coilovers, discs, pads, seat, etc. It already had a new exhaust manifold and the 180kph limiter removed, so I assume it’s running some kind of map. I’ve just been thrashing it at the track non-stop—mostly Fuji Speedway now, since I need something with higher speed after all that autobahn time. The wheels on the R34 always pissed me off—too big, and it was a nightmare getting tires to fit properly under the arches. So I threw in the towel and bought something that fits better. Looks way cleaner too (at least to me)—less hotboy, less attention-seeking. Still an R34, though. Now for future plans. There are a few things still outstanding with the car. First up, the rear subframe needs an overhaul—that’s priority one. Next, I need to figure out an engine rebuild plan. No timeline yet, but I want to keep it economical—not cutting corners, just not throwing tens of thousands at a mechanic I can barely communicate with. And finally, paint. Plus a bit of tidying up here and there.  
    • Nope, needed to clearance under the bar a little with a heat gun, a 1/2" extension as the "clearancer", and big hammer, I was aware of this from the onset, they fit a 2.0 with this intake no problems, but, the 2.5 is around 15mm taller than a 2.0, so "clearancing" was required  It "just" touched when test fitting, now, I have about 10mm of clearance  You cannot see where it was done, and so far, there's no contact when giving it the beans Happy days
    • It's been a while since I've updated this thread. The last year (and some) has been very hectic. In the second-half of 2024 I took the R34 on a trip through Germany, Italy, France and Switzerland - it was f*cking great. I got a little annoyed with the attention the car was getting around Europe and really didn't drive it that much. I could barely work on the car since I was living in an inner-city apartment (with underground parking). During the trip, the car lost power steering in France - split hose - and I ended up driving around 4,000kms with no power steering.  There were a few Nurburgring trips here and there, but in total the R34 amassed just shy of 7,000kms on European roads. Long story short, I broke up with the reason I was transferred to Europe for and requested to be moved back to Japan. The E90, loved it. It was a sunk cost of around EUR 10,000 and I sold it to a friend for EUR 1,500 just to get rid of it quickly. Trust me, moving countries f*cking sucks and I could not be bothered to be as methodical as I was the first time around.
    • I assume clearances were all a-okay?
×
×
  • Create New...