Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 237
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry Sydneykid for the late reply, as you asked i have been gathering infomation to back up my claim. From what i understand you work for a race car team, use motec in your race cars and are very knowlagable in you area. I am prepared for your critcism and happy to reply, as you keep the thread positive. unlike like the other dicks here.

The wolf is a better computer because

1. Price, compared to the motec of simliair features the motec would cost over $7000

2. Idle speed control

3. it is a true plug and play

4. from exprience the fuel delivery

5. does not need CDI modules to run the coils properly.

6. the wolf has 2048map points, motec 1048

-----------

RNS11Z, i do have cams in the head, 256 in 264 ex, i will confirm mph on wednesday.

-----------

TIMMMAYYY, (acutual Pimp) give me a break you ****ing retard, i will answer your questions when you are polite enough to answer mine.

----------

ronin6 your opinion is well founded, the wolf has very basic data logging, an apsolute must for racing.

----------

rev210 :D

----------

raist60, smoke the coils, i will keep reading, ???????? no idea im not running at over 90% duty cycle.

----------

dnb i would love to , my car is open for inspection, changing injectors not easy, lots to remove.

---------

IMACUL8, i will talk it up, do you have a motec?, if so talk it up. clown

---------

INASNT yes im a wolf salesman, lol. did that take you long to think up.

---------

R32-GTS :D

--------

INASNT another quality installment, do you think before or after you dribble.

--------

BU5TER calling my self not the best drag racer would be to oposite of arrogant.?

--------

RB20LagWagon cry cry cry, yet again.

--------

my car is for real, sydneykid hope this is enough.

tristan

And what do we all expect to happen when he does, he's never been to the drags before ... hell it took me 6 months to get times that were 1/2 respectable out of a 400+hp car, it is not easy at all in a RWD how about we pressure him less and let him enjoy his car and after a few months of racing we have a look at his mph and judge it then :D

I for one don't want to see a nice skyline end up in the wall

there has been way to much pressure placed on tristan

none of this is his fault

his car makes that power full stop. it hasnt done a time full stop. he wont drive it to a time full stop. those are facts, **** the excuses and the arguing, what happens happens.

its a shame tristan is being used as a pawn by others to create arguments or to show off about how good their products are.

Good luck racing it, mate. Post your progress. I will suggest that the mph will be a better indicator of the cars' hp and potential ET's for the first while until you get a handle on the beast.

Adrian

A close friend of mine is one of the directors(owner) of AEM (advanced engine management) the manufacturer of WOLF ecu's.....I will have to commend him on his work next time i see him :)

Maybe he can hook magic1 up with a part time job :)

Magic good luck at the strip, what tyres and suspension setup will you be running?

raist60, smoke the coils, i will keep reading, ???????? no idea im not running at over 90% duty cycle.

Now I definitely think you aint running 370cc injectors dude. Wow! Less than 90% duty cycle on a 370cc injector (which makes 333cc best case) with 300+ rwkws.

CAWWWW!!!!

Ok so i got bored enough to actually do the maths and this is what i got...

Inj CC/Min Inj lb/hour Hp/Inj BHP

370 35.23809524 70.47619048 422.8571429

550 52.38095238 104.7619048 628.5714286

I got the formulas from http://www.rceng.com/technical.htm

Im no mathemagician just wanna show you what the maths says.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...