Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What areas of the intake and exhaust ports benefit most from porting and polishing on a RB25DET head?.

I've done plenty of Chev na heads before but i've been told that turbo heads need work done in different areas.

The head will need to flow over 600hp so even a minor port will make a difference. :spcartman

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55949-diy-portingpolishing/
Share on other sites

you wont make huge gains from porting on modern cylinder heads, but tidying up the short side radius and blending the seat to port transitions will help low to mid lift flow, on the exhaust the flow likes to go high so around the valve guides and the long side needs attention, also a nice radius on the short side is always good without opening the port cross sectional area to much, velocity is extremely important. Back cutting valves helps as well.

I had my RB25 head ported polished. Most of the work was done on the exhaust side however the usual was done on the inlet with the addition of deshrouding the inlet valves to help that forced air enter just that little quicker during low lift.

The exhaust was polished up to chrome and the inlet was roughened up to aid in low-mid rpm fuel atomisation.

im currently in the build of my Rb25/26 and we ported my head at home. Mainly concerntrating on the factory casting dags on the inside of both intake and exhaust ports. Also on exhaust side of head there is a lump in exhaust port, i was told to grind that smooth also and thats what i did, i have a feeling that it was there to speed up flow of exhaust gas into turbocharger to help initial spooling but this fela builds some tough imports like a 523hp rb25 r33 and more so i figured what he told me was alrite to do.

A lot of people do remove this lump in the exhaust BUT it does serve a purpose for a street engine.

For all out race I was told to remove it but for street it does help the exhaust gas velocity. It should still be smoothed out and made in to a smooth lump instead of the factory hard edge.

Mine was left in place but reduced quite a bit.

Its really the same as 'Should I polish the inlet or roughen it up'.

great thread here!i am about to port my head so this is great.

the exhaust side seems to me to need the most attention as it is very small.

has anyone ground the area between the 2 ports to make a sharp edge rather than the rounded edge it has?

i was also going to make my exhaust ports finish in a round rather than oval because im running a tubular manifold

If anyone wants a head to practice on i have a rb25 head that has no valve gear and has gone alittle soft.

Offers? :D

Oh and i got my head done a while ago. a small port/polish, valve seats, seals etc its just sitting around in plastic wrap waiting for the bottom end. I cant wait to see how it goes.

great thread here!i am about to port my head so this is great.

the exhaust side seems to me to need the most attention as it is very small.

has anyone ground the area between the 2 ports to make a sharp edge rather than the rounded edge it has?

i was also going to make my exhaust ports finish in a round rather than oval because im running a tubular manifold

knife edging the divider can actually increase turbulance, look at the edge of aircraft wings they are not sharpe, port matching is not nessasary as long as the port is smaller than the exhaust primary, infact the lip left acts as a dam to reversion gases.

Alf,

I normally use carbide burs for shaping and stock removal, you're probably safer using a double cut bur as theyre not as agressive. Next I use commercially available porting rolls to remove the die grinder bur marks. Once you get close to the shape you need I'd use 60 grit emery on a stick in the die grinder, turn the speed down a fair bit and it will leave a beautiful finish. You can also use flapper wheels in the bigger parts of the port. I normally remove the guides before I start to give access to the entire port then fit new guides once the porting is done and its time to cut the seats. Dont just cut the guides off flush with the port, theyre pretty short to start with and you need them to keep the valve positioned properly on the seat.

Ive found that a 4 angle inlet seat and a slight 30deg back cut on the inlet valve along with a radiused exhaust seat (it does have a 45deg part for the valve to seal on) and no back cut on the exhaust valve work really well and with a basic port job will pick up around 20CFM flow@28" of water.

2 things though, first, be very careful around the short turn radius, you need it to remain a radius and blend smoothly from the valve seat into the port. Second, don't make the port too big by hogging it out, theres no need and you will lose air velocity.

Thanks guys, some really helpful replies there.

What is best to use to do the porting with? and what is best to polish with?

I'm not quite sure with an alloy head as it's softer than cast iron heads.

dnb, I can't work out how to upload photos or i could show you the profiles here, if you want, have a look at:

http://www.proengines.com.au/images/radius.gif

and

http://www.proengines.com.au/images/4angle.gif

The profile of the cutter is what is cut on the valve seat. These aren't the exact profiles I use but are pretty close. The valve seats on the 45deg section.

Sweetr33, I can tell you in a few weeks, I haven't been game to take the entire lump out on a customers head as I'd hate to have to call them and tell them I had hit the water jacket porting their head or lost flow and needed to weld it back in there.

I'm starting on a head for my own engine, it'll be a RB30/RB26 head and I have the head here ready to start when I get a chance. I'll take the hump out a bit at a time and see what it does on the flowbench. I think it will work better as the exhaust port only flows around 73-75% of the inlet with the hump there and it would be nice for power to get it up around the 78-82% mark. I'll also be trying some bigger valves so I'll let you know.

Good stuff Proengines. :(

I noticed via your website you deshroud the inlet/exhaust valves.

Interesting. I was told by a few places not to worry about it.

I had my inlet valves deshrouded, exhausts were not.

You do some nice head work.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...