Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Chucked my R33 on the Dyno tonight for the first time since i got it. On low boost (0.5 bar) it made a 256rwhp :P. Then after trying to find out how the hell the Blitz EBC worked we managed to get it to do a run on 1.4 bar and and it made 320rwhp at the rev limiter!! This was due to how we had set up the boost controller, so its not really at the cars max power. We were short on time and never ended up fiddling further after this run and left it as is for now :D. I'm real chuffed anyway and i just had to tell the world :rofl:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/56314-dynoed-my-car-4-the-first-time/
Share on other sites

yeah its got a fair few things done. Its a hks GT2835R turbo with the 0.64 exhaust housing, greddy plenum are the main things things, plus the usual stuff like after market ecu and intercooler. I'll scan the graph tomorrow at work and post it up.

I saw 1.4 bar and thought arhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....

No mention of aftermarket turbo at that stage....

Plus he said going from .5bar (which is pretty much standard) i thought poor little thing...

Good work tho... Nice boost controllers... Ive gone from apexi avc-r to BLITZ SBC-i-D III

hey i was wondering...would you need a special manifolds for the HKS 2835R ? coz i was thinking of getting one for my r33 GTST but unsure if they would fit bolt on.

my hks 2835 uses a 0.71 exhaust housing but is a t25 flange

Will bolt on if its T3 flange

the dump pipe is a totally different flange. I just started pulling it apart so i'm not sure what time it does at the drags and probably won't get to find out for a while.

my hks 2835 uses a 0.71 exhaust housing but is a t25 flange

there's about 10 different version of this turbo. Mine is the GT2535R Pro version. Has internal gate, 0.7 comp cover, and 0.68 xhuast housing with a T3 flange. Its on the HKS website -> My Turbo I have the HKS exhaust manifold so i'm not sure if it would bolt onto the standard manifold or not.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...