Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

first read this.

Power ban for P-platers

By SIMON BENSON State Political Reporter

December 14, 2004

SOME P-plate drivers will be told what cars they can and can't drive - and be barred from high-powered vehicles - as the first stage of the State Government's solution to the youth carnage on NSW roads.

Those that have also had prior accidents or incurred demerit points and are deemed a risk will also be limited to how many passengers they can carry at certain times of the day.

These are the measures that The Daily Telegraph understands the NSW Roads Minister Carl Scully is finalising as a national P-plate forum prepares to meet tomorrow and are the preferred measures from 11 options already considered by the State Government.

Meanwhile, the Federal Government intends to trial an aggressive driver training program as part of its response to the young driver crisis.

The NSW Government's scheme -- which will ban P-platers from certain cars -- will tackle issues such as exemptions and what to do about high-powered cars already owned by young drivers.

The two new measures of power limits and passenger restrictions on drivers who have come to the attention of authorities, already raised as options to deal with rising youth carnage on the roads, have received support from P-plate forums and motoring groups over the past two weeks.

The Saving Lives on Our Roads Forum in Canberra tomorrow is at the instigation of Mr Scully and Federal Transport Minister John Anderson.

And since Mr Scully released the P-plate discussion paper late last month, more than 1000 submissions had been received.

Mr Scully yesterday would not confirm the development in his plan to cut the youth road toll but did say he had now ruled out curfews as an option.

"We have received more than 1000 submissions on the Young Driver discussion paper," he said. "I'm still considering the range of responses received on the 11 options to determine which, if any, could be announced before the end of the year.

"I will not introduce measures that do not have broad community support, that are impractical to administer and that are difficult to enforce.  

It is clear, however, from the initial responses that a curfew does not enjoy any significant level of community support and I will not be proceeding with it."

While the overall road toll in NSW is 18 lower than for the same time last year, young P-plate drivers are over-represented as a driving group and the number of deaths and injuries are rising.

Since August, a spate of deaths and a campaign by The Daily Telegraph has prompted Mr Scully to act swiftly to try and arrest the toll.

Last month he said he was sympathetic to restricting young drivers from having access to high-powered cars.

The other options which have been canvassed and could still be incorporated into a longer-term plan include:

* TOUGHER driving tests and longer learner and provisional licences

* DOUBLING the mandatory period of supervised driving for learner drivers from 50 hours to 100 hours;

* DOUBLING the minimum time spent on L-plates to 12 months, and increasing the provisional licence age to 18;

* IMPROVING the driving ability road test (from Ls to Ps) with more emphasis placed on hazard perception and safe driving practices; and

* MODIFING the demerit point system for provisional drivers.

Drivers under 26 make up just 15 per cent of licensed drivers, but are involved in 36 per cent of the fatal accidents.

On average, a P-plate driver dies in NSW every six days, while another 17 are involved in crashes each day.  

I am really sick of this diickhead, now many of you , like me aren't P-platers anymore, so such restrictions won't really affect us.

So then, why am I so pissed off? I'll tell you why, because these restrictions will now pathe the way for power restrictions on all cars, it'll be the 70's supercar scare all over again.

Honestly, how long do you think it is going to take before these car hateing pinko's start thinking, why do we need such powerful cars when the speed limit is only 110km/h, and then call for a power cap to be put on all cars?

It's time for all car enthusiasts to stand up and say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!

It's time to let Carl Scully and his cronees no that this legislation is going to cost him and his party votes.

I would urge every enthusiast on here to write to Mr Scully's office directly on the following address;

Carl Scully, NSW minister for roads (NSW Labour party)

[email protected]

Write to him and let him know he has just lost your vote, and not just your vote, let him know you will encourage as many people as you can not to vote for him (and the NSW labour party).

LET HIM KNOW THAT HIS BLATA0NT CONTEMPT FOR MOTORING ENTHUSIASTS AND MOTORISTS IN GENERAL WILL COST THE NSW LABOUR PARTY THE NEXT NSW STATE ELECTION!!!

:):P;):rofl::rofl:

I think endorsing driver training is a very, very smart move.

There's also other steps they should take to save lives on the roads; but I don't go into it as its a little controversial for some.

Having been involved in both a bad accient(i was not the driver) and having lost someone I know in a fatal car accident within the last 6 months, I too most definately feel action needs to be taken, however they're seeking solutions in the wrong places (except driver training which is most certainly an excellent suggestion)

I wouldn't take too much notice of this article... The Daily Telegraph has been spinning shit about this topic since it all began... Wait and see what the actual decision is before jumping to conclusion.

And if you want to hate anybody, hate the stupid ****s at the Daily Telegraph for all there P-plate bashing over the last month or so. They are the ones forcing the government to take such drastic measures.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Young-...2787085744.html

read this thread, its new from smh which is more neutral then DT......

Here are the more important quotes:

" Mr Scully said whatever restrictions were put in place there had to be exemptions for cases where a 17- or 18-year-old had already purchased a high-powered vehicle."

and also:

"You always have to have hardship provisions," Mr Scully said. "Government can't come along and basically cause financial ruin for a 17- or 18-year-old who lawfully purchased a vehicle ... You've also got to make provision if the only family car is a high-powered car."

I hope that this will mean i dont have to sell my line....coz that is really screwd...

There ARE power restrictions in Victoria.

125 kW per tonne (stock)

3.5 litres per tonne (stock)

Theoretically you can't drive an R33 GTS-T on your P plates. People still do, but they get big fines if they get caught.

You can apply for an exemption for special purposes. My mate worked at Porsche and needed to drive high powered cars for his job, and another mate who was a tradie pulled a trailer all day and therefore needed a V8.

In my opinion (more than 10 years on the road) I think it's a good idea to restrict young drivers to lower powered cars for a period of time.

Just imagine if your son or daughter (or Mum, Dad, brother, sister, girlfriend) was killed by a P-Plater driving a high powered car the day he got his licence.

Some people are going to say "Any car can kill anyone" and that's true. But when was the last time you saw a 75kW VW Golf drifting through a corner and wrapping itself around a poll because and INEXPERIENCED driver was being a fu(kwit behind the wheel.

I don't give a rats arse what anybody says about their own driving skill, and how many track days they've done and how many defensive drivers days and whatever that they have participated in, your need experience ON THE ROADS. This if where accidents happen and people get killed.

Being on a race track is all about going in the same direction as the rest of the people one the road, and you are all going down the same driving line, and on the same section of road over and over again. I'm not bagging and track drivers, but that's a fact. It's a lot safer on a track to do anything than on the road.

In Victoria, you can get your L-plates at 16, but cannot drive unsupervised until your get your P-Plates at 18.

Your Ps then last till you are 21.

I see no problem with the Victorian laws.

BASS OUT

I reckon they should put a power ban on p platers. Bikes have had it for ages, (and it proved worthwhile) y shouldnt cars?

I think there should be a way to allow people to still get the cars however. Like maybe if you are a member of a club (ie. u r responsible...doing your fun stuff of the street). Maybe they allow you to have performance cars once you complete some type of special test (ideally a driving school)

I think power restriction is a good thing - As long as there is a way that responsible people can still have them. Simple...prove yourself as responsible and have them, dont be responsible and don't.

Just my $0.02

I'm sorry 78vbsle but I don't disagree with all the points or options being put forward so your pro-enthusiast, anti-Scully campaign wont get any of my support. Please don't assume that your message is echoed by everyone here simply because we're motoring enthusiasts.

Adrian

I agree with Bass Junky. Vic laws have been quite effective ever since the P place power to weight restrictions came in.

at the same token a R32 GTS-T is legal to drive on your P's in Victoria - food for thought

I'm well past the p-plate age.. but I think its all a little misguided what they are trying to do. There have been, and will always be deaths on our roads. Making life difficult for a large number of people is not the way to do it.

I agree on some of the ideas in some ways, but you have to give people the freedom to make their own decisions in life. If people make silly decisions and destroy their lives or others, then so be it. That's been humanity for thousands of years.

Just red a report that summarised 50 cases throughout the world on driver education for novice drivers basically in 99% of the cases they didn’t do anything for the young driver road toll

Basically novice drivers even with training take too many risks and will continue to kill themselves

Training just improves their skills, which leads them to take even greater risks due to overconfidence

Will be interesting to see the results of the trial because if it works it will be the first successful one

I still consider that I was a damn sight more sensible than most people I knew at 18, but I'm glad I didn't have the 33 back then. I just didn't have the maturity or experience to safely drive it, or the cash to keep it in a safe condition. I had a VC Commodore with a mild 202 and 5 speed, which I enjoyed heaps, in which I learned plenty, and which I strongly believe prepared me for the step up to the Skyline. Driving a slower car for a while not only let me experiment with the car at lower speeds (~145 on the main straight at QR vs a lot more in the line), it also gave me time to learn roadcraft, which is something that a lot of people seem to forget. You can have raced gokarts since before you were conceived, you can have been a passenger on every road in the country, but nothing except experiencing it for yourself can teach you roadcraft. And while you might argue that your car goes, stops and corners better than a a sales rep's VX, forget your ego for a moment and remember that the best modification you can make to your car sits in the driver's seat.

All that said, I don't disagree with limiting power/weight on drivers fresh off their L's, but I do agree that the focus being solely on P-platers is unfair... and no, I'm not a P-plater, I've been on my opens for close on 5 years. Last time I looked, elderly drivers were also over-represented in crash statistics, but I don't see a huge push to get them off the roads. Why? A few reasons IMHO:

1. Much of the voting public can see themselves in the shoes of elderly drivers in the forseeable future. None have to worry about being 17 or 18 again, so they don't give two shits what happens to that end of the spectrum.

2. The pollies themselves would be fast approaching the age that compulsory retesting or whatever would come into effect, so they don't want to implement something that they themselves don't want to do.

3. The media and pollies haven't been bashing elderly drivers, so there's currently no public uproar on elderly drivers causing mayhem on our roads.

4. The general public seems to regard antisocial behaviour as far more of a problem than the issues caused by elderly drivers. Elderly drivers are often pitied, young drivers are hated. Look at stories on an old person who is massively disadvantaged by an uncaring govt who revoked their license - they suffer a loss of independence, their self-confidence is shot, and frail old Dot can't get to Bingo any more; yet the fact that Dot can't see more than 12 inches from her face and drives at 20km/h isn't mentioned. When a young person's license is taken away for doing 3km/h over the limit in a car with an aftermarket exhaust and FMIC, old people don't give a stuff, and ACA and TT show yet another 'hoon' story.

Elderly drivers often think that driving for the past 190 years (without reassessment or, in many cases, even a first assessment) makes them a better driver, and are oblivious to anything they do wrong, like weaving all over the road, changing lanes without looking/indicating, or doing 50 in a 110 zone (yes, that means you Mr Caravan-behind-a-Landcruiser man out near Roma!). Hmm, underskilled and overconfident... doesn't that argument sound familiar!!

In Qld (dunno about other states) there is no longer a need to do an eye test when renewing your license. It's OK if you can't see past the steering wheel, as long as you don't speed or have a pod filter. What does that tell you about the priorities of Queensland Transport?

I hate it when the Govt brings in a whole stack of things at the same time. They usually do it when there is opposition against one or more of the steps, because that way, if/when it works (as there are sometimes one or two good suggestions) they spread credit across ALL of their options. See, confiscation laws DID SAVE LIVES, it wasn't one of the other, far more sensible options... :)

from fatz

Basically novice drivers even with training take too many risks and will continue to kill themselves

I believe this is the one reason why p-platers always seem to feature so heavily when it comes to road carnage and fatal crashes - when you've never had the freedom and power a car provides before, when your mates (who either have their p's too or are getting them soon) are in the back seat cheering you on, when your dying to see what 150kmh feels like your bound to be doing irresponsible and unsafe things on the road. God knows I did it, throwing the old camira around like a toy... but after a year or two of driving, the novelty kind of wore off, and now i'd much rather maintain the car and just have it working well rather than racing it at every opportuniy.

not in all cases, but in alot its a novelty thing : get first car=be stupid until the novelty wears off.

Oh, and I've got to say power restrictions don't seem to be that well thought out - a 93 Holden Barina can go 150kmh and slam into a pole, just like a 300kw R33 can....and theres a pretty big power difference there. Just look at 250cc bike riders - the size/power restriciton there doesnt stop them having accidents. (although to be fair, they would probably be more likely to have one if they were on a bigger bike)

Blacky

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
×
×
  • Create New...