Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hiya all,

I have a R33 series1 GTS25 sedan which I have been slowly been working on over the last couple of years.

so far things that have been done,

K & N panel air filter

extractors

2 1/2" exhaust

manual conversion

nasty heavy duty clutch plate (you can't slip this one)

Installed a LSD

Front strut brace

king springs

bilstein shocks

white line rear sway bar

nolathane sway bar bushes

ROH adrenalin alloys (shadow chrome)

Mintex road/race brake pads

GTR rear spoiler, side skirts and end caps

I have a 400R front spoiler too, which I haven't had painted yet.

So the time has come and I have the erge to spend some more money on my baby. I have looked into many different options to try and and gain a few extra kw. I thought after market cams, a fuel pressure regulator and a safc would be the way to go, but found that the standard ecu would be the limiting factor in trying to get any decent sort of gains from the cams, and giving my stock cams a mild regrind wouldn't really yeild any noticable power gains.

So this got me thinking what if I spent my money on a new after market ecu, and use it as a base to work on in the future. After much thought this is the way I have decided to go, so I have ordered a new ecu (R33 GTS Link) which I should arrive in mid January, and hopefully will go into the car in late febuary.

So have any of you guys/gals replaced the ECU in your N/A skyline?

If you have, did it make much difference?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/59712-after-market-ecu-on-a-gts25/
Share on other sites

Not to sure how rich the mixtures are on the NA RB25's.

If they are quite rich like most Nissans chances are you should be able to lean them out a bit and pick up some good mid to top end power.

I would imagine the factory timing would already be quite agressive if they were mapped to Jap spec fuel, so probally won't be able to add much more in that area than the factory ecu already has.

You should be able to pick up a little bit here and there though...

Wolf and powerFC plugins work well on n/a cars and with exhaust and pod see around 165rwhp with all standard n/a mods helping this further.

Just with a after market ECU and exhaust/ pod!!?? How much for one of these ecu's and how much to tune steve??

Cheers

Do they require tunes and stuff done to them?? is there anyway i can buy one off someone thats just plug in and go?? how much of a gain can i see??

As far as I know they need to be tuned for the individual car, to get the best out of them. The ECU I'm getting is a plug in sort and will be set up first using a laptop and then fine tuned on the dyno. The guys selling the ECU to me, said that I should gain around 6-10kw with the addition of a tuned ECU on the dyno.

The ECU I'm buying gives me the option of removing the AFM, do you think this would be a good idea? Any one had any experince with a car with the AFM removed?

Yeah I think RB30-power is right in saying the A/F mixtures are rich, I have a A/F ratio gauge installed and it's always reads towards the richer end of the scale.

I've seen good results from ECU's on the RX8's from leaning fuel and advancing timing, this was in the US on some low-octane fuel too.

I can't see why an improvement couldn't be had on the RB25DE as well.

hey guys just some feedback and notes that ive read on the forced induction area

skylines are best suited for closed loop operation and using an air flow meter

theres jack all restriction from the air flow meter and removing it will give you nothing

you can inherit some bullshit problems and bad fuel economy from doing so (removing afm) as you usually use a map sensor instead im pretty sure.

also the cost to fit and tune an aftermarket ecu is a lot compared to gains achieved?

$1100 for power fc, $300 for tune and you get what 10kw extra?

most gtsts with power fc fitted and a shitty $100 bleed valve suck out an extra 30rwkw from ecu and tune much more resonable gains

have you guys considered turbo conversion instead of making the n/a faster

merli covered it once before and it does seem the most "cost effective" approach

just my 2 cents

you know the probably cheapest and best outcome

drive r33 gts25 n/a for 2-3 years or whatever once you are ready and have some cash

do an rb30 bottom end conversion and use a turbo manifold

cheap base car that hasn't been caned

rock solid rb30 bottom end

turbo head with new turbo, ecu, injectors etc

should be a real killer and make massive power

A bit of a gain can be made with the addition of an aftermarket computer with the added bonus of it running cleaner and more efficient. Keep in mind though a heavily modified N/A GTS will still struggle to keep up with even a lightly modified GTSt.

My advice, save the cash and do an RB25DET engine conversion. While more expensive in the short term, it will be far cheaper to extract more power out of it down the road. I did it on my R34 and have not looked back!!

My 2 cents.

Sounds like a plan, anyways, my skyline does me just fine as it is right now anyways... only my first car so i cant really complain... i dont wana have it for ages anyway, at the end of the day, i wana upgrade to an R34 either late 05 or early 06 when i have some driving under my belt, but even still... i want it to be a non turbo for the time being!

I'm fully aware that a lightly modded turbo will out perform a modded N/A. I'm lucky enough to own 2 skylines one a lightly modded turbo R32 GTS-T and the other is my R33 N/A, and yes in a straight line the GTS-T is quicker although at top end the GTS25 holds it's own and there's nothing in it and will slowly pull away from the R32. The truth of he matter is that I perfer the N/A over the turbo, and it's different, not many people choose to work a N/A, and I'm curious to see what sort of results I will be able to get, even though I know it's going to be expensive, and have relatively small gains for the amount of money spent.

As I said in one of my earlier posts I'm buying the ecu as a base to work on for future mods.

I have looked into doing a RB30 bottom end but have decided against it, and stay with the lighter RB25, and see what i can get out of it, One of my friends has put a RB30 bottom end into his car and last dyno he got 130rwkw and over 600Nm of tourque with extractors, pod filter, a 3" exhust system, and mine is currently at 112rwkw and 475Nm of torque.

Thanks for the advice on the AFM I have since done a search and found some info on the subject, and will most definitely keep the AFM.

When the Link ECU goes in I'll post up the results if people are interested.

thanks

Rach

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 2001 BE5D Subaru Legacy B4 RSK (3rd gen) EJ208 (pink injector) Twin Turbo 280PS 5-speed manual Full time 4WD "RSK" grade which means all of the above LQC option which means stock rear spoiler  I got it primarily to export to someone outside Japan who was interested. These BE5 Legacy B4 RSKs are going through a bit of a resurgence right know in Japan as they are one of the few cars from the "turbo, manual, RWD/4WD, 280hp gentleman's agreement era" cars that don't require stupid money to purchase. Which for some people might be a good opportunity to get as a base for restoration. If I can't find anyone to purchase it I will certainly be doing that myself over the long term. Why? Because it's properly fast in stock form, handles well enough for a GT sedan, there's still enough aftermarket and (if you can wait a while) genuine part support to make it a restoration candidate (<-- that will only get worse over time so it's a case of do it now or choose get a BL5 4th Gen). Mechanically it's fine, has only 89,200kms on the odometer. The problem with this car is that the body and exterior trims are weathered from at least the last 10 years being parked outdoors. I'm the 3rd owner, the first owner was the one that had it for 14 years and barely drove it, had a low-speed front impact (which didn't damage anything behind the radiator support) and got it fixed and sold it. The 2nd owner put most of the kms on it and parked it outside for the last 10 years, hence the door rubbers have seen better days but if you overlook those cosmetic details, it presents pretty nicely. There is some minor rust on the LH rear wheel arch which I'll have looked at too at some stage.  Also as you'd expect from a car this age, the clear top coat is gone, leaving a satin finish on the roof.  Mechanically it's fine (as you would expect from a car with less than 100K kms) but the steering does feel slightly vague around the centre position at higher speeds. So first on the list is to get the steering rack bushes looked at. There's also the Lock button on the remote which doesn't work, but the Open button does.... it means that the anti-theft system thinks it's always open? It seems like if you open the car and don't start the engine within 3 mins or so the anti-theft kicks in again without any beeps or signals. So if you got to start it after that, it won't. You have to push the open button again. That's how I understand it anyway. Just a small irritation but not a big problem to sort out. There's only one mod, the Wangan SPL muffler. Just a tad louder than stock. It's a really good mod for those who don't want to wake the neighbours but still want to hear a more prominent unequal length header EJ20 sound. Anyway I hope to get all those things done eventually, that is unless someone wanted to import it to their country from Japan (where I live). I'm open for negotiations as I really would like a Skyline... but this will definitely suffice in the meantime 🙂 *Disclaimer: This is how I picked it up from the dealer, minus the stuff on the back seat. I haven't cleaned the engine bay or done a thorough exterior clean, aside from spray painting the wipers. 
    • Wow, even with the Audi logo centre caps. I love OEM wheel mismatches. 
    • Welcome!  Can't go wrong with a Stag.
    • Looks good. Nice height.
    • Hey all, a little help from the Stagea hive mind plz.. I'm days away from buying either a 2002 Stagea 250tRS AR-X Four, premium leather, power seats and all the old switches etc that go with it, or a 2002 Stagea 250tRS VR-X Four AERO, pov pack, cloth seats etc, with coil overs, sports zorst, comes with original zorst and suspension and parts. (I think I've got the models right?) Both are VQ25DET, have 160000kms, both straight no rust both with $2000+ in recent servicing receipts, both ride on aftermarket 18" rims. The Aero has a replaced turbo as well. I like the cool factor of the Aero car but the AR-X has never been modified. Neither have been driven hardly at all in the last 5 years. Any thoughts on which one or does it come down to personal preference? davemoto 
×
×
  • Create New...