Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just plugged it in, pushed the kick panel back and drove it. No problems :-)

Most other PFC problems I have heard of are word of mouth (I know someone who tried it and ....) so I wonder if its just stories being told or if they did really try it.

Mine is in a series 1 R33, so it may be a model specific thing, I dont know for sure.

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

both have pro's n con's

i love my auto .... seems to hold boost a lot better than a manual .... the only time i wish i had a manual is when cornering.

i like to drag - so it suits those purposes perfectly.

The power your car makes is only limited by your budget and imagination ..... not whether its auto or manual.

Have you compared the shift quality to a non PowerFC auto 33 before you had the shift kit?

Shift quality didnt change when I put the PFC in the car.

Originally my shifts were good (tight) compared to other autos I had driven (Holden, Ford, Chrysler) but after the shift kit its VERY tight. (ie it will chirp tyres between gear changes, which it would only do previously when I had crap tyres on the car) :wassup:

OK cool but have you compared your car pre PowerFC to an auto 33 running the stock (auto) ECU...

I'm just thinking out loud here so don't take offence but perhaps your car originally had a manual ECU, hence the reason you didn't notice a change in shift quality...

Every single test I've done on auto 33's with a replacement ECU has resulted in a change in shift quality...

OK cool but have you compared your car pre PowerFC to an auto 33 running the stock (auto) ECU...

 

I'm just thinking out loud here so don't take offence but perhaps your car originally had a manual ECU, hence the reason you didn't notice a change in shift quality...

 

Every single test I've done on auto 33's with a replacement ECU has resulted in a change in shift quality...

Yeh same, its not just word of mouth, ive experienced it too. Wasnt TOO bad but it was enough.

why is yours different to everyone elses 4door?

the truth is all the gear logic and changing codes are gone, so something must have changed

what model of pfc have u got?

also did you take your car to MV with the pfc?

The PFC was in the car prior to going to MV automatics.

I have offered Sydney Kid a drive in my car next time he is in Adelaide (he didnt come to Mallalar last time) which may answer some of your questions and I believe others will value his comments and opinions.

Well firstly let me point out that i'm not taking sides here, i have owned both autos and manuals and both have their good points but i have to point out a lot of the complete crap that has been written here. It was mentioned briefly on the first page but wasn't brought up again.

I am assuming there are no engineers posting in this thread, because if there were they would tell you that some energy (and therefore power) is lost at EVERY linkage. Therefore seeing as the auto has more components and therefore more linkages it MUST make less power than a manual with similar mods.

There is no point arguing 'my auto skyline feels faster than my mates manual', you cannot argue with science. It has been proven over hundreds of years.

An auto skyline against a manual skyline with EXACTLY the same mods, the manual will win EVERY time, no arguments, assuming the manual driver can drive. Not wanting to open a can of worms, just pointing out some scientific facts. The reports i've seen estimate the drivetrain losses to be about 20-25% greater in an auto than a manual.

Cheers

:rofl:

at least this argument had facts to support it, thanks xxxx for providing a logical point of view. however in defence of auto's (remember I do drive a manual and i do think they are more fun) every person I know who races cars in drags (seriously) be it skylines or v8's or whatever uses an auto (mostly 2 speed powerglides for v8's) now all these people (plus all the ones I don't know, but see on tv) can't be wrong. now before someone jumps down my throat and says it is not the same as a normal stock auto, no maybe not but it is still an auto. the best way to determine this is do what i said before race an auto and manual. if slide is still in and has mods like mine or rwKW close to mine then I am happy to try it.

how long can a drag modified gearbox last in a daily driver? come on, surely its been tuned specifically for drag use only, with increased ability to handle short busts at high power.

as for the torque converter giving you more power... here's a few things to consider...

an official Nissan statement about the R34 says:

Nissan's new "E-flow Torque Converter" that increases power transmission efficiency to nearly the ultimate limit has also been adopted to reconcile smooth, pleasing power delivery with improved fuel economy for greater environmental friendliness.

Now from that I'd conclude that the torque converter delivers "power transmission efficiency to nearly the ultimate limit", which is that of a manual. I mean what else can you compare it to?

also... impeller, stator, and turbine in a torque converter all have energy loss, so even though the torque is being multiplied, what is being expended?

I'll try and grab the Brochures for the R33 manuals and autos and compare their power charts. Might give a better idea stock for stock.

i posted that b4 i broke my gb

runs like poo now

was hittin 187rwkw bfore and id say ive lost heaps of power

i were chirping 2nd sometimes 3rd most times but now doesnt at all

if you are going on the cruise on the 20th youll see it under good behavior

took it to an automatic fixer and he said i need an overhaul

like i said too much puttin in nuetral reving and dumping

if theres a track day coming up ill give you a drive if you want just dont crash it

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/torque-converter.htm

" In addition to the very important job of allowing your car come to a complete stop without stalling the engine, the torque converter actually gives your car more torque when you accelerate out of a stop. Modern torque converters can multiply the torque of the engine by two to three times. This effect only happens when the engine is turning much faster than the transmission. At higher speeds, the transmission catches up to the engine, eventually moving at almost the same speed. Ideally, though, the transmission would move at exactly the same speed as the engine, because this difference in speed wastes power. This is part of the reason why cars with automatic transmissions get worse gas mileage than cars with manual transmissions.

To counter this effect, some cars have a torque converter with a lockup clutch. When the two halves of the torque converter get up to speed, this clutch locks them together, eliminating the slippage and improving efficiency."

The PFC was in the car prior to going to MV automatics.  

I have offered Sydney Kid a drive in my car next time he is in Adelaide (he didnt come to Mallalar last time) which may answer some of your questions and I believe others will value his comments and opinions.

i dont know if i can wait that long, im almost at the point where i dont care anymore and will just get a pfc so i know everything will run properly :)

i hate dodgy shifts though, and its definately not good when u go to sell.

is there anyone else on sau near you that u can take for a drive to get a 2nd opinion? cos i dont understand how yours can be any different to all the other people who have tried it

i posted that b4 i broke my gb

runs like poo now

was hittin 187rwkw bfore and id say ive lost heaps of power

i were chirping 2nd sometimes 3rd most times but now doesnt at all

if you are going on the cruise on the 20th youll see it under good behavior

took it to an automatic fixer and he said i need an overhaul

like i said too much puttin in nuetral reving and dumping

if theres a track day coming up ill give you a drive if you want just dont crash it

Who did you speak to about getting work done?

Best places ive found so far is Mark asnea at morningside and Athena Automatics at wakerly

Im going to call up MV AUTO in nsw because they are experts on skyline autos, and see what he thinks is the best way to do it; Most probably get them to send me out their shift kit etc and get somewhere here to fit it

i dont know if i can wait that long, im almost at the point where i dont care anymore and will just get a pfc so i know everything will run properly  :D  

i hate dodgy shifts though, and its definately not good when u go to sell.  

is there anyone else on sau near you that u can take for a drive to get a 2nd opinion? cos i dont understand how yours can be any different to all the other people who have tried it

i dont understand either , im very confused .

:headspin:

is there anyone else on sau near you that u can take for a drive to get a 2nd opinion? cos i dont understand how yours can be any different to all the other people who have tried it

Yes there are others, but no one else on these forums has the sort of reputation that Sydney Kid has (other than myself :D )

Im going to call up MV AUTO in nsw because they are experts on skyline autos, and see what he thinks is the best way to do it; Most probably get them to send me out their shift kit etc and get somewhere here to fit it

The MV Automatics I went to is here in Adelaide.

1 Stirling Rd Blackwood 5051 (08) 8370 0430

Kirra automatics they are the ones to see around (more import knowledge in bris though)

im getting my uncle to do the conversion when ive got the cash and ive lined up a manual box privately

how long can a drag modified gearbox last in a daily driver? come on, surely its been tuned specifically for drag use only, with increased ability to handle short busts at high power.

Well my auto is about as worked as you can get. It is built to handle 800hp although i only have about half of that. It has a 4500 stall and is also daily driven. I have been driving it for two years now. The only thing that kills autos is heat. I find it easy to drive you just need to adjust your driving style, just like you would have to with a triple plate clutch. The only down side is that it uses more petrol than a manual.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...