Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just plugged it in, pushed the kick panel back and drove it. No problems :-)

Most other PFC problems I have heard of are word of mouth (I know someone who tried it and ....) so I wonder if its just stories being told or if they did really try it.

Mine is in a series 1 R33, so it may be a model specific thing, I dont know for sure.

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

both have pro's n con's

i love my auto .... seems to hold boost a lot better than a manual .... the only time i wish i had a manual is when cornering.

i like to drag - so it suits those purposes perfectly.

The power your car makes is only limited by your budget and imagination ..... not whether its auto or manual.

Have you compared the shift quality to a non PowerFC auto 33 before you had the shift kit?

Shift quality didnt change when I put the PFC in the car.

Originally my shifts were good (tight) compared to other autos I had driven (Holden, Ford, Chrysler) but after the shift kit its VERY tight. (ie it will chirp tyres between gear changes, which it would only do previously when I had crap tyres on the car) :wassup:

OK cool but have you compared your car pre PowerFC to an auto 33 running the stock (auto) ECU...

I'm just thinking out loud here so don't take offence but perhaps your car originally had a manual ECU, hence the reason you didn't notice a change in shift quality...

Every single test I've done on auto 33's with a replacement ECU has resulted in a change in shift quality...

OK cool but have you compared your car pre PowerFC to an auto 33 running the stock (auto) ECU...

 

I'm just thinking out loud here so don't take offence but perhaps your car originally had a manual ECU, hence the reason you didn't notice a change in shift quality...

 

Every single test I've done on auto 33's with a replacement ECU has resulted in a change in shift quality...

Yeh same, its not just word of mouth, ive experienced it too. Wasnt TOO bad but it was enough.

why is yours different to everyone elses 4door?

the truth is all the gear logic and changing codes are gone, so something must have changed

what model of pfc have u got?

also did you take your car to MV with the pfc?

The PFC was in the car prior to going to MV automatics.

I have offered Sydney Kid a drive in my car next time he is in Adelaide (he didnt come to Mallalar last time) which may answer some of your questions and I believe others will value his comments and opinions.

Well firstly let me point out that i'm not taking sides here, i have owned both autos and manuals and both have their good points but i have to point out a lot of the complete crap that has been written here. It was mentioned briefly on the first page but wasn't brought up again.

I am assuming there are no engineers posting in this thread, because if there were they would tell you that some energy (and therefore power) is lost at EVERY linkage. Therefore seeing as the auto has more components and therefore more linkages it MUST make less power than a manual with similar mods.

There is no point arguing 'my auto skyline feels faster than my mates manual', you cannot argue with science. It has been proven over hundreds of years.

An auto skyline against a manual skyline with EXACTLY the same mods, the manual will win EVERY time, no arguments, assuming the manual driver can drive. Not wanting to open a can of worms, just pointing out some scientific facts. The reports i've seen estimate the drivetrain losses to be about 20-25% greater in an auto than a manual.

Cheers

:rofl:

at least this argument had facts to support it, thanks xxxx for providing a logical point of view. however in defence of auto's (remember I do drive a manual and i do think they are more fun) every person I know who races cars in drags (seriously) be it skylines or v8's or whatever uses an auto (mostly 2 speed powerglides for v8's) now all these people (plus all the ones I don't know, but see on tv) can't be wrong. now before someone jumps down my throat and says it is not the same as a normal stock auto, no maybe not but it is still an auto. the best way to determine this is do what i said before race an auto and manual. if slide is still in and has mods like mine or rwKW close to mine then I am happy to try it.

how long can a drag modified gearbox last in a daily driver? come on, surely its been tuned specifically for drag use only, with increased ability to handle short busts at high power.

as for the torque converter giving you more power... here's a few things to consider...

an official Nissan statement about the R34 says:

Nissan's new "E-flow Torque Converter" that increases power transmission efficiency to nearly the ultimate limit has also been adopted to reconcile smooth, pleasing power delivery with improved fuel economy for greater environmental friendliness.

Now from that I'd conclude that the torque converter delivers "power transmission efficiency to nearly the ultimate limit", which is that of a manual. I mean what else can you compare it to?

also... impeller, stator, and turbine in a torque converter all have energy loss, so even though the torque is being multiplied, what is being expended?

I'll try and grab the Brochures for the R33 manuals and autos and compare their power charts. Might give a better idea stock for stock.

i posted that b4 i broke my gb

runs like poo now

was hittin 187rwkw bfore and id say ive lost heaps of power

i were chirping 2nd sometimes 3rd most times but now doesnt at all

if you are going on the cruise on the 20th youll see it under good behavior

took it to an automatic fixer and he said i need an overhaul

like i said too much puttin in nuetral reving and dumping

if theres a track day coming up ill give you a drive if you want just dont crash it

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/torque-converter.htm

" In addition to the very important job of allowing your car come to a complete stop without stalling the engine, the torque converter actually gives your car more torque when you accelerate out of a stop. Modern torque converters can multiply the torque of the engine by two to three times. This effect only happens when the engine is turning much faster than the transmission. At higher speeds, the transmission catches up to the engine, eventually moving at almost the same speed. Ideally, though, the transmission would move at exactly the same speed as the engine, because this difference in speed wastes power. This is part of the reason why cars with automatic transmissions get worse gas mileage than cars with manual transmissions.

To counter this effect, some cars have a torque converter with a lockup clutch. When the two halves of the torque converter get up to speed, this clutch locks them together, eliminating the slippage and improving efficiency."

The PFC was in the car prior to going to MV automatics.  

I have offered Sydney Kid a drive in my car next time he is in Adelaide (he didnt come to Mallalar last time) which may answer some of your questions and I believe others will value his comments and opinions.

i dont know if i can wait that long, im almost at the point where i dont care anymore and will just get a pfc so i know everything will run properly :)

i hate dodgy shifts though, and its definately not good when u go to sell.

is there anyone else on sau near you that u can take for a drive to get a 2nd opinion? cos i dont understand how yours can be any different to all the other people who have tried it

i posted that b4 i broke my gb

runs like poo now

was hittin 187rwkw bfore and id say ive lost heaps of power

i were chirping 2nd sometimes 3rd most times but now doesnt at all

if you are going on the cruise on the 20th youll see it under good behavior

took it to an automatic fixer and he said i need an overhaul

like i said too much puttin in nuetral reving and dumping

if theres a track day coming up ill give you a drive if you want just dont crash it

Who did you speak to about getting work done?

Best places ive found so far is Mark asnea at morningside and Athena Automatics at wakerly

Im going to call up MV AUTO in nsw because they are experts on skyline autos, and see what he thinks is the best way to do it; Most probably get them to send me out their shift kit etc and get somewhere here to fit it

i dont know if i can wait that long, im almost at the point where i dont care anymore and will just get a pfc so i know everything will run properly  :D  

i hate dodgy shifts though, and its definately not good when u go to sell.  

is there anyone else on sau near you that u can take for a drive to get a 2nd opinion? cos i dont understand how yours can be any different to all the other people who have tried it

i dont understand either , im very confused .

:headspin:

is there anyone else on sau near you that u can take for a drive to get a 2nd opinion? cos i dont understand how yours can be any different to all the other people who have tried it

Yes there are others, but no one else on these forums has the sort of reputation that Sydney Kid has (other than myself :D )

Im going to call up MV AUTO in nsw because they are experts on skyline autos, and see what he thinks is the best way to do it; Most probably get them to send me out their shift kit etc and get somewhere here to fit it

The MV Automatics I went to is here in Adelaide.

1 Stirling Rd Blackwood 5051 (08) 8370 0430

Kirra automatics they are the ones to see around (more import knowledge in bris though)

im getting my uncle to do the conversion when ive got the cash and ive lined up a manual box privately

how long can a drag modified gearbox last in a daily driver? come on, surely its been tuned specifically for drag use only, with increased ability to handle short busts at high power.

Well my auto is about as worked as you can get. It is built to handle 800hp although i only have about half of that. It has a 4500 stall and is also daily driven. I have been driving it for two years now. The only thing that kills autos is heat. I find it easy to drive you just need to adjust your driving style, just like you would have to with a triple plate clutch. The only down side is that it uses more petrol than a manual.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
×
×
  • Create New...