Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well it seems as if the response to your return, teejay, is all positive and it appears like the WA people can all get along again and play happy families.

If not, I think a WA MOD re-shuffle needs to occur as reading through all the deleted crap (and some of the stuff that isn't deleted) i can see people being more than a little biased as to the nature of the individuals concerned.

Happy to help guys :)

Adrian

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61368-mods-discussion/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hahahha I got nothing to be scare of...

and Why should we?

I think few others not only mods but members in WA should think before What they say in the forum.

I have observed some behaviour among the mods as well as the member, not behaving as they should have...

You guys really think MOD's job is easy, I tell you it Isn't easy job... if I see anyone up to challenge, go ahead nominate yourself and members will decide in the GM or annual meeting.

The problem is people dont think before they express their opinions and the consequences of their thoughtless out burst and wrongful statements...

but still people are entitled to express their opinion but if that causes (someone else expense) some one loosing their future business... I dotn think its right way to go about it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61368-mods-discussion/#findComment-1157787
Share on other sites

Yes I was only expressing my opinion but lets see what comes of it.

I have the power but lack the authority or inclination to assign new mods for WA. I think it's something that you can sort out for yourself.

It really does seem like you're all getting along and that N I B and teejay's issues are all dead and buried. Understand guys'n'gals that I don't have a side in that argument. I don't know either of the parties involved and that makes me more impartial than the 'would-be-heroes' that tell people to "butt out".

Why can't we all just get along?

Adrian

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61368-mods-discussion/#findComment-1157806
Share on other sites

Hey i didnt relinquish anything, someone had it done for me. I merely suggested it and it happened without my knowledge. Last i recall dan and i were gonna be retaining the same status. I suspect there was something going on in my abscence. :Paranoid:

Im just having a discussion here Liz dont get all rilled up, its all ok, chilllllll, calm blue ocean.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61368-mods-discussion/#findComment-1157815
Share on other sites

hahahha I got nothing to be scare of...

and Why should we?

I think few others not only mods but members in WA should think before What they say in the forum.

I have observed some behaviour among the mods as well as the members, not behaving as they should...

The problem is people dont think before they express their opinions and the consequences of their thoughtless out burst and wrongful statements...

but still people are entitle to express their opinion but if that causes (someone else expense) some one loosing their future business... I dotn think its right way to go about it.

and come on people have some respect to people who trying to do our job.

at the end of the day we are here because YOU ARE HERE, we are here to help you.

SO HELP US TO HELP YOU!

cheers

Joe

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61368-mods-discussion/#findComment-1157814
Share on other sites

there are not supposed to be though.

For example if a company lets call BBD tuning puts money and dicounts and stuff toward members of SAUWA, it still has no reason to get preferential treatment over any other member. Sure there is always the slagging of companys rule which is steadfast but they dont deserve any special treatment over any1 else because they are a business.

I think this is where the "if u cant say soemthing nice dont say nothing at all" rule goes to hell. there have been many cases with ppl suggesting companies for ppls problems etc etc but whenever there is negative feedback it gets shut down. Kinda doesnt really work in that respect. U know unbiased info and all. Still what can we do, those are teh rules. Unless there is no mention of any businesses whatsoever, which would not really work.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61368-mods-discussion/#findComment-1157874
Share on other sites




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...